0800 019 7073 - Direct Access Barristers, Public Access Barristers, Employment Barristers Chambers - Employment Law Barristers Directory

Instruct A Public Access Barrister directly

January 8, 2012
Comments Off on Instruct A Public Access Barrister directly


Sex Discrimination Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Employment Rights Act 1996
Equal Pay Act 1970
Recast Equal Opportunities and Equal Treatment Directive 2006/54/EC (consolidates the Equal Pay Directive (75/117/EEC), the Equal Treatment Directive (76/207/EEC) and the Burden of Proof Directive (97/80/EC), which were repealed by the recast Directive with effect from 15 August 2009) 
Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3312)
Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Sex Discrimination (Gender Reassignment) Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/1102)
Sex Discrimination (Indirect Discrimination and Burden of Proof) Regulations 2001 (SI 2001/2660)
Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1657)
Employment Equality (Sex Discrimination) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/2467)
Gender Recognition Act 2004
Civil Partnership Act 2004
Equality Act 2006
Protection from Harassment Act 1997
Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/656)
Maternity and Parental Leave etc and the Paternity and Adoption Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2008 SI 2008/1966

Sex Discrimination Caselaw

A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and another [2004] IRLR 573 HL
Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Abbey National plc v Formoso [1999] IRLR 222 EAT
Ahsan v Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of other members of the Labour Party) [2008] IRLR 243 HL 
Alabaster v Barclays Bank plc and Secretary of State for Social Security (No.2) [2005] IRLR 576 CA
Allaway v Reilly and another [2007] IRLR 864 EAT
Allen and others v GMB [2008] IRLR 690 CA
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Ashton v Chief Constable of West Mercia Constabulary [2001] ICR 67 EAT
B v A [2007] IRLR 576 EAT
B and another v A [2010] IRLR 400 EAT
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz [1986] IRLR 317 ECJ
British Airways plc v Starmer [2005] IRLR 862 EAT
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Brown v Rentokil Ltd [1998] IRLR 445 ECJ
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAVTS) v Thibault [1998] IRLR 399 ECJ
Caledonia Bureau Investment & Property v Caffrey [1998] IRLR 110 EAT
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Chessington World of Adventures Ltd v Reed ex parte News Group Newspapers Ltd [1998] IRLR 56 EAT
Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary v Chew EAT/503/00
Chief Constable of the Bedfordshire Constabulary v Graham [2002] IRLR 239 EAT
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v Vento [2001] IRLR 124 EAT
Coker and Osamor v Lord Chancellor and Lord Chancellor’s Department [2002] IRLR 80 CA
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Croft v Royal Mail Group plc [2003] IRLR 592 CA
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Dansie v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis EAT/0234/09
Day v T Pickles Farms Ltd [1999] IRLR 217 EAT
de Belin v Eversheds Legal Services Ltd ET/1804069/09
Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum Voor Jonge Volwassen (VJV-Centrum) Plus [1991] IRLR 27 ECJ
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
Elliott v Somerset County Council [2002] ET/1400922/02
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hacking & Paterson and another v Wilson EAT/0054/09
Haines Lee v Relate Berkshire EAT/1458/01
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
Hampson v Department of Education and Science [1989] IRLR 69 CA
Hardman v Mallon t/a Orchard Lodge Nursing Home [2002] IRLR 516 EAT
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Honda Motor Europe v McMillan EAT/0471/06
Igen Ltd (formerly Leeds Careers Guidance) and others v Wong and other cases [2005] IRLR 258 CA
James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] IRLR 288 HL
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jiménez Melgar v Ayuntamiento de los Barrios [2001] IRLR 848 ECJ
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Jones v University of Manchester [1993] IRLR 218 CA
KB v National Health Service Pensions Agency and another [2004] IRLR 240 ECJ
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Kettle Produce Ltd v Ward EATS/0016/06
Kiiski v Tampereen kaupunki Case C-116/06 ECJ)
Kulikaoskas v Macduff Shellfish and another EATS/0062/09 & EATS/0063/09
LB Steel v (1) The Union of Post Office Workers and (2) The General Post Office [1977] IRLR 288 EAT
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
Lockwood v Crawley Warren Group Ltd EAT/1176/99
London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No.2) [1998] IRLR 364 CA
M Schmidt v Austicks Bookshops Ltd [1977] IRLR 360 EAT
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Madarassy v Nomura International plc [2007] IRLR 246 CA
Madden v Preferred Technical Group Cha Ltd and another [2005] IRLR 46 CA
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Marriott Motor Group and others v Cottington EAT/0319/08; EAT/0320/08
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
Mayr v Bäckerei Und Konditorei Gerhard Flöckner OHG [2008] IRLR 387 ECJ
McGuigan v TG Baynes & Sons EAT/1114/97
Ministry of Defence v DeBique [2010] IRLR 471 EAT
Moonsar v Fiveways Express Transport Ltd [2005] IRLR 9 EAT
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
O’Neill v Buckinghamshire County Council [2010] IRLR 384 EAT
Oyarce v Cheshire County Council [2008] IRLR 653 CA
North Western Health Board v McKenna [2005] IRLR 399 ECJ
P v S and Cornwall County Council [1996] IRLR 347 ECJ
Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield Secondary School [2001] IRLR 669 CA
Pell v Wagstaff and Wheatley Hotel [2000] ET/2801882/99
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
Pothecary Witham Weld and another v Bullimore and another and the Equality and Human Rights Commission [2010] IRLR 572 EAT
Queen Victoria Seaman’s Rest Ltd v Ward EAT/0465/08
Ramdoolar v Bycity Ltd EAT/0236/04
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
(1) Reed and (2) Bull Information Systems Ltd v Stedman [1999] IRLR 299 EAT
Sahota v The Home Office and Pipkin EAT/0342/09
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
Shaw v CCL Ltd [2008] IRLR 284 EAT
Smith v Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd t/a Reliance Monitoring Services [2002] ET/1400993/02
Smith v Safeway plc [1996] IRLR 456 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Stoke-on-Trent Community Transport v Cresswell EAT/359/93
Tele Danmark A/S v Handels- og Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund i Danmark (HK), acting on behalf of Brandt-Nielsen [2001] IRLR 853 ECJ
The Home Office v Holmes [1984] IRLR 299 EAT
Thomas and another v Robinson [2003] IRLR 7 EAT
Tradition Securities and Futures SA v X and another [2008] IRLR 934 EAT 
Visa International Service Association v Paul [2004] IRLR 42 EAT
Waters v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1997] IRLR 589 CA
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd [1994] IRLR 482 ECJ
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No.2) [1995] IRLR 645 HL
Whiffen v Milham Ford Girls’ School [2001] IRLR 468 CA
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA

Race Discrimination Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Employment Rights Act 1996
Race Relations Act 1976
Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Race Directive (2000/43/EC)
Treaty establishing the European Community
Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC)
Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1626)
Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/3008)
Codes of practice
Employment statutory code of practice
Home Office code of practice for employers on the avoidance of race discrimination in employment practice while seeking to prevent illegal working (on Border & Immigration Agency website)
Code of practice on racial equality in employment

Race Discrimination Caselaw

Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Abbey National plc and another v Chagger [2009] IRLR 86 EAT
Adekeye v The Post Office (No.2) [1997] IRLR 105 CA
Ahsan v Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of other members of the Labour Party) [2008] IRLR 243 HL
Amnesty International v Ahmed [2009] IRLR 884 EAT
Anya v University of Oxford and another [2001] IRLR 377 CA
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Aziz v Trinity Street Taxis Ltd and others [1988] IRLR 204 CA
Bahl v The Law Society and others [2004] IRLR 799 CA
Balamoody v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2002] IRLR 288 CA
Barclays Bank plc v Kapur and others (No.2) [1995] IRLR 87 CA
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
BBC Scotland v Souster [2001] IRLR 150 CS
Board of Governors of St Matthias Church of England School v Crizzle [1993] IRLR 472 EAT
Bossa v Nordstress Ltd and another [1998] IRLR 284 EAT
British Airways plc v Mak and others EAT/0055/09
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Burton and Rhule v De Vere Hotels [1996] IRLR 596 EAT 
Centrum voor Gelijkheid van Kansen en voor Racismebestrijding v Firma Feryn NV [2008] IRLR 732 ECJ
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v Vento [2001] IRLR 124 EAT
Coker and Osamor v Lord Chancellor and Lord Chancellor’s Department [2002] IRLR 80 CA 
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Derby Specialist Fabrication Ltd v Burton [2001] IRLR 69 EAT
Dhatt v McDonalds Hamburgers Ltd [1991] IRLR 130 CA
Din v Carrington Viyella Ltd (Jersey Kapwood Ltd) [1982] IRLR 281 EAT
Edozie v G4S Security Services (UK) Ltd and another EAT/0124/09
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Falkirk Council and others v Whyte and others [1997] IRLR 560 EAT
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Gravell v London Borough of Bexley EAT/0587/06
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
Hammonds LLP and others v Mwitta EAT/0026/10
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Ice Hockey Super League Ltd v Henry EAT/1167/99
ISS Mediclean Ltd v Elkiyari EAT/0205/10
JH Walker Ltd v Hussain and others [1996] IRLR 11 EAT
James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] IRLR 288 HL
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Jones v University of Manchester [1993] IRLR 218 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
King v The Great Britain-China Centre [1991] IRLR 513 CA
Kingston & Richmond Area Health Authority v Kaur [1981] IRLR 337 EAT
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
London Borough of Camden v Miah EAT/0031/08
London Borough of Lambeth v Commission for Racial Equality [1990] IRLR 231 CA
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Malik v British Home Stores [1980] ET/29014/79
Mandla and another v Lee and others [1983] IRLR 209 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
Mehmet t/a Rose Hotel Group v Aduma EAT/0573/06 & EAT/0574/06
Ministry of Defence v DeBique [2010] IRLR 471 EAT
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
Okonu v G4S Security Services (UK) Ltd EAT/0035/07
Osborne Clarke Services v Purohit [2009] IRLR 341 EAT
Owen & Briggs v James [1982] IRLR 502 CA
Oyarce v Cheshire County Council [2008] IRLR 653 CA
Queenscourt Ltd v Nyateka EAT/0182/06
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP v Popa EAT/0030/10
R v Commission for Racial Equality ex parte Westminster City Council [1985] IRLR 426 CA
R on the application of E v (1) The Governing Body of JFS (2) The Admissions Appeal Panel of JFS [2009] EWCA Civ 626 CA
R on the application of E v (1) The Governing Body of JFS (2) The Admissions Appeal Panel of JFS [2009] UKSC 15 SC
R (on the application of Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] IRLR 934 CA
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Redfearn v Serco Ltd t/a West Yorkshire Transport Service [2006] IRLR 623 CA
Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group plc and other appeals [2003] IRLR 484 HL
Richmond Pharmacology Ltd v Dhaliwal [2009] IRLR 336 EAT
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL 
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Thomas and another v Robinson [2003] IRLR 7 EAT
Treasury Solicitor’s Department v Chenge [2007] IRLR 386 EAT
Weathersfield Ltd t/a Van & Truck Rentals v Sargent [1999] IRLR 94 CA
Wetstein v (1) Misprestige Management Services Ltd (2) O’Farrell EAT/523/91
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA

Unfair Dismissal law

Automatic / Automatically Unfair Dismissal

jury service s.98B of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
health and safety s.100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
Sunday working reasons ss.101 of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
working time s.101A of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
pension scheme trustee s.102 of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
employee representative s.103 of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
public interest disclosure s.103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
asserting a statutory right under s.104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
National Minimum Wage s.104A of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
tax credit s.104B of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
flexible working s.104C of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
study or training s.104E of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
trade union membership or activities s.104F of the Employment Rights Act 1996;
industrial action reasons s.238A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992;
Transnational Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 1999;
asserting a right as a part-time worker Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000;
fixed-term employee Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002;
European Public Limited-Liability Company Regulations 2004;
Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004;
Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Consultation by Employers and Miscellaneous Amendment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/349);
right to be accompanied, or accompanying another, at a meeting to request to work beyond the intended date of retirement under the otherwise largely repealed Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 issued prior to 6 April 2011 and the retirement is covered by the transitional provisions in the Employment Equality (Repeal of Retirement Age Provisions) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1069))
reg.17(3) of the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/93) (s.105(7N) of the Employment Rights Act 1996).
statutory duty or restriction (s.98(2)(d) of the Employment Rights Act 1996).

Unfair Dismissal Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Employment Equality (Repeal of Retirement Age Provisions) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1069)
Employment Rights Act 1996
Employment Relations Act 1999
Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2034)
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031)
Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2007 (SI 2007/3570)
Employment Act 2008
Employment Act 2008 (Commencement No.1, Transitional Provisions and Savings) Order 2008 (SI 2008/3232)
Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/493)
Employee Study and Training (Procedural Requirements) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/155)

Unfair Dismissal Caselaw

Aegon UK Corporate Services Ltd v Roberts EAT/0278/08
Airbus UK v Webb EAT/0453/06
Airbus UK Ltd v Webb [2008] IRLR 309 CA
Awotona v South Tyneside Healthcare NHS Trust [2005] All ER (D) 221 (Feb) CA
Bolton School v Evans [2007] IRLR 140 CA
British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379 EAT
Brooks and others v British Telecommunications plc [1992] IRLR 66 CA
Burlo v Langley and another [2007] IRLR 145 CA
CA Treganowan v Robert Knee & Co Ltd [1975] IRLR 247 HC
Catamaran Cruisers Ltd v Williams and others [1994] IRLR 386 EAT
Central & North West London NHS Foundation Trust v Abimbola EAT/0542/08
Clancy v Cannock Chase Technical College and another [2001] IRLR 331 EAT
Cobley v Forward Technology Industries plc [2003] IRLR 706 CA
Constantine v McGregor Cory Ltd [2000] ICR 938 EAT
Cummings v Siemens Communications Ltd ET/3500013/10
DB Schenker Rail (UK) Ltd v Doolan EAT/0053/09
De Grasse v Stockwell Tools Ltd [1992] IRLR 269 EAT
Digital Equipment Co Ltd v Clements (No.2) [1998] IRLR 134 CA
Diosynth Limited v Thomson [2006] IRLR 284 CS
Dobie v Burns International Security Services (UK) Ltd [1984] IRLR 329 CA
Dolphin Drillings Personnel Pte Ltd v Winks and another EAT/0049/08
Duffy v Yeomans & Partners Ltd [1994] IRLR 642 CA
(1) Duncombe and others (2) Fletcher v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2010] IRLR 331 CA
Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] IRLR 498 SC
Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No. 2) [2011] IRLR 840 SC
Dunnachie v Kingston Upon Hull City Council [2004] IRLR 287 CA
Dunnachie v Kingston-upon-Hull City Council [2004] IRLR 727 HL
Dyke & Others v Hereford & Worcester County Council [1989] ICR 800
East Lindsey District Council v G E Daubney [1977] IRLR 181 EAT
Elisabeth Claire Care Management Group v Francis [2005] IRLR 858 EAT
E-Zec Medical Service Limited v Gregory EAT/0192/08
First West Yorkshire Ltd t/a First Leeds v Haigh [2008] IRLR 182 EAT
Fitzgerald v University of Kent at Canterbury [2004] IRLR 300 CA
Frames Snooker Centre v Boyce [1992] IRLR 472 EAT
G4S Justice Services (UK) Ltd v Anstey and others [2006] IRLR 588 EAT
Gisda CYF v Barratt [2009] IRLR 933 CA
Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] IRLR 1073 SC
Gover and others v Propertycare Ltd EAT/0458/05
Gover and others v Propertycare Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 286 CA
Governing Body of Hastingsbury School v Clarke EAT/0373/07 & EAT/0374/07
Hardy v Polk (Leeds) Ltd [2004] IRLR 420 EAT
Harper v Virgin Net Ltd [2004] IRLR 390 CA
Harvest Town Circle Ltd v Rutherford [2001] IRLR 599 EAT
Henderson v Connect (South Tyneside) Ltd [2010] IRLR 466 EAT
Hollister v The National Farmers’ Union [1979] IRLR 238 CA
Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones [1982] IRLR 439 EAT
J Terry v East Sussex County Council [1976] IRLR 332 EAT
James W Cook & Co (Wivenhoe) Ltd (in liquidation) v Tipper and others [1990] IRLR 386 CA
Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] IRLR 279 HL
Kelly v University of Southampton EAT/0295/07
Kelly-Madden v Manor Surgery [2007] IRLR 17 EAT
King v Royal Bank of Canada Europe Ltd EAT/0333/10
Kirklees Metropolitan Council v Radecki [2009] IRLR 555 CA
Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Trust and Secretary of State for Health [2009] IRLR 829 CA
Lakshmi v Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2008] IRLR 956 QB
London Probation Board v Kirkpatrick [2005] IRLR 443 EAT
Loosley v Social Action for Health EAT/0378/06
Mason v Governing Body of Ward End Primary School [2006] IRLR 432 EAT
Mattu v University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 2068 HC
McAdie v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2007] IRLR 895 CA
M-Choice UK Ltd v Aalders EAT/0227/11
Melia v Magna Kansei Ltd [2006] IRLR 117 CA
Miller v Governing Body of the Ridings High School EAT/0204/08
Monie v Coral Racing Ltd [1980] IRLR 464 CA
Morgans v Alpha Plus Security Ltd [2005] IRLR 234 EAT
Mugford v Midland Bank plc [1997] IRLR 208 EAT
Ngengfack v London Borough of Southwark [2002] EWCA Civ 711 CA
Orr v Milton Keynes Council [2011] IRLR 317 CA
Pacitti Jones v O’Brien [2005] IRLR 888 CS
Palfrey v Transco plc [2004] IRLR 916 EAT
Parr v Whitbread plc t/a Threshers Wine Merchants [1990] IRLR 39 EAT
Perkin v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2005] IRLR 934 CA
Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd (formerly Edmund Walker (Holdings) Ltd) [1987] IRLR 503 HL
Port of London Authority v Payne and others [1994] IRLR 9 CA
Port of Tilbury (London) Ltd v Birch and others [2005] IRLR 92 EAT
Post Office v Foley; HSBC Bank plc (formerly Midland Bank plc) v Madden [2000] IRLR 827 CA
Radecki v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council EAT/0114/08
Raspin v United News Shops Ltd [1999] IRLR 9 EAT
RJ Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd [1973] IRLR 379 CA
Rolls-Royce Ltd v Walpole [1980] IRLR 343 EAT
R (on the application of G) v Governors of X School and Y City Council [2010] IRLR 222 CA
R (on the application of G) v Governors of X School and Y City Council [2011] IRLR 756 SC
Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc v Payne [2005] IRLR 848 EAT
Rutherford v Towncircle Ltd (t/a Harvest) (in liquidation) and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No.2); Bentley v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2002] IRLR 768 ET
Rutherford and another v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No.2) [2004] IRLR 892 CA
Rutherford and another v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No.2) [2006] IRLR 551 HL
Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt [2003] IRLR 23 CA
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] IRLR 721 CA
Sarkar v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] IRLR 508 CA
Savage v J Sainsbury Ltd [1980] IRLR 109 CA
Scope v Thornett [2007] IRLR 155 CA
Secretary of State for Justice v Mansfield EAT/0539/09
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Rutherford and others (No.2) [2003] IRLR 858 EAT
Serco Ltd v Lawson; Botham v Ministry of Defence; Crofts and others v Veta Ltd and others [2006] IRLR 289 HL
Sheffield Forgemasters International Ltd v Fox; Telindus Ltd v Brading [2009] IRLR 192 EAT
Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews and others [2007] IRLR 568 EAT
Steel Stockholders (Birmingham) Ltd v Kirkwood [1993] IRLR 515 EAT
Strouthos v London Underground Ltd [2004] IRLR 636 CA
Stuart Peters Ltd v Bell [2009] IRLR 941 CA
Taylor v Alidair Ltd [1978] IRLR 82 CA
Taylor v OCS Group Ltd [2006] IRLR 613 CA
Tayside Regional Council v McIntosh [1982] IRLR 272 EAT
Voith Turbo Ltd v Stowe [2005] IRLR 228 EAT
W Devis & Sons Ltd v RA Atkins [1977] IRLR 314 HL
Wall v British Compressed Air Society [2004] IRLR 147 CA
Wang v University of Keele [2011] IRLR 542 EAT
Whitbread plc (t/a Whitbread Medway Inns) v Hall [2001] IRLR 275 CA
Williams and others v Compair Maxam Ltd [1982] IRLR 83 EAT

Breach of Contract and Notice Period Legislation

Employment Rights Act 1996
Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 SI 1994/1623
Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Breach of Contract and Notice Period caselaw

Campbell v Frisbee [2002] EWHC 328
Cerberus Software Ltd v Rowley [2001] IRLR 160 CA
CRS Computers Ltd v MacKenzie [2002] All ER (D) 173 (May) EAT
Delaney v Staples (t/a De Montfort Recruitment) [1992] IRLR 191 HL
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2009] EWHC 2011 HC
Fraser v HLMAD Ltd {2006] IRLR 687 CA
General Billposting Co Ltd v Atkinson [1909] AC 118 HL
Geys v Société Générale, London Branch [2010] IRLR 950 HC
Harper v Virgin Net Ltd [2004] IRLR 390 CA
Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald International [2004] IRLR 942 CA
Hutchings v Coinseed Ltd [1998] IRLR 190 CA
Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] IRLR 279 HL
Laws v London Chronicle (Indicator Newspapers) Ltd [1959] 1 WLR 698 CA
Micklefield v SAC Technology Ltd [1990] IRLR 218 HC
Morrish v NTL Group Ltd [2007] CSIH 56 CS
Murray v Leisureplay plc [2005] IRLR 946 CA
Publicis Consultants UK Ltd v O’Farrell EAT/0430/10
Raspin v United News Shops Ltd [1999] IRLR 9 EAT
Richardson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Delaney [2001] IRLR 663 HC
Robb v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [1991] IRLR 72 HC
Sinclair v Neighbour [1967] 2 QB 279 CA
Small and others v Boots Co plc and another [2009] IRLR 328 EAT
Société Genérale, London Branch v Geys [2011] IRLR 482 CA

ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure

Sexual Orientation Discrimination Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Human Rights Act 1998
Civil Partnership Act 2004
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1661)
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2827)
Civil Partnership Act 2004 (Amendments to Subordinate Legislation) Order 2005 (SI 2005/2114)

Sexual Orientation Discrimination Caselaw
Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Ahsan v Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of other members of the Labour Party) [2008] IRLR 243 HL
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
British Airways plc v Mak and others EAT/0055/09
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Brooks v Findlay Industries UK Ltd [2005] ET/1304323/04
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Burton and Rhule v De Vere Hotels [1996] IRLR 596 EAT
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd [2008] IRLR 342 EAT
English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd [2009] IRLR 206 CA
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Grant v HM Land Registry and Equality and Human Rights Commission [2011] IRLR 748 CA
Grant v South-West Trains Ltd [1998] IRLR 206 ECJ
Gravell v London Borough of Bexley EAT/0587/06
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
HM Land Registry v Grant [2010] IRLR 583 EAT
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
Lewis v HSBC Bank plc EAT/0364/06
Lisboa v Realpubs Ltd and others EAT/0224/10
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt Der Deutschen Bühnen [2008] IRLR 450 ECJ
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
R (on the application of Amicus – MSF section and others) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and Christian Action Research Education and others [2004] IRLR 430 HC
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Reaney v Hereford Diocesan Board of Finance [2007] ET/1602844/06
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2010] IRLR 132 CA
Whitehead v Brighton Marine Palace and Pier Co Ltd [2005] ET/3102595/04
Whitfield v Cleanaway UK [2005] ET/3201666/04
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
XY v AB Bank [2006] ET/3200440/2005
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA
Guidance
Equality Act 2010 explanatory notes (PDF format, 564K) (on the National Archives website)
Employment statutory code of practice (PDF format, 1.09MB) (on the EHRC website)
Equality Act 2010: What do I need to know? A quick start guide to using positive action in recruitment and promotion (PDF format, 338K) (on the Home Office website)
A step by step practical guide to using positive action when making appointments (PDF format, 250K) (on the Home Office website)
Documents
Equal opportunities policy
Dignity at work policy

Sexual Orientation Discrimination Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Human Rights Act 1998
Civil Partnership Act 2004
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1661)
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2827)
Civil Partnership Act 2004 (Amendments to Subordinate Legislation) Order 2005 (SI 2005/2114)

Sexual Orientation Discrimination caselaw

Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Ahsan v Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of other members of the Labour Party) [2008] IRLR 243 HL
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
British Airways plc v Mak and others EAT/0055/09
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Brooks v Findlay Industries UK Ltd [2005] ET/1304323/04
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Burton and Rhule v De Vere Hotels [1996] IRLR 596 EAT
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd [2008] IRLR 342 EAT
English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd [2009] IRLR 206 CA
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Grant v HM Land Registry and Equality and Human Rights Commission [2011] IRLR 748 CA
Grant v South-West Trains Ltd [1998] IRLR 206 ECJ
Gravell v London Borough of Bexley EAT/0587/06
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
HM Land Registry v Grant [2010] IRLR 583 EAT
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
Lewis v HSBC Bank plc EAT/0364/06
Lisboa v Realpubs Ltd and others EAT/0224/10
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt Der Deutschen Bühnen [2008] IRLR 450 ECJ
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
R (on the application of Amicus – MSF section and others) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and Christian Action Research Education and others [2004] IRLR 430 HC
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Reaney v Hereford Diocesan Board of Finance [2007] ET/1602844/06
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2010] IRLR 132 CA
Whitehead v Brighton Marine Palace and Pier Co Ltd [2005] ET/3102595/04
Whitfield v Cleanaway UK [2005] ET/3201666/04
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
XY v AB Bank [2006] ET/3200440/2005
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA

Equality Act 2010 explanatory notes
Employment statutory code of practice

Equality Act 2010: What do I need to know? A quick start guide to using positive action in recruitment and promotion
A step by step practical guide to using positive action when making appointments

Discrimination Remedies Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Employment Protection (Recoupment of Job Seeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/2349)
Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/2803)
Court Funds Rules 1987 (SI 1987/821)
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1661)

Discrimination Remedies Caselaw

Aegon UK Corp Services Ltd v Roberts [2009] IRLR 1042 CA
Aegon UK Corporate Services Ltd v Roberts EAT/0278/08
Al Jumard v Clywd Leisure Ltd and others [2008] IRLR 345 EAT
Armitage, Marsden and HM Prison Service v Johnson [1997] IRLR 162 EAT
Bainbridge and others v Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council (No.2) [2007] IRLR 494 EAT
Bamber v Fuji International Finance plc [1996] ET/28081/94
Boyle and others v Equal Opportunities Commission [1998] IRLR 717 ECJ
Brash-Hall v Getty Images Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 531 CA
British Telecommunications plc v Reid [2004] IRLR 327 CA
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Carney v Rouf and another [2005] All ER (D) 127 (Jan) EAT
Chagger v Abbey National plc and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1202 CA
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Vento (No.2) [2002] IRLR 177 EAT
Council of the City of Newcastle upon Tyne v Allan and others; Degnan and others v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council [2005] IRLR 504 EAT
Da’Bell v NSPCC [2010] IRLR 19 EAT
Deane v London Borough of Ealing and another [1993] IRLR 209 EAT
Debique v Ministry of Defence EAT/0075/11
Defrenne v Sabena (No.2) [1976] ECR 455 ECJ
Doshoki v Draeger Ltd [2002] IRLR 340 EAT
Essa v Laing Ltd [2004] IRLR 313 CA
Fasipe v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority [2001] ET/2304129/98
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Greenhof v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2006] IRLR 98 EAT
Handels-Og Kontorfunktionærernes Forbund I Danmark, acting on behalf of Høj Pedersen v Fællesforeningen For Danmarks Brugsforeninger, acting on behalf of Kvickly Skive [1999] IRLR 55 ECJ
Hannah v Motorola [1998] ET/1200787/98
Hatherley v Bounty Services Ltd [1998] ET/1701750/97
Hayward v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd [1988] IRLR 257 HL
HM Prison Service v Beart (No.2) [2005] IRLR 568 CA
ICTS (UK) Ltd v Tchoula [2000] IRLR 643 EAT
Jones v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police [1999] ET/1201171/98
Kelly v Centuryan Security Services Ltd [2000] ET/2300037/99
Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2001] UKHL 29
London Borough of Hackney v Sivanandan and others [2011] IRLR 740 EAT
London Borough of Southwark v Ayton EAT/515/03
Ministry of Defence v Fletcher EAT/0044/09
Ministry of Defence v Meredith [1995] IRLR 539 EAT
(1) Munchkins Restaurant Ltd (2) Moss v Karmazyn and others EAT/0359/09
North Western Health Board v McKenna [2005] IRLR 895 ECJ
Pointon v The University of Sussex [1979] IRLR 119 CA
Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd (formerly Edmund Walker (Holdings) Ltd) [1987] IRLR 503 HL
Prest and others v (1) Mouchel Business Services Ltd (2) Middlesbrough Borough Council EAT/0604/10
Preston and others v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust and others (No.2) [2001] IRLR 237 HL
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 HL
Saiger v North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust EAT/0325/10
Scott v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [2004] IRLR 713 CA
Sheffield Forgemasters International Ltd v Fox; Telindus Ltd v Brading [2009] IRLR 192 EAT
Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd [1999] IRLR 481 CA
Sibbit v The Governing Body of St Cuthbert’s Catholic Primary School EAT/0070/10
St Andrews Catholic Primary School and others v Blundell EAT/0330/09
Stubbs v (1) Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police and (2) Walker [1999] ET/38395/96
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v Mylott EAT/0352/09 & EAT/0399/10
Taylor v XLN Telecom Ltd and others [2010] IRLR 499 EAT
Unison and another v Brennan and others [2008] IRLR 492 EAT
University of the Arts London v Rule EAT/0245/10
Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (No.2) [2003] IRLR 102 CA
Virdi v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2000] ET/2202774/98
Virgo Fidelis Senior School v Boyle [2004] IRLR 268 EAT
Wardle v Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank [2011] IRLR 604 CA
Zaiwalla & Co and another v Walia [2002] IRLR 697 EAT

Discrimination Tribunal Procedure Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2006
Equality Act 2010 (Obtaining Information) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2194)
Mental Capacity Act 2005
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246)
Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Race Relations Act 1976
Disability Discrimination Act 1995
Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660)
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1661)
Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031)
Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1861)

Discrimination Tribunal Procedure Caselaw

A v B and another [2010] EWCA Civ 1378 CA
Aziz v First Division Association (FDA) [2010] EWCA Civ 304 CA
Abbey National plc and another v Chagger [2009] IRLR 86 EAT
Apelogun-Gabriels v London Borough of Lambeth and another [2002] IRLR 116 CA
Barton v Investec Henderson Crosthwaite Securities Ltd [2003] IRLR 332 EAT
Berry v (1) Recruitment Revolution (2) PTS Consulting (UK) Ltd (3) Wells Tobias Recruitment (4) Ruston Hemmings and Carlton Kay Recruitment EAT/0190/0419/0420 & 0421/10
British School of Motoring v Fowler EAT/0059/06
Carrington v Helix Lighting Ltd [1990] IRLR 6 EAT
Cast v Croydon College [1998] IRLR 318 CA
Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Caston [2010] IRLR 327 CA
Chohan v Derby Law Centre [2004] IRLR 685 EAT
Clyde & Co LLP and another v Bates Van Winkelhof [2011] IRLR 467 HC
Daleside Nursing Home Limited v Mathew EAT/0159/08
Derby Specialist Fabrication Ltd v Burton [2001] IRLR 69 EAT
Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein Ltd v Adebayo [2005] IRLR 514 EAT
D’Silva v NATFHE [2008] IRLR 412 EAT
Dunedin Canmore Housing Association v Donaldson EAT/0014/09
East Dunbartonshire Council v (1) Trade Union backed claimants (2) Stefan Cross claimants EATS/0005/10
Edozie v G4S Security Services (UK) Ltd and another EAT/0124/09
Grimshaw v Griffin Signs Ltd and others EAT/0299/08
Gutridge and others v Sodexo Ltd and another [2009] IRLR 721 CA
Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2003] IRLR 96 CA
Hammonds LLP and others v Mwitta EAT/0026/10
Hooper v Sherborne School EAT/1375/08
Igen Ltd (formerly Leeds Careers Guidance) and others v Wong and other cases [2005] IRLR 258 CA
King v The Great Britain-China Centre [1991] IRLR 513 CA
Lyfar v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 1548 CA
Madarassy v Nomura International plc [2007] IRLR 246 CA
Matuszowicz v Kingston Upon Hull City Council [2009] IRLR 288 CA
McMaster & others v Perth & Kinross Council EATS/0026/08
Middlesbrough Borough Council v Surtees and others (No.2) [2007] IRLR 981 EAT
(1) Milton Keynes General Hospital NHS Trust (2) Punchard v Maruziva EAT/0003/09
(1) Munchkins Restaurant Ltd (2) Moss v Karmazyn and others EAT/0359/09
Newsquest (Herald and Times) Limited v Keeping EATS/0051/10
Nicolson Highlandwear Ltd v Nicolson [2010] IRLR 859 EAT
North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust v Fox and others sub nom Potter and others v North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust and others (No.2) [2010] IRLR 804 CA
Nottinghamshire County Council v Meikle [2004] IRLR 703 CA
Okonu v G4S Security Services (UK) Ltd EAT/0035/07
Oyarce v Cheshire County Council [2008] IRLR 653 CA
Pothecary Witham Weld and another v Bullimore and another and the Equality and Human Rights Commission [2010] IRLR 572 EAT
Potter and others v North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust and others (No.2) [2009] IRLR 900 EAT
Powerhouse Retail Limited and others v Burroughs and others [2006] IRLR 381 HL
Preston and others v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust and others (No.2) [2001] IRLR 237 HL
Slack and others v Cumbria County Council and Equality and Human Rights Commission sub nom Cumbria County Council v Dow (No.2) [2009] IRLR 463 CA
Sodexo Ltd v Gutridge and others [2008] IRLR 752 EAT
Swithland Motors plc v Clarke and others [1994] IRLR 275 EAT
Tradition Securities and Futures SA v X and another [2008] IRLR 934 EAT
Unison v Allen and others [2007] IRLR 975 EAT
West Midlands Passenger Transport Executive v Singh [1988] IRLR 186 CA
Wilsons Solicitors v Johnson and others EAT/0515/10
X v Stevens [2003] IRLR 411 EAT
Yerrakalva v (1) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (2) Governing Body of Dearne Carrfield Primary School EAT/0231/10

Disability Discrimination Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/2128)
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Disability Discrimination Act 1995
Disability Discrimination Act 2005
Disability Discrimination (Meaning of Disability) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/1455)
Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78)
Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1673)
Disability Discrimination (Blind and Partially Sighted Persons) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/712)
Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Pensions) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2770)
Protection from Harassment Act 1997

Disability Discriminationn Caselaw

Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis EAT/0226/09
Allen v Hounga EAT/0326/10
Anya v University of Oxford and another [2001] IRLR 377 CA
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Archibald v Fife Council [2004] IRLR 651 HL
Arthur v Northern Ireland Housing Executive 29 June 2007 NICA
Attridge Law and another v Coleman [2007] IRLR 88 EAT
Aylott v Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council [2010] IRLR 994 CA
Beales v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions EAT/0602/05
Bradley v Greater Manchester Fire and Civil Defence Authority EAT/253/00
British Airways plc v Mak and others EAT/0055/09
British Gas Services Ltd v McCaull [2001] IRLR 60 EAT
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Burton and Rhule v De Vere Hotels [1996] IRLR 596 EAT
Callagan v Glasgow City Council [2001] IRLR 724 EAT
Cave v Goodwin [2001] EWCA Civ 391 CA
Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA [2006] IRLR 706 ECJ
Chief Constable of Dumfries & Galloway Constabulary v Adams [2009] IRLR 612 EAT
Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Weaver EAT/0622/07
Chief Constable of Lothian and Border Police v Cumming [2010] IRLR 109 EAT
City of Edinburgh Council v Dickson EATS/0038/09
Clark v TDG Ltd t/a Novacold [1999] IRLR 318 CA
Coca-Cola Enterprises Ltd v Shergill EAT/0003/02
Coleman v Attridge Law and another [2008] IRLR 722 ECJ
Collins v Royal National Theatre Board Ltd [2004] IRLR 395 CA
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Cordell v Foreign and Commonwealth Office EAT/0016/11
Cosgrove v Caesar & Howie [2001] IRLR 653 EAT
Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd [2002] IRLR 24 EAT
Cunningham v Ballylaw Foods Ltd 31 January 2007 NICA
De Keyser Ltd v Wilson [2001] IRLR 324 EAT
Department for Work and Pensions v Hall EAT/0012/05
EA Gibson Shipbrokers Ltd v Staples EAT/0263/07
Eastern And Coastal Kent Primary Care Trust v Grey [2009] IRLR 429 EAT
EBR Attridge Law LLP and another v Coleman (No.2) [2010] IRLR 10 EAT
Edmund Nuttall Limited v Butterfield [2005] IRLR 751 EAT
Ekpe v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2001] IRLR 605 EAT
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
Environment Agency v Rowan [2008] IRLR 20 EAT
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Fareham College Corporation v Walters [2009] IRLR 991 EAT
Fowler v London Borough of Waltham Forest EAT/0116/06
Garrett v Lidl Ltd EAT/0541/08
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Goodwin v The Patent Office [1999] IRLR 4 EAT
Grant v McKechnie Plastic Components EAT/0390/09
Gravell v London Borough of Bexley EAT/0587/06
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
HJ Heinz Co Ltd v Kenrick [2000] IRLR 144 EAT
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hanlon v Kirklees Metropolitan Council and others [2004] All ER (D) 154 (Sep) EAT
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
Hart v Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary EAT/0403/07
Hart v Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary [2008] EWCA Civ 929 CA
Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust [2005] IRLR 293 CA
Hay v Surrey County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 93 CA
Heggie v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) EAT/0482/07
Hewett v Motorola Ltd [2004] IRLR 545 EAT
High Quality Lifestyles Ltd v Watts [2006] IRLR 850 EAT
Hill v Clacton Family Trust Ltd [2005] All ER (D) 170 (Oct) CA
Hinsley v Chief Constable of West Mercia Constabulary EAT/0200/10
HM Land Registry v Wakefield EAT/0530/07
HM Prison Service v Beart EAT/650/01
HM Prison Service v Johnson [2007] IRLR 951 EAT
Hospice of St Mary of Furness v Howard [2007] IRLR 944 EAT
J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] IRLR 936 EAT
Jelic v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police EAT/0491/09
Jones v Post Office [2001] IRLR 384 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth [2000] IRLR 14 EAT
Keane v United Lincolnshire Hospital NHS Trust [2002] ET/2601176/01
Kirton v Tetrosyl Ltd [2003] IRLR 353 CA
Kenny v Hampshire Constabulary [1999] IRLR 76 EAT
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] IRLR 700 HL
London Borough of Redbridge v Baynes EAT/0293/09
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
McKechnie Plastic Components v Grant EAT/0284/08
Mid Staffordshire General Hospitals NHS Trust v Cambridge [2003] IRLR 566 EAT
Millar v Inland Revenue Commissioners [2006] IRLR 112 CS
Ministry of Defence v Wallis and another [2011] EWCA Civ 231 CA
Morgan v Staffordshire University [2002] IRLR 190 EAT
Morse v Wiltshire County Council [1998] IRLR 352 EAT
Mowat-Brown v University of Surrey [2002] IRLR 235 EAT
Murray v Newham Citizens Advice Bureau Ltd [2003] IRLR 340 EAT
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
Nottinghamshire County Council v Meikle [2004] IRLR 703 CA
NTL Group Ltd v Difolco [2006] EWCA Civ 1508 CA
O’Hanlon v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs [2007] IRLR 404 CA
O’Hanlon v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs [2006] IRLR 840 EAT
O’Neill v Symm & Co Ltd [1998] IRLR 233 EAT
Paterson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] IRLR 763 EAT
Patel v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and another [2010] IRLR 280 EAT
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
Poulton v Walton [1998] ET/1805515/97
Power v Panasonic UK Ltd [2003] IRLR 151 EAT
Project Management Institute v Latif [2007] IRLR 579 EAT
Quinn v Schwarzkopf Ltd [2001] IRLR 67 EAT
Quinn v Schwarzkopf Ltd [2002] IRLR 602 CS
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Richmond Adult Community College v McDougall [2008] IRLR 227 CA
Ridout v T C Group [1998] IRLR 628 EAT
Romec Ltd v Rudham EAT/0069/07
Rowden v Dutton Gregory [2002] ICR 971 EAT
Royal Bank of Scotland v Ashton EAT/0542/09 & EAT/0306/10
Royal Liverpool Children’s NHS Trust v Dunsby [2006] IRLR 351 EAT
Salford NHS Primary Care Trust v Smith EAT/0507/10
Scottish and Southern Energy plc v Mackay EATS/0075/06
Secretary of State for the Department for Work and Pensions v Alam [2010] IRLR 283 EAT
Serco Ltd v Lawson; Botham v Ministry of Defence; Crofts and others v Veta Ltd and others [2006] IRLR 289 HL
Smith v Churchills Stairlifts plc [2006] IRLR 41 CA
Southampton City College v Randall [2006] IRLR 18 EAT
Surrey Police v Marshall [2002] IRLR 843 EAT
Tarbuck v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd [2006] IRLR 664 EAT
Taylor v OCS Group Ltd [2006] IRLR 613 CA
The Child Support Agency (Dudley) v Truman EAT/0293/08
Governing Body of X Endowed Primary School v Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal and others [2009] IRLR 1007 HC
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2010] IRLR 132 CA
Vicary v British Telecommunications plc [1999] IRLR 680 EAT
Williams v University of Nottingham [2007] IRLR 660 EAT
Williams v YKK (UK) Ltd [2003] All ER (D) 141 (Mar) EAT
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA

Religious Discrimination Legislation

Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC)
The Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Equality Act 2006
Protection from Harassment Act 1997
Race Relations Act 1976
Human Rights Act 1998
Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660)
Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2828)

Religious Discrimination Caselaw

Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Ahmad v UK [1982] 4 EHRR 126 ECHR
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Azmi v Kirklees Metropolitan Council ET/1801450/06
Baggs v Dr FDA Fudge [2005] ET/1400114/05
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
British Airways plc v Mak and others EAT/0055/09
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Brooks v Findlay Industries UK Ltd [2005] ET/1304323/04
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Burton and Rhule v De Vere Hotels [1996] IRLR 596 EAT
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Cherfi v G4S Security Services Ltd EAT/0379/10
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Chondol v Liverpool City Council EAT/0298/08
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Eweida v British Airways plc ET/2702689/06
Eweida v British Airways plc [2009] IRLR 78 EAT
Eweida v British Airways plc [2010] EWCA Civ 80 CA
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Glasgow City Council v McNab [2007] IRLR 476 EAT
Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] IRLR 4 EAT
Gravell v London Borough of Bexley EAT/0587/06
Greater Manchester Police v Power EAT/0434/09
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
Harris v NKL Automotive Ltd and Matrix Consultancy UK Ltd EAT/0134/07
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
James v MSC Cruises Ltd [2006] ET/2203173/05
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Jones v University of Manchester [1993] IRLR 218 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Ladele v London Borough of Islington ET/2203694/07
Ladele v London Borough of Islington [2009] EWCA Civ 1357 CA
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
London Borough of Islington v Ladele and Liberty [2009] IRLR 154 EAT
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
McClintock v Department of Constitutional Affairs [2008] IRLR 29 EAT
McFarlane v Relate Avon [2010] IRLR 196 EAT
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] IRLR 872 CA
Mohmed v West Coast Trains Ltd EAT/0682/06
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
Power v Greater Manchester Police ET/2404433/09
Power v Greater Manchester Police Authority EAT/0087/10
R (on the application of Amicus – MSF section and others) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and Christian Action Research Education and others [2004] IRLR 430 HC
R on the application of E v (1) The Governing Body of JFS (2) The Admissions Appeal Panel of JFS [2009] EWCA Civ 626 CA
R on the application of E v (1) The Governing Body of JFS (2) The Admissions Appeal Panel of JFS [2009] UKSC 15 SC
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd v Coutinho [2009] EWCA Civ 454 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Saini v All Saints Haque Centre and others [2009] IRLR 74 EAT
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Stedman v UK [1997] 23 EHRR 168 ECHR
Treasury Solicitor’s Department v Chenge [2007] IRLR 386 EAT
TW Nicholson v Grainger Plc and others ET/2203367/08
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2010] IRLR 132 CA
Weathersfield Ltd t/a Van & Truck Rentals v Sargent [1999] IRLR 94 CA
Williams v South Central Limited [2004] ET/2306989/03
Williams-Drabble v Pathway Care Solutions Ltd [2005] ET/2601718/04
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA

Age Discrimination Legislation
Employment Equality (Repeal of Retirement Age Provisions) 2011 (SI 2011/1069)
Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act (Age Exceptions for Pension Schemes) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2133)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Equality Act 2010 (Commencement No.4, Savings, Consequential, Transitional, Transitory and Incidental Provisions and Revocations) Order (SI 2010/2317) Equality Act 2010 (Age Exceptions for Pension Schemes) (Amendment) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2285)
Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC)
Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031)
Employment Equality (Age) (Amendment No.2) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2931)
Sex Discrimination Act 1975
Race Relations Act 1976
Protection from Harassment Act 1997

Age Discrimination Caselaw

(1) ABN Amro Management Services Ltd (2) The Royal Bank of Scotland v Hogben EAT/0266/09
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
Bloxham v Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer [2007] ET/2205086/06
BM Price v (1) The Civil Service Commission and (2) The Society of Civil and Public Servants [1977] IRLR 291 EAT
British Airways plc v Mak and others EAT/0055/09
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Burton and Rhule v De Vere Hotels [1996] IRLR 596 EAT
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Beck EAT/0141/10
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Homer [2009] IRLR 262 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Court v Dennis Publishing Ltd [2007] ET/2200327/07
Cunningham v BMS Sales 1 February 2007 Irish Equality Tribunal
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Gravell v London Borough of Bexley EAT/0587/06
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
Hammonds LLP and others v Mwitta EAT/0026/10
Hampton v Lord Chancellor and another [2008] IRLR 258 ET
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2010] IRLR 619 CA
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Johns v Solent SD Ltd [2008] EAT IRLR 88 EAT
Johns v Solent SD Ltd [2008] IRLR 820 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Kraft Foods UK Ltd v Hastie EAT/0024/10
Kücükdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co KG [2010] IRLR 346 ECJ
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
Live Nation (Venues) UK Ltd and other appeals EAT/0234/08, EAT/0235/08 & EAT/0236/08
Loxley v BAE Systems (Munitions & Ordnance) Ltd [2008] IRLR 853 EAT
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
McCoy v James McGregor & Sons Ltd & ors Case Ref: 237/07
MacCulloch v Imperial Chemical Industries plc [2008] IRLR 846 EAT
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Wooster [2009] IRLR 980 EAT
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Nash v Mash/Roe Group Ltd [1998] IRLR 168 IT
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA [2007] IRLR 989 ECJ
Perera v (1) Civil Service Commission (2) The Department of Customs and Excise [1982] IRLR 147 EAT
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
Prigge and others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG [2011] IRLR 1052 ECJ
Pulham and others v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2010] IRLR 184 EAT
R (on the application of Age UK) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2009] EWHC 2336 HC
R (on the application of the Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform [2009] IRLR 373 ECJ
R (on the application of Unison) v First Secretary of State [2006] IRLR 926 HC
Rainbow v Milton Keynes Council [2008] ET/1200104/07
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd v Coutinho [2009] EWCA Civ 454 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Rolls Royce plc v Unite [2009] EWCA Civ 387 CA
Rolls Royce plc v Unite the Union [2009] IRLR 49 HC
Rosenbladt v Oellerking Gebäudereinigungsges mbH [2011] IRLR 51 ECJ
Rutherford and another v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No.2) [2006] IRLR 551 HL
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes ET/1100275/07
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes [2009] IRLR 267 EAT
Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes and Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2010] IRLR 865 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Standard Life Bank Ltd v Wilson EATS/0017/07
Taylor v Secretary of State for Scotland [2000] IRLR 502 HL
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2010] IRLR 132 CA
Vicente Pascual García v Confederación Hidrográfica del Duero Case C-87/06
Wilkinson v Springwell Engineering Ltd ET/2507420/07
Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt Am Main Case C-229/08 ECJ
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA

Pregnancy and Maternity Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)

Pregnancy and Maternity Caselaw

Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Ahsan v Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of other members of the Labour Party) [2008] IRLR 243 HL
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
British Airways plc v Mak and others EAT/0055/09
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Brooks v Findlay Industries UK Ltd [2005] ET/1304323/04
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Burton and Rhule v De Vere Hotels [1996] IRLR 596 EAT
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd [2008] IRLR 342 EAT
English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd [2009] IRLR 206 CA
Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] IRLR 327 HC
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Grant v South-West Trains Ltd [1998] IRLR 206 ECJ
Gravell v London Borough of Bexley EAT/0587/06
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
HM Land Registry v Grant [2010] IRLR 583 EAT
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Kulikaoskas v Macduff Shellfish and another EATS/0062/09 & EATS/0063/09
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
Lewis v HSBC Bank plc EAT/0364/06
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt Der Deutschen Bühnen [2008] IRLR 450 ECJ
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Neary v Service Children’s Education and others [2010] IRLR 1030 EAT
Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitors and another EAT/0108/10
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
R (on the application of Amicus – MSF section and others) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and Christian Action Research Education and others [2004] IRLR 430 HC
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Reaney v Hereford Diocesan Board of Finance [2007] ET/1602844/06
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2010] IRLR 132 CA
Whitehead v Brighton Marine Palace and Pier Co Ltd [2005] ET/3102595/04
Whitfield v Cleanaway UK [2005] ET/3201666/04
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
XY v AB Bank [2006] ET/3200440/2005
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA

Marriage and Civil Partnership Discrimination Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Equality Act 2006
Protection from Harassment Act 1997
Civil Partnership Act 2004
Civil Partnership Act 2004 (Amendments to Subordinate Legislation) Order 2005 (SI 2005/2114)
Recast Equal Opportunities and Equal Treatment Directive 2006/54/EC (consolidates the Equal Pay Directive (75/117/EEC), the Equal Treatment Directive (76/207/EEC) and the Burden of Proof Directive (97/80/EC), which were repealed by the recast Directive with effect from 15 August 2009)
Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC)

Marriage and Civil Partnership Discrimination Caselaw

Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Ahsan v Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of other members of the Labour Party) [2008] IRLR 243 HL
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Bruce v Addleshaw Booth & Co [2004] All ER (D) 218 (May) EAT
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd [2000] IRLR 578 CA
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
R (on the application of Amicus – MSF section and others) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and Christian Action Research Education and others [2004] IRLR 430 HC
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Reaney v Hereford Diocesan Board of Finance [2007] ET/1602844/06
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2010] IRLR 132 CA
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA
Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 CA

Gender Reassignment Discrimination Legislation

Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010 (Offshore Work) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1835)
Equality Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments, Saving and Supplementary Provisions) Order 2010 (SI 2010/2279)
Gender Recognition Act 2004
Protection from Harassment Act 1997
Recast Equal Opportunities and Equal Treatment Directive 2006/54/EC (consolidates the Equal Pay Directive (75/117/EEC), the Equal Treatment Directive (76/207/EEC) and the Burden of Proof Directive (97/80/EC), which were repealed by the recast Directive with effect from 15 August 2009)
Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC)

Gender Reassignment Discrimination Caselaw
Abbey Life Assurance Co Ltd v Tansell [2000] IRLR 387 CA
Ahsan v Watt (formerly Carter) (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of other members of the Labour Party) [2008] IRLR 243 HL
Anyanwu and another v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305 HL
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] IRLR 800 CA
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
Canniffe v East Riding of Yorkshire Council [2000] IRLR 555 EAT
Chessington World of Adventures Ltd v Reed ex parte News Group Newspapers Ltd [1998] IRLR 56 EAT
Chief Constable of the Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs and others [1999] IRLR 81 EAT
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] IRLR 830 HL
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v Vento [2001] IRLR 124 EAT
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another v Morgan [2002] IRLR 776 EAT
Conteh v Parking Partners Ltd EAT/0288/10
Croft v Royal Mail Group plc [2003] IRLR 592 CA
Cross and others v British Airways plc [2005] IRLR 423 EAT
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd EAT/0298/10
Garry v London Borough of Ealing [2001] IRLR 681 CA
Gilbank v Miles [2006] IRLR 538 CA
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd [2006] IRLR 764 HC
Hallam and another v Cheltenham Borough Council and others [2001] IRLR 312 HL
Hammond v International Network Services UK Ltd [2007] EWHC 2604 HC
HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun [2008] IRLR 940 EAT
Honda Motor Europe v McMillan EAT/0471/06
Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence [1979] IRLR 436 CA
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] IRLR 168 CA
Jones v University of Manchester [1993] IRLR 218 CA
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
Lana v Positive Action Training in Housing (London) Ltd [2001] IRLR 501 EAT
Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland; Pearce v Governing Body of Mayfield School [2003] IRLR 512 HL
Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] IRLR 695 HL
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
Muschett v HM Prison Service [2010] IRLR 451 CA
Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] IRLR 572 HL
P v S and Cornwall County Council [1996] IRLR 347 ECJ
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) and another [2011] IRLR 284 EAT
Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd and others v Coutinho [2009] IRLR 672 CA
Rayment v Ministry of Defence [2010] IRLR 768 HC
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] IRLR 285 HL
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and Others [2005] IRLR 801 CA
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council v Derbyshire and others [2007] IRLR 540 HL
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2011] IRLR 119 EAT
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA

Public Interest Disclosure / Whistle Blowing Legislation

Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Employment Rights Act 1996
Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Persons) Order 1999 SI 1999/1549
Public Interest Disclosure (Compensation) Regulations 1999 SI 1999/1548
Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Persons) (Amendment) Order 2003 SI 2003/1993
Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Persons) (Amendment) Order 2004 SI 2004/3265
Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Persons) (Amendment) Order 2005 SI 2005/2464
Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Persons) (Amendment) Order 2008 SI 2008/531

Public Interest Disclosure / Whistle Blowing Caselaw

ALM Medical Services Ltd v Bladon [2002] IRLR 807 CA
Babula v Waltham Forest College [2007] IRLR 346 CA
Bolton School v Evans [2007] IRLR 140 CA
BP plc v Elstone and another [2010] IRLR 558 EAT
Cavendish Munro Professional Risks Management Ltd v Geduld [2010] IRLR 38 EAT
Easwaran v St George’s University of London EAT/0167/10
El Megrisi v Azad University (IR) in Oxford EAT/0448/08
Fecitt and others v NHS Manchester [2011] IRLR 111 EAT
Goode v Marks & Spencer plc EAT/0442/09
Hibbins v Hesters Way Neighbourhood Project [2009] IRLR 198 EAT
Kraus v Penna plc and another [2004] IRLR 260 EAT
Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] IRLR 530 CA
Meares v Medway Primary Care Trust EAT/0065/10
Miklaszewicz v Stolt Offshore Ltd [2002] IRLR 344 CS
NHS Manchester v Fecitt and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1190 CA
Parkins v Sodexho Ltd [2002] IRLR 109 EAT
Premier Mortgage Connections Ltd v Miller EAT/0113/07
Ryb v Nomura International Plc ET/3202174/2009
Street v Derbyshire Unemployed Workers’ Centre [2004] EWCA Civ 964 CA
Watkinson v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust ET/1602168/08 & ET/1702079/09
Woodward v Abbey National plc [2006] EWCA Civ 822 CA

TUPE / Transfers of Undertakings / Business Transfers Legislation
Acquired Rights Directive (2001/23/EC)
Employment Rights Act 1996
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Pension Schemes Act 1993
Pensions Act 2004
Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1999 SI 1999/1925
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1987 SI 1987/442
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 SI 1981/1794
Transfer of Employment (Pension Protection) Regulations 2005 SI 2005/649
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 SI 2006/246
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2009 SI 2009/592

TUPE / Transfers of Undertakings / Business Transfers Legislation Caselaw

Alamo Group (Europe) Ltd v Tucker and another [2003] IRLR 266 EAT
Albron Catering BV v FNV Bondgenoten and another Case C-242/09 ECJ
Amicus and another v City Building (Glasgow) LLP and others [2009] IRLR 253 EAT
Balfour Beatty Power Networks Ltd and another v Wilcox and others [2007] IRLR 63 CA
Beckmann v Dynamco Whicheloe Macfarlane Ltd [2002] IRLR 578 ECJ
Botzen v Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij BV [1986] Case C-186/83 ECJ
Brookes and others v Borough Care Services and Cls Care Services Ltd [1998] IRLR 636 EAT
Capita Health Solutions Ltd v McLean and another [2008] IRLR 595 EAT
Celtec Ltd v Astley and others [2005] IRLR 647 ECJ
Celtec Ltd v Astley and others [2006] IRLR 635 HL
Clearsprings Management Ltd v Ankers and others EAT/0054/08
Delabole Slate Ltd v Berriman [1985] IRLR 305 CA
G4S Justice Services v Anstey and others [2006] IRLR 588 EAT
Hay v George Hanson (Building Contractors) Ltd [1996] IRLR 427 EAT
Hickling t/a Imperial Day Nursery and others v Marshall EAT/0217/10
Holis Metal Industries Ltd v GMB and another [2008] IRLR 187 EAT
Howard v Millrise Ltd t/a Colourflow (in liquidation) and another [2005] IRLR 84 EAT
Hunt v (1) Storm Communications Ltd (2) Wild Card Public Relations Ltd (3) Brown Brothers Wine (Europe) Ltd ET/2702546/06
Hynd v Armstrong and others [2007] IRLR 338 CS
Jackson v Computershare Investor Services Plc [2007] EWCA Civ 1065 CA
Jouini and others v Princess Personal Service [2007] IRLR 1005
Kerry Foods Ltd v Creber and others [2000] IRLR 10 EAT
Kimberley Group Housing Ltd v Hambley and others; Angel Services (UK) Ltd v Hambley and others [2008] IRLR 682 EAT
Kirtruna SL and another v Red Elite de Electrodomésticos SA and others Case C-313/07
Klarenberg v Ferrotron Technologies GmbH Case C-466/07 ECJ
London Metropolitan University v Sackur and others EAT/0286/06
Martin and others v South Bank University [2004] IRLR 74 ECJ
McCormick and others v Scottish Coal Company Ltd [2005] All ER (D) 104 (Sep) CS
Metropolitan Resources Ltd v Churchill Dulwich Ltd (in liquidation) and others [2009] IRLR 700 EAT
Millam v Print Factory (London) 1991 Ltd [2007] IRLR 526 CA
New ISG Ltd v Vernon and others [2008] IRLR 115 HC
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust v (1) Hamshaw and others (2) Perthyn (3) Choice Support EAT/0037/11
Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd [2009] IRLR 250 EAT
Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1094 CA
OCS Group UK Limited v Jones and another EAT/0038/09
OTG Ltd v Barke and other appeals [2011] IRLR 272 EAT
Oy Liikenne Ab v Liskojärvi and Juntunen [2001] IRLR 171 ECJ
Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron and others [2010] IRLR 298 CA
Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron and others [2011] IRLR 696 SC
Pressure Coolers Ltd v Molloy and others [2011] IRLR 630 EAT
Print Factory (London) 1991 Ltd v Millam [2006] IRLR 923 EAT
RCO Support Services and another v Unison and others [2002] IRLR 401 CA
Regent Security Services Ltd v Power [2008] IRLR 66 CA
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Communication Workers Union [2009] IRLR 108 EAT
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Communication Workers Union [2009] IRLR 1046 CA
Schmidt v Spar- und Leihkasse der Früheren Ämter Bordesholm, Kiel und Cronshagen [1994] IRLR 302 ECJ
Smith and others v Trustees of Brooklands College EAT/0128/11
Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine and another EAT/0339/10
Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abbatoir CV 24/85 [1986] ECR 1119 ECJ
Süzen v Zehnacker Gebäudereinigung GmbH Krankenhausservice and Lefarth GmbH [1997] IRLR 255 ECJ
Sweetin v Coral Racing [2006] IRLR 252 EAT
Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust [2009] IRLR 972 EAT
Transport & General Workers’ Union v James McKinnon, JR (Haulage) Ltd and others [2001] IRLR 597 EAT
Ward Hadaway Solicitors v Love and others EAT/0471/09
Williams v Advance Cleaning Services Ltd and another [2005] All ER (D) 215 (Jun) EAT
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council; British Fuels Ltd v Baxendale and Meade [1998] IRLR 706 HL
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council; Meade and Baxendale v British Fuels Ltd [1997] IRLR 505 CA
Wood v Caledon Social Club Ltd and another EAT/0528/09
Zaman and others v Kozee Sleep Products Ltd (t/a Dorlux Beds UK) EAT/0312/10

Agency workers Legislation

Temporary Agency Work Directive (2008/104/EC)
Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/93)
Equality Act 2010
Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/3319)
Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003
Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833)
National Minimum Wage Act 1998
Employment Rights Act 1996

Redundancy Legislation

Employment Rights Act 1996
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Trade Union Reform and Employment Rights Act 1993
Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2587)
Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2034)
Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2007 (SI 2007/3570)
Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3426)
Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031)
Collective Redundancies (Amendment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2387)
Employment Act 2008
Employment Act 2008 (Commencement No.1, Transitional Provisions and Savings) Order 2008 (SI 2008/3232)
Equality Act 2010

Redundancy Caselaw

Akavan Erityisalojen Keskusliitto AEK Ry and others v Fujitsu Siemens Computers Oy Case C-44/08 ECJ
Amicus v GBS Tooling Ltd (in administration) [2005] IRLR 683 EAT
Cahuac and ors v Allen Amery Ltd [1966] ITR 313
Commission for Healthcare Audit & Inspection v Ward EAT/0579/07
Crawford v (1) Secretary of State for Employment and (2) Colmore Depot [1995] IRLR 523 EAT
Dabson v David Cover & Sons Ltd EAT/0374/10
De Grasse v Stockwell Tools Ltd [1992] IRLR 269 EAT
Duffy v Yeomans & Partners Ltd [1994] IRLR 642 CA
Dyke & Others v Hereford & Worcester County Council [1989] ICR 800
Eversheds Legal Services Ltd v de Belin [2011] IRLR 448 EAT
E-Zec Medical Services Limited v Gregory EAT/0192/08
First Scottish Searching Services Ltd v McDine and another EATS/0051/10
Flannery v Tetley Walker Ltd ET/27541/79
GMB v Man Truck & Bus UK Ltd [2000] IRLR 636 EAT
Haine and another v Day [2008] IRLR 642 CA
Hardy v Tourism South East [2005] IRLR 242 EAT
High Table Ltd v Horst and others [1997] IRLR 513 CA
Home Office v Evans and another [2008] IRLR 59 CA
Hutchins v Permacell Finesse Ltd (in administration) EAT/0350/07
Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Aspinall and another [2011] IRLR 716 EAT
Junk v Kühnel [2005] IRLR 310 ECJ
Kenneth MacRae & Co Ltd v Dawson [1984] IRLR 5 EAT
Kraft Foods UK Ltd v Hastie EAT/0024/10
Land Securities Trillium Ltd v Thornley [2005] IRLR 765 EAT
Leicestershire County Council v Unison [2006] IRLR 810 CA
MacCulloch v Imperial Chemical Industries plc [2008] IRLR 846 EAT
Mairs (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Haughey [1993] IRLR 551 HL
Middlesbrough Borough Council v TGWU and another [2002] IRLR 332 EAT
Morgan v Welsh Rugby Union [2011] IRLR 376 EAT
MSF v Refuge Assurance plc and another [2002] IRLR 324 EAT
Mugford v Midland Bank plc [1997] IRLR 208 EAT
Murray and another v Foyle Meats Ltd [1999] IRLR 562 HL
National Union of Teachers v Avon County Council [1978] IRLR 55 EAT
Optare Group Ltd v Transport and General Workers’ Union [2007] IRLR 931 EAT
Phillips v Xtera Communications Ltd [2011] IRLR 724 EAT
Ralph Martindale & Co Ltd v Harris EAT/0166/07
Rolls Royce plc v Unite [2009] EWCA Civ 387 CA
Rolls Royce plc v Unite the Union [2009] IRLR 49 HC
Rutherford v Towncircle Ltd (t/a Harvest) (in liquidation) and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No.2); Bentley v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2002] IRLR 768 ET
Rutherford and another v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No.2) [2004] IRLR 892 CA
Safeway Stores plc v Burrell [1997] IRLR 200 EAT
Scotch Premier Meat Ltd v Burns and others [2000] IRLR 639 EAT
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Rutherford and others (No.2) [2003] IRLR 858 EAT
Shawkat v Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust [2001] IRLR 555 CA
Susie Radin Ltd v GMB and others [2004] IRLR 400 CA
Transport & General Workers’ Union v Brauer Coley Ltd (in administration) [2007] IRLR 207 EAT
Transport & General Workers’ Union v Ledbury Preserves (1928) Ltd [1985] IRLR 412 EAT
Transport and General Workers’ Union v Morgan Platts Ltd (in administration) [2003] All ER (D) 09 (Jun) EAT
UK Coal Mining Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers (Northumberland Area) and another [2008] IRLR 4 EAT
Vauxhall Motors Ltd v Transport and General Workers’ Union [2006] IRLR 674 EAT
Williams and others v Compair Maxam Ltd [1982] IRLR 83 EAT

UPS Ltd v Harrison (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0038_11_1601 (08 June 2011)
January

Amin v Wincanton Group Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0508_10_2501 (25 January 2012)
Bivonas LLP & Ors v Bennett (Sexual Orientation Discrimination or Transexualism) [2011] UKEAT 0254_11_3101 (31 January 2012)
Collins v Club 24 Ltd (t/a Ventura) (Victimisation Discrimination) [2012] UKEAT 0028_11_1201 (12 January 2012)
Nelson v Clapham & Anor (t/a Claphams Solicitors) (Unfair Dismissal : Contributory fault) [2012] UKEAT 0037_11_2401 (24 January 2012)
O’ Cathail v Transport For London (Practice and Procedure : Case Management) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0247_11_1301 (13 January 2012)
Odukwe v The Partners of Hoare Lea Consulting Engineers (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2012] UKEAT 0547_10_2701 (27 January 2012)
Roberts v North West Ambulance Service (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [2011] UKEAT 0085_11_2401 (24 January 2012)
Scottish Ambulance Service v Truslove & Anor (Working Time Regulations) [2012] UKEAT 0028_11_1201 (12 January 2012)
Simpson v Strathclyde Police & Anor (Practice and Procedure : Imposition of Deposit) [2012] UKEAT 0030_11_1001 (10 January 2012)
Vetco Gray UK Ltd v Garden (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2012] UKEAT 0025_11_1101 (11 January 2012)
February

Chelmsford College Corporation v Teal (Jurisdictional Points : Continuity of employment) [2011] UKEAT 0277_11_0701 (7 February 2012)

November 2010

Tamina v NHS Professionals (Practice and Procedure : Time for appealing) [2010] UKEAT 0364_10_1811 (18 November 2010)
January

Bullock v. Norfolk County Council [2011] UKEAT 0230_10_2401 (24 January 2011)
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Hamilton & Ors [2011] UKEAT 0413-5_09_2801 (28 January 2011)
Castellotti v Dagul & Moliterno (t/a Cheeky Monkeys Nursery School) [2011] UKEAT 0282_10_2801 (28 January 2011)
Chivas Brothers Ltd v Millar (Contract of Employment : Notice and pay in lieu) [2011] UKEAT 0032_10_2601 (26 January 2011)
Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank BA v Docker [2011] UKEAT 0088_10_1901 (19 January 2011)
Cox v. Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust [2011] UKEAT 0341_10_2001 (20 January 2011)
Davies v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] UKEAT 0416_10_1301 (13 January 2011)
Hosso v European Credit Management Ltd (Revised) [2011] UKEAT 0475_09_0701 (7 January 2011)
Lisboa v Realpubs Ltd & Ors (Sexual Orientation Discrimination or Transexualism) [2011] UKEAT 0224_10_1101 (11 January 2011)
Morgan v. Network Europe Group Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0159_10_1401 (14 January 2011)
Morgan v. The Welsh Rugby Union [2011] UKEAT 0314_10_0701 (7 January 2011)
Pickard v. Lynn Hughes (t/a The Tanning & Beauty Kabin) [2011] UKEAT 0185_10_2801 (28 January 2011)
Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd (Working Time Regulations : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0085_10_1605 (14 January 2011)
Shaw V B&W Group Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0110_10_2511 (25 January 2011)
Shaw v B&W Group Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0110_10_2501 (25 January 2011)
Solus (London) Ltd v Matthews [2011] UKEAT 0395_10_2001 (20 January 2011)
St Aubyn v. Willis [2011] UKEAT 0543_09_1001 (10 January 2011)
Victoria & Albert Museum v Durrant [2011] UKEAT 0381_09_0501 (5 January 2011)
West Dunbartonshire Council v Smith & Ors (Practice and Procedure : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0029_10_1301 (13 January 2011)
February

Ahmed v Metroline Travel Ltd (Disability Discrimination : Disability) [2011] UKEAT 0400_10_0802 (08 February 2011)
amazon.co.uk.ltd v Hurdus (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0377_10_1002 (10 February 2011)
Asda Stores Ltd v Coughlan [2011] UKEAT 0453_10_1102 (11 February 2011)
Bailey v. Alexander House Agencies Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0181_10_1602 (16 February 2011)
Burgess v Bear Stearns International Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Polkey deduction) (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0216_10_1002 (10 February 2011)
Carr Gomm Scotland Ltd v Sneddon (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0031_10_0302 (03 February 2011)
Chassis & Cab Specialists Ltd v Lee [2010] UKEAT 268_10_0707 (07 February 2011)
Crouch v Ant Marketing & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Appearance or Response) [2011] UKEAT 0031_11_2402 (24 February 2011)
D’ Silva v Manchester Metropolitan University (Rev 1) (Contract of Employment : Disciplinary and grievance procedure) [2011] UKEAT 0336_09_1102 (11 February 2011)
First Scottish Searching Services Ltd v McDine & Anor (Redundancy : Fairness) [2011] UKEAT 0051_10_1702 (17 February 2011)
Graff Diamonds Ltd v. Boatwright [2011] UKEAT 0148_10_0402 (4 February 2011)
Greenwood v NWF Retail Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) [2011] UKEAT 0409_09_0218 (18 February 2011)
Honda of the UK Manufacturing Ltd v Gobby [2011] UKEAT 0264_10_0302 (3 February 2011)
Kerr v. Ernst & Young Services Ltd & Ors [2011] UKEAT 0567_10_1402 (14 February 2011)
Lancaster v TBWA Manchester (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0460_10_1702 (17 February 2011)
Liberty Living Plc v Reid (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0039_10_0202 (02 February 2011)
Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz [2011] UKEAT 0578_10_0702 (7 February 2011)
N Aslam v. Barclays Capital Services & Others [2011] UKEAT 0405_10_0302 (3 February 2011)
Newcastle City Council v Spires [2011] UKEAT 0334_10_2202 (22 February 2011)
Noor v Foreign & Commonwealth Office (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [2011] UKEAT 0470_10_1402 (14 February 2011)
Norman & Anor v NWF Retail Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0409_09_1802 (18 February 2011)
OTG Ltd v. Barke & Ors [2011] UKEAT 0320_09_1602 (16 February 2011)
Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v. Power & Ors [2011] UKEAT 0019_11_2402 (24 February 2011)
Roadchef Motorways Ltd v GMB & Anor [2011] UKEAT 0290_10_0102 (1 February 2011)
Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine & Anor [2011] UKEAT 0339_10_0102 (1 February 2011)
Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd v. English [2011] UKEAT 0316_10_2102 (21 February 2011)
Vivian v Bournemouth Borough Council (Unfair Dismissal : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0254_10_0402 (04 February 2011)
Walsall MBC & Anor v Birch & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Amendment) [2011] UKEAT 0376_10_1702 (17 February 2011)
Watson v University Of Strathclyde (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0021_10_0102 (01 February 2011)
World of Home Improvements Ltd v. J Cooper-Frewer (Debarred) [2011] UKEAT 0248_10_2402 (24 February 2011)
March

Allen (Nee Aboyade-Cole) v Hounga & Anor [2011] UKEAT 0326_10_3103 (31 March 2011)
The Audit Commission v Haq & Ors [2011] UKEAT 0123_10_1803 (18 March 2011)
Bournemouth Borough Council v Leadbeater [2011] UKEAT 0010_11_1103 (11 March 2011)
Burke v The College of Law & Anor [2011] UKEAT 0301_10_0803 (8 March 2011)
Burns v Santander UK Plc (Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2011] UKEAT 0500_10_2303 (23 March 2011)
Carruthers v London School of Economics Students Union [2011] UKEAT 0183_10_0803 (8 March 2011)
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Grewal (Race Discrimination : Burden of proof) [2011] UKEAT 0406_09_1804 (16 March 2011)
DGF Ltd v O’’Neil [2011] UKEAT 0197_10_1003 (10 March 2011)
DLA Piper UK Management Services Ltd v. Codyre [2011] UKEAT 0323_10_1103 (11 March 2011)
Ezsias v. North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2011] UKEAT 0399_09_1803 (18 March 2011)
Foster v. Bon Groundwork Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0382_10_1703 (17 March 2011)
Grewal v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Race Discrimination : Burden of proof) [2011] UKEAT 0320_10_1804 (16 March 2011)
Hancocks v Cambian Education Services Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Time for appealing) [2011] UKEAT 0824_10_1103 (11 March 2011)
HCA International Ltd v May- Bheemul (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0477_10_2303 (23 March 2011)
Holt v EB Security Services [2011] UKEAT 0603_10_0203 (2 March 2011)
Hussain v Vision Security Ltd & Anor (Age Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0439_10_1003 (10 March 2011)
Insaidoo v Metropolitan Resources North West Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Chairman alone) [2011] UKEAT 0365_10_2303 (23 March 2011)
Iteshi v. London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [2011] UKEAT 0491_10_1703 (17 March 2011)
John Lewis Partnership v Charman (Jurisdictional Points : Extension of time: reasonably practicable) [2011] UKEAT 0079_11_2403 (24 March 2011)
Knight v. BCCP Ltd [2011] UKEAT 0413_10_1603 (16 March 2011)
Kurumuth v. NHS Trust North Middlesex University Hospital [2011] UKEAT 0524_10_2203 (22 March 2011)
Lambert v Vicomte Bernard De Romanet Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Procedural fairness or automatically unfair dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0501_10_1803 (18 March 2011)
Leira v. Ministry of Justice (Time for appealing) [2011] UKEAT 1245_10_2103 (21 March 2011)
Mahood v Irish Centre Housing Ltd (Race Discrimination : Vicarious liability) [2011] UKEAT 0228_10_2203 (22 March 2011)
Marks and Spencer Plc v. Powell [2011] UKEAT 0258_10_0103 (1 March 2011)
McWilliam & Ors v Glasgow City Council (Sex Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0036_10_1003 (09 March 2011)
Moore v The President Of The Methodist Conference (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2011] UKEAT 0219_10_1503 (15 March 2011)
Mott MacDonald Ltd v Rivkin (Age Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0488_10_0803 (08 March 2011)
Parker v. Northumbrian Water [2011] UKEAT 0221_10_3003 (30 March 2011)
Parmer v East Leicester Medical Practice (Victimisation Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0490_10_0103 (01 March 2011)
Prest & Ors v Mouchel Business Services Ltd & Anor (Equal Pay Act : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0604_10_0203 (02 March 2011)
Queensway Surgery v Jayatilaka (Practice and Procedure : Amendment) [2011] UKEAT 0046_11_3003 (30 March 2011)
Remploy Ltd v Brain [2011] UKEAT 0465_10_0203 (2 March 2011)
Sakharkar v Northern Foods Grocery Group Ltd (t/a Fox’s Biscuits) [2011] UKEAT 0442_10_0803 (8 March 2011)
Sanders v Kingston Transport Ltd (t/a Sussex Skips) (Unfair Dismissal : Polkey deduction) [2011] UKEAT 0469_10_2803 (28 March 2011)
Singh- Rathour & Anor v Taylor & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Time for appealing) [2011] UKEAT 0879_10_1103 (11 March 2011)
South Ayrshire Council v Aitchison & Ors (Equal Pay Act) [2011] UKEAT 0050_10_1103 (11 March 2011)
Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust v. Crawford & Anor [2011] UKEAT 0338_10_0303 (3 March 2011)
T Mobile (UK) Ltd v Singleton (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination) [2011] UKEAT 0410_10_2303 (23 March 2011)
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v Mylott (Rev 1) (Unfair Dismissal: S.98A(2) ERA) [2010] UKEAT 0399_10_1304 (11 March 2011)
April

Baiyelo v London Borough Of Southwark & Ors (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 1189_10_0504 (05 April 2011)
Barreto v Wincanton Group Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) [2011] UKEAT 0659_10_1404 (14 April 2011)
Breakell v West Midlands Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Association Named As Shropshire Army Cadet Force [2011] UKEAT 0372_10_1104 (11 April 2011)
Community Law Clinic Solicitors Ltd & Ors v Methuen (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0024_11_0804 (8 April 2011)
Cromwell Garage Ltd v Doran (Sex Discrimination : Pregnancy and discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0369_10_0804 (08 April 2011)
Cullinane v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services Ltd & Anor (Jurisdictional Points : Extension of time: reasonably practicable) [2011] UKEAT 0537_10_0504 (05 April 2011)
DB Schenker Rail (UK) Ltd v Doolan (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2010] UKEAT 0053_09_1304 (13 April 2011)
Deer v Walford & Anor (Victimisation Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2010] UKEAT 0283_10_2004 (20 April 2011)
Eversheds Legal Services Ltd v. De Belin [2011] UKEAT 0352_10_0604 (6 April 2011)
Francis v Cleveland Police Authority (Practice and Procedure : Perversity) [2011] UKEAT 0335_10_1304 (13 April 2011)
Francois v Castle Rock Properties Ltd (t/s Electric Ballroom) (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0260_10_0504 (05 April 2011)
Gateshead City Council v Hope (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0582_10_1904 (19 April 2011)
I Lab Facilities Ltd v Metcalfe & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Transfer) [2011] UKEAT 0441_10_0604 (06 April 2011)
Independent Insurance Co Ltd v Aspinall & Anor (Redundancy : Collective consultation and information) [2011] UKEAT 0051_11_1204 (12 April 2011)
Johanson (t/a Kaleidascope Child Care) v Yeo (Practice and Procedure : Parties) [2011] UKEAT 0541_10_0704 (7 April 2011)
Lycee Francais Charles De Gaulle v Delambre (Age Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0563_10_0504 (05 April 2011)
Mak v Waygood Gallery Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0589_10_1904 (19 April 2011)
Molaudi v. Ministry of Defence (Jurisdictional Points ) [2011] UKEAT 0463_10_1504 (15 April 2011)
Olayemi v Athena Medial Centre & Ors (Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2011] UKEAT 0613_10_2004 (20 April 2011)
Peninsula Business Services Ltd v. Rees & Ors [2011] UKEAT 0407_10_2104 (21 April 2011)
Price v Revenue & Customs (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0518_10_0704 (07 April 2011)
Pybus v Geoquip Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Contributory fault) [2010] UKEAT 0093_10_1304 (13 April 2011)
Reed In Partnership Ltd v Fraine (Jurisdictional Points : Extension of time: reasonably practicable) [2011] UKEAT 0520_10_0804 (08 April 2011)
Scottish & Southern Energy Plc v Innes (Statutory Discipline and Grievance Procedures : Impact on compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0043_10_1204 (12 April 2011)
Secretary Of State For Justice v Macdonald- Heaney (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0401_10_0104 (7 April 2011)
Small v Bark Havering And Redbridge Nhs Trust (Sex Discrimination : Inferring discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0536_10_1204 (12 April 2011)
St James Management Services Ltd v Power (Unfair Dismissal : s.98A(2) ERA) [2011] UKEAT 0562_10_2604 (26 April 2011)
Stoyle v The Artful Group Ltd (t/a Art Group) (Disability Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0523_10_1104 (11 April 2011)
Vatish v Crown Prosecution Service (Practice and Procedure : Restricted Reporting Order) [2011] UKEAT 0164_11_1804 (18 April 2011)
Wang v University Of Keele (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination) [2010] UKEAT 0223_10_0804 (8 April 2011)
May

Aitken V The Tontine Hotel (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0055_10_1005 (10 May 2011)
Andrew v Eden College & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0438_10_1005 (10 May 2011)
Bailey v R & R Plant (Peterborough) Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0370_10_1805 (18 May 2011)
Beddoes & Ors v Birmingham City Council (Equal Pay Act : Other establishments) (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0037_10_0905 (9 May 2011)
Birmingham City Council v Akhtar & Ors (Equal Pay Act : Other establishments) (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0040_10_0905 (9 May 2011)
Birmingham City Council v Barker (Equal Pay Act : Other establishments) (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0056_10_0905 (9 May 2011)
Birmingham City Council v Beck & Ors (Equal Pay Act : Other establishments) (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0055_10_0905 (9 May 2011)
Bouzir v Country Style Foods Ltd (Race Discrimination : Burden of proof) [2011] UKEAT 0310_10_1805 (18 May 2011)
Burden v Stevenage Borough Council (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0587_10_0605 (06 May 2011)
Chatwal v Wandsworth Borough Council (Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0487_10_0607 (13 May 2011)
Cherfi v G4S Security Services Ltd (Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0379_10_2405 (24 May 2011)
Cherfi v G4S Security Services Ltd (Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0379_11_2405 (24 May 2011)
City Index Ltd v Kurt (Race Discrimination : Direct) [2011] UKEAT 0512_10_2405 (24 May 2011)
Computers In The City Ltd v Martin (Contract of Employment : Wrongful dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0543_10_0405 (04 May 2011)
Dabson v David Cover & Sons Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0374_10_0905 (9 May 2011)
EAGA Plc v Tideswell (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0007_11_1605 (16 May 2011)
First Choice Homes (Oldham) Ltd v Capon & Anor (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0049_11_1905 (19 May 2011)
Frew v Springboig St John’s School (Unfair Dismissal : Polkey deduction) [2011] UKEAT 0052_10_1105 (11 May 2011)
Garside And Laycock Ltd v Booth (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0003_11_2705 (27 May 2011)
Hiero v Changework Now Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Review) [2011] UKEAT 0424_10_1905 (19 May 2011)
Howard v Campbell’s Caravans Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0609_10_1205 (12 May 2011)
Jacovelli v Royal Mail Group Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0055_11_2405 (24 May 2011)
Johnston v Welsh National Opera Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0015_11_2005 (20 May 2011)
Jones v The City And County Of Swansea (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2010] UKEAT 0090_10_0505 (5 May 2011)
Komeng v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (Race Discrimination : Direct) [2011] UKEAT 0592_10_2305 (23 May 2011)
Kudjodji v LIDL Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Preliminary issues) [2011] UKEAT 0054_11_2505 (25 May 2011)
Kuehne & Nagel Drinks Logistics Ltd v Deadkin & Ors (Contract of Employment : Implied Term or Variation or Construction of Term) [2011] UKEAT 0030_11_1705 (17 May 2011)
London Borough Of Hackney v Sivanandan & Ors (Race Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0075_10_2705 (27 May 2011)
Ministry Of Defence v P and Q (Victimisation Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0104_11_2705 (27 May 2011)
Mirikwe v Wilson & Co Solicitors & Ors (Unfair Dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0025_11_1105 (11 May 2011)
Northumberland County Council v Collins & Ors (Equal Pay Act : Work rated equivalent) [2011] UKEAT 0216_09_0505 (05 May 2011)
Price v Transport For London (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0005_11_0605 (06 May 2011)
Publicis Consultants UK Ltd v O’ Farrell (Redundancy : Fairness) [2011] UKEAT 0430_10_2705 (27 May 2011)
Reilly v Tayside Public Transport Company Ltd & Anor (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0065_10_2705 (27 May 2011)
Screene v Seatwave Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0020_11_2605 (26 May 2011)
The Secretary of State for Business Innovations & Skills v Studders & Ors (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2011] UKEAT 0571_10_1705 (17 May 2011)
Skills Development Scotland Co Ltd v Buchanan & Anor (Equal Pay Act : Material factor defence and justification) [2011] UKEAT 0042_10_2505 (25 May 2011)
Vivian v Bournemouth Borough Council (Unfair Dismissal : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0254_10_0605 (06 May 2011)
Weare v HBOS Plc (Practice and Procedure : Review) [2011] UKEAT 0612_10_0505 (05 May 2011)
Williams v Guardian Care Homes Ltd & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) [2011] UKEAT 0551_10_0905 (09 May 2011)
Williamson & Soden Solicitors v Briars (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2011] UKEAT 0611_10_2005 (20 May 2011)
Wilsons Solicitors v Johnson & Ors (Practice and Procedure) [2011] UKEAT 0515_10_2005 (20 May 2011)
Zeff v Lewis Day Transport Plc (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0418_10_1705 (17 May 2011)
June

Addaction v Cheema (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0087_11_2306 (23 June 2011)
Baraheni v Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (Practice and Procedure : Disclosure) [2011] UKEAT 0137_11_1306 (13 June 2011)
Chivas Brothers Ltd v Robertson (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0066_10_2306 (23 June 2011)
Connolly v Whitestone Solicitors (Jurisdictional Points : Fraud and illegality) [2011] UKEAT 0445_10_2406 (24 June 2011)
Fox v Ocean City Recruitment Ltd (Victimisation Discrimination : Protected disclosure) [2011] UKEAT 0035_11_1306 (13 June 2011)
Habashi v The Crown Prosecution Service (Race Discrimination : Inferring discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0554_10_1006 (10 June 2011)
Hine & Anor (t/a Hine Marketing Partnership) v Talbot & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Time for appealing) [2011] UKEAT 1783_10_2706 (27 June 2011)
Jackson v Cambridgeshire County Council & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0402_09_0806 (8 June 2011)
Jobcentre Plus Department Of Work And Pensions (DWP) v Graham (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0610_10_0306 (03 June 2011)
Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v Foster (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [2011] UKEAT 0052_10_1406 (14 June 2011)
Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v Foster (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [2011] UKEAT 0552_10_1406 (14 June 2011)
Lockey v East North East Homes Leeds (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0511_10_1406 (14 June 2011)
London Borough Of Waltham Forest v Martin (Race Discrimination : Discrimination by other bodies) [2011] UKEAT 0069_11_2306 (23 June 2011)
Macquet v Naiade Resorts (UK) Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0495_10_1606 (16 June 2011)
Martin v The Co-Operative Group Ltd (t/a The Co-Operative Pharmacy) (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0061_10_1606 (16 June 2011)
McBride v Falkirk Football & Athletic Club (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0058_10_1706 (17 June 2011)
NHS Leeds v Larner (paid annual leave – submitting request) [2011] UKEAT 0088_11_2907 (29 June 2011)
NHS Leeds v Larner (Working Time Regulations : Holiday pay) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0088_11_2906 (29 June 2011)
Oudahar v Esporta Group Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Automatically unfair reasons) [2011] UKEAT 0566_10_2206 (22 June 2011)
Phillips v Xteria Communications Ltd (Redundancy : Collective consultation and information) [2011] UKEAT 0244_10_1706 (17 June 2011)
Pressure Coolers Ltd v Molloy & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Insolvency) [2011] UKEAT 0272_10_0906 (9 June 2011)
Purohit v Hospira UK Ltd & Anor (Practice and Procedure : Case Management) [2011] UKEAT 0229_11_2906 (29 June 2011)
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Kelly (Practice and Procedure : Delay in ET judgment) [2011] UKEAT 0001_11_2106 (21 June 2011)
Sheffield City Council v Norouzi (Harassment : Conduct) [2011] UKEAT 0497_10_1406 (14 June 2011)
Sivagnansundarum v Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) [2010] UKEAT 0388_09_2806 (28 June 2011)
Strathclyde Joint Police Board v Cusick (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0060_10_1506 (15 June 2011)
Symonds (t/a Symonds Solicitors) v Redmond -Ord (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0028_11_1006 (10 June 2011)
Tasneem v Dudley Group Of Hospitals NHS Trust (Contract of Employment : no sub-topic) [2010] UKEAT 0232_10_2906 (29 June 2011)
Taylor v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 1807_10_1506 (15 June 2011)
Thornton v Jones (Practice and Procedure : Appearance or Response) [2011] UKEAT 0068_11_2106 (21 June 2011)
Ventrac Sheet Metals Ltd v Fairly (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0064_10_1406 (14 June 2011)
VMI (Blackburn) Ltd v Camm (Practice and Procedure : Right to be heard) [2011] UKEAT 0011_11_0206 (02 June 2011)
Walker v Church Mission Society (Jurisdictional Points : Working outside the jurisdiction) [2011] UKEAT 0036_11_1706 (17 June 2011)
Wilcox v Birmingham CAB Services Ltd (Disability Discrimination : Direct disability discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0293_10_2306 (23 June 2011)
Winchester And Eastleigh Healthcare NHS Trust v Walker (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0048_11_2406 (24 June 2011)
July

Ahsan v The Labour Party (Race Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0211_10_2907 (29 July 2011)
Bird v Stoke -On -Trent Primary Care Trust (Redundancy : Suitable alternative employment) [2011] UKEAT 0074_11_2107 (21 July 2011)
Buzzacott LLP v Ellis (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0361_10_2907 (29 July 2011)
Compass Group Plc v Ayodele (Unfair Dismissal : Retirement) [2011] UKEAT 0484_10_1407 (14 July 2011)
Computers In The City Ltd v Amamize (Unfair Dismissal : Polkey deduction) [2011] UKEAT 0187_11_1807 (18 July 2011)
Fariba v Pfizer Ltd & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0605_10_1407 (14 July 2011)
The Federal Republic Of Nigeria v Ogbonna (Jurisdictional Points : State immunity) [2011] UKEAT 0585_10_1207 (12 July 2011)
Fereday v South Staffordshire NHS Primary Care Trust (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0513_10_2207 (22 July 2011)
Gosnold v BA Security Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0110_11_2707 (27 July 2011)
The Governing Body Of Wishmorecross School v Balado (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination) [2011] UKEAT 0199_11_1207 (12 July 2011)
Hamilton & Ors v NHS Grampian (Unlawful Deduction from Wages : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0067_10_2007 (20 July 2011)
Hellewell & Anor v AXA Services Ltd & Anor (Unlawful Deduction from Wages : no sub-topic) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0084_11_2507 (25 July 2011))
The Hira Company Ltd v Daly (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2010] UKEAT 0135_10_2607 (26 July 2011)
London Clubs Management Ltd v Rooney (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0019_11_2207 (22 July 2011)
McMichael v East Sussex County Council (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0091_11_2107 (21 July 2011)
Nageh v David Game College Ltd & Anor (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination) [2011] UKEAT 0112_11_2207 (22 July 2011)
Nottinghamshire Healthcare Nhs Trust v Hamshaw & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Service Provision Change) [2011] UKEAT 0037_11_1907 (19 July 2011)
Perry v Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0473_10_2207 (22 July 2011)
Quashie v Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd (Unfair Dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 1861_10_0507 (05 July 2011)
Renfrewshire Women’s Aid v Lewis (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0008_11_1407 (14 July 2011)
Richardson v HSBC Bank Plc (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0499_10_1307 (13 July 2011)
The Secretary Of State For Business Innovation & Skills v Coward & Anor (Rights on Insolvency) [2011] UKEAT 0034_11_2107 (21 July 2011)
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council & Anor v Hincks & Ors (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0092_10_1407 (14 July 2011)
Shields Automotive Ltd v Greig (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0024_10_1507 (15 July 2011)
Smith v London Metropolitan University (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0364_10_2107 (21 July 2011)
Sood v Christ The King School & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0449_10_2007 ( 20 July 2011)
South Tyneside Council v Ward (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0358_10_1207 (12 July 2011)
St John Ambulance v Mulvie (Victimisation Discrimination : Protected disclosure) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0129_11_0107 (1 July 2011)
Stack v Ajar -Tec Litd (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2011] UKEAT 0527_10_0807 (8 July 2011)
Westlb AG London Branch v Pan (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0308_11_1907 (19 July 2011)
Williams v Miller & Anor (t/a Kitchens, Kitchen Dreams And Rock Solid Kitchens) (Contract of Employment) [2011] UKEAT 0546_10_1507 (15 July 2011)
Wincanton Plc v Atkinson & Anor (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0040_11_1907 (19 July 2011)
Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd (National Minimum Wage : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0102_11_1407 (14 July 2011)
Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Dismissal or ambiguous resignation) [2011] UKEAT 0593_10_2607 (26 July 2011)
August

Abusabib & Anor v Taddese (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) [2011] UKEAT 1819_10_0208 (02 August 2011)
Advance Security UK Ltd v Sheeba (Statutory Discipline and Grievance Procedures : Whether infringed) [2011] UKEAT 0057_11_0408 (04 August 2011)
Afolayan v MRCS LTD (Unfair Dismissal : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0406_10_2308 (23 August 2011)
Albert v Vidionics Security Systems Ltd (Contract of Employment : Disciplinary and grievance procedure) [2011] UKEAT 0138_11_1708 (17 August 2011)
Baxter v. Titan Aviation Ltd (National Minimum Wage) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0355_10_3008 (30 August 2011)
Bishun v Heartfordshire Probation Service (National Probation Service) (Disability Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0123_11_2408 (24 August 2011)
Charles Scott And Partners Consulting Engineers Ltd v Hamilton (Redundancy : Fairness) [2011] UKEAT 0072_10_0908 (09 August 2011)
Chorley Borough Council v Andrews (Unfair Dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0172_11_3108 (31 August 2011)
Clarke v Hasmonean High School (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0548_10_2608 (26 August 2011)
Dunster v First Transpennine Express Ltd (Victimisation Discrimination : Whistleblowing) [2011] UKEAT 0570_10_1908 (19 August 2011)
Freeman v Ultra Green Group Ltd (Victimisation Discrimination : Protected disclosure) [2011] UKEAT 0239_11_0908 (09 August 2011)
Godfrey Morgan Solicitors Ltd v Cobalt Systems Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0608_10_3108 (31 August 2011)
Igboji v Tesco Stores Ltd & Anor [2011] UKEAT 1799_10_2408 (24 August 2011)
Iteshi v British Telecommunications (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0378_11_3008 (30 August 2011)
Iteshi v London Borough Of Harrow & Ors (Race Discrimination : Direct) [2010] UKEAT 0240_10_0308 (3 August 2011)
Kantoh v Kent & Medway NHS & Social Care Partnership Trust (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0526_10_0308 (03 August 2011)
M -Choice UK Ltd v Aalders (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination) [2011] UKEAT 0227_11_1008 (10 August 2011)
Malik v Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust & Others (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0117_11_0908 (09 August 2011)
McKinson v Hackney Community College & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Case Management) [2011] UKEAT 0237_11_0808 (08 August 2011)
Oliver v The Ultimate Solution Partnership Ltd (Disability Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0142_11_1608 (16 August 2011)
Ram v JD Wetherspoon Plc (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0080_11_2508 (25 August 2011)
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust v Watkinson (Victimisation Discrimination : Whistleblowing) [2011] UKEAT 0378_10_1708 (17 August 2011)
Salford NHS Primary Care Trust v Smith (Disability Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0507_10_2608 (26 August 2011)
Samels v The University For The Creative Arts (Redundancy : Suitable alternative employment) [2011] UKEAT 0573_10_3008 (30 August 2011)
Shea v Micros Fidelio (Victimisation Discrimination : Whistleblowing) [2011] UKEAT 0159_11_0208 (02 August 2011)
September

Bungay & Anor v Saini & Ors (Race Discrimination : Vicarious liability) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0331_10_2709 (27 September 2011)
Debique v Ministry Of Defence (Sex Discrimination : Other losses) [2011] UKEAT 0075_11_1509 (15 September 2011)
Dillon & Ors v Todd & Anor (Transfer of Undertakings : Consultation and other information) [2011] UKEAT 0010_11_2109 (21 September 2011)
Dominic Faversham Group v McIntyre (Practice and Procedure : Postponement or stay) [2011] UKEAT 0290_11_0609 (06 September 2011)
Dunn v The Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management [2011] UKEAT 0531_10_2109 (21 September 2011)
Enterprise Managed Services Ltd v Dance & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Dismissal or automatically unfair dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0200_11_2109 (21 September 2011)
F v G (Practice and Procedure : Restricted Reporting Order) [2011] UKEAT 0042_11_2109 (21 September 2011)
Flintshire County Council & Ors v Moore (Deceased) & Anor (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0379_11_1509 (15 September 2011)
Gay v Sophos Plc (Age Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0452_10_1609 (16 September 2011)
General Mills (Berwick) Ltd v Glowacki (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0139_11_2209 (22 September 2011)
The Governing Body Of Beechview School & Anor v Griffin (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0162_11_2909 (29 September 2011)
Griffin v The Governing Body Of Beechview School & Anor (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0163_11_2909 (29 September 2011)
Halliday v Laurent Perrier (UK) Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0568_10_0709 (07 September 2011)
The Hospital Medical Group Ltd v Westwood (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2011] UKEAT 0232_11_2309 (23 September 2011)
Hughes v Transport For London (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0291_11_1909 (19 September 2011)
Iteshi v Office of Water Services (Ofwat) (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0178_11_2209 (22 September 2011)
John Guest Engineering Ltd v Vaio (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0492_10_2109 (21 September 2011)
Jones v Corbin (t/a BOO) (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0504_10_0709 (07 September 2011)
Kaltz Ltd v Hamer (Victimisation Discrimination : Whistleblowing) [2011] UKEAT 1853_10_1509 (15 September 2011)
Kay v Cheadle Royal Healthcare Ltd (t/a Affinity Healthcare) (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0060_11_1209 (12 September 2011)
Korashi v Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board (Victimisation Discrimination : Whistleblowing) [2011] UKEAT 0424_09_1208 (12 September 2011)
London Central Bus Company Ltd v Nana -Addai (Unfair Dismissal : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0204_11_2909 (29 September 2011)
Longstreth v Croydon College (Fixed Term Regulations) [2011] UKEAT 0245_11_1409 (14 September 2011)
Okuoimose v City Facilities Management (UK) Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : Fraud and illegality) [2011] UKEAT 0192_11_1309 (13 September 2011)
Paymentshield Group Holdings Ltd v Halstead (Practice and Procedure : Postponement or stay) [2011] UKEAT 0470_11_0909 (09 September 2011)
Petrofac Offshore Management Ltd v Wilson (Contract of Employment : Wrongful dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 013_11_2009 (20 September 2011)
Readman v Devon Primary Care Trust (Practice and Procedure : Amendment) [2011] UKEAT 0116_11_0109 (01 September 2011)
Rodger (Builders) Ltd v MacDonald (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0020_11_2309 (23 September 2011)
Slade & Others v TNT (UK) Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0113_11_1309 (13 September 2011)
Smith & Ors v Trustees Of Brooklands College (Transfer of Undertakings : Varying terms of employment) [2011] UKEAT 0128_11_0509 (05 September 2011)
Willets v The Jennifer Trust For Spinal Muscular Atrophy (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination) [2011] UKEAT 0282_11_2809 (28 September 2011)
Yellow Pages Sales Ltd v Davie (Practice and Procedure : Application or Claim) [2011] UKEAT 0017_11_2209 (22 September 2011)
October

Asif v Elmbridge Borough Council (Redundancy : Fairness) [2011] UKEAT 0395_11_1910 (19 October 2011)
Bahous v Pizza Express Restaurant Ltd (Race Discrimination : Continuing act) [2011] UKEAT 0029_11_1910 (19 October 2011)
BALfour beatty engineering serviCES v Allen (Jurisdictional Points : Extension of time: reasonably practicable) [2011] UKEAT 0236_11_2410 (24 October 2011)
Bouheniche v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0559_11_1210 (12 October 2011)
Butler v Mellons Ltd & Anor (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0216_11_2110 (21 October 2011)
Camelot Group Plc v Hogg (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0019_10_1310 (13 October 2011)
Chief Constable Of Hampshire Constabulary v Haque (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) [2011] UKEAT 0483_10_1210 (12 October 2011)
Chief Constable Of West Midlands Police v Gardner (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [2011] UKEAT 0174_11_1910 (19 October 2011)
Cordell v Foreign And Commonwealth Office (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [[2011] UKEAT 0016_11_0510 (5 October 2011)
Cunningham & Ors v Clydebank Engineering & Fabrication Ltd (Transfer of Undertakings : Transfer) [2011] UKEAT 0021_11_1810 (18 October 2011)
Czikai v Freemantle Media Ltd & Ors (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2011] UKEAT 0606_10_1210 (12 October 2011)
Dundee City Council v Sharp (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0009_11_1110 (11 October 2011)
Eaton v Spencer & Ors (t/a Wiggles Experience (A Firm)) (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0177_11_0710 (07 October 2011)
Finlay v Cyron & Others (Practice and Procedure : Service) [2011] UKEAT 0121_11_1410 (14 October 2011)
Hinton v Argos Ltd (Victimisation Discrimination : Whistleblowing) [2011] UKEAT 0569_11_0710 (7 October 2011)
Inchcape Retail Ltd v Whiting (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0089_11_2610 (26 October 2011)
Joao v Jurys Hotel Management UK Ltd (Victimisation Discrimination : Health and safety) [2011] UKEAT 11_0210_1110 (11 October 2011)
King v Royal Bank Of Canada Europe Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Reinstatement or re-engagement) [2011] UKEAT 0333_10_1810 (18 October 2011)
Lewis v New College Oxford (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0533_10_1410 (14 October 2011)
Little v Richmond Pharmacology Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination) [2011] UKEAT 0262_11_2110 (21 October 2011)
Minakova v Brownlow Properties Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Admissibility of evidence) [2011] UKEAT 0381_11_1210 (12 October 2011)
Morgan v Halls Of Gloucester (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0573_10_2010 (20 October 2011)
Nolan v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services (Trade Union Membership) [2011] UKEAT 0109_11_1910 (19 October 2011)
Parkinson & Anor v Lancashire Mind Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke) [2011] UKEAT 0758_11_1710 (17 October 2011)
Price v Surrey County Council & Anor (Victimisation Discrimination : Detriment) [2011] UKEAT 0450_10_2710 (27 October 2011)
Radford v Teeside University (Practice and Procedure : Review) [2011] UKEAT 0304_11_2110 (21 October 2011)
Rover v Short (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0496_10_0610 (6 October 2011)
South East Leisure Group Ltd v Vachoumis (Practice and Procedure : Case Management) [2011] UKEAT 0270_10_0410 (04 October 2011)
Stewart v Next Retail Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0011_11_1410 (14 October 2011)
Veterinary Laboratories Agency v Sandvik (Disability Discrimination : Direct) [2011] UKEAT 0263_11_0510 (5 October 2011)
November

Beresford v Sovereign House Estates & Anor (Practice and Procedure : Parties) [2011] UKEAT 0405_11_2911 (29 November 2011)
Bhardwaj v FDA & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0157_11_0411 (04 November 2011)
Bhardwaj v FDA & Ors (Practice and Procedure : Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2011] UKEAT 0158_11_0411 (04 November 2011)
Blitz v Vectone Group Holdings Ltd (Revised 1) (Victimisation Discrimination : Protected disclosure) [2011] UKEAT 0253_10_2911 (29 November 2011)
British Gypsum Ltd v Thompson (Unfair Dismissal : Automatically unfair reasons) [2011] UKEAT 0115_11_2211 (22 November 2011)
Commisioner of Police of the Metropolis v Shaw (Victimisation Discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0125_11_2911 (29 November 2011)
Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis v Weeks (Sex Discrimination : Vicarious liability) [2011] UKEAT 0130_11_2211 (22 November 2011)
Eversheds LLP v Gray (Practice and Procedure : Preliminary issues) [2011] UKEAT 0585_11_2911 (29 November 2011)
Fraser v Southwest London St George’s Mental Health Trust (2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0456_10_0311 (3 November 2011)
Ge Caledonian Ltd v McCandliss (Contract of Employment : Whether established) [2011] UKEAT 0069_10_2211 (22 November 2011)
Griffin v Plymouth Hospitals Nhs Trust (Disability Discrimination : Compensation) [2011] UKEAT 0378_11_1811 (18 November 2011)
Hardie Grant London Ltd v Aspden (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0242_11_0311 (3 November 2011)
Industrial And Municpal Projects Ltd v Boyle (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0014_10_2411 (24 November 2011)
Kaur v The City Of Edinburgh Council & Ors (Race Discrimination : Continuing act) [2011] UKEAT 0015_11_1011 (10 November 2011)
London Borough Of Brent v Finch (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0418_11_2911 (29 November 2011)
McKerrow v The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust (Race Discrimination : Prospective employees) [2011] UKEAT 0387_11_1711 (17 November 2011)
Moxam v Visable Changes & Anor (Harassment) [2011] UKEAT 0267_11_2411 (24 November 2011)
Osonnaya v Queen Mary University Of London (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2011] UKEAT 0225_11_2511 (25 November 2011)
Patel v South Tyneside Council & Ors (Jurisdictional Points : Extension of time: just and equitable) [2011] UKEAT 0917_11_2811 (28 November 2011)
Paw v Revenue & Customs (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns -Barke) [2011] UKEAT 0703_11_2311 (23 November 2011)
Purohit v Hospira UK Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0296_11_0911 (09 November 2011)
Richardson v Pinnacle Entertainment Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Chairman alone) [2011] UKEAT 0218_11_1811 (18 November 2011)
Royal Bank Of Scotland v Donaghay (Unfair Dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0049_10_1111 (11 November 2011)
Ruhaza v Alexander Hancock Recruitment Ltd (Race Discrimination : Direct) [2011] UKEAT 0337_10_0411 (4 November 2011)
Rustamova v Calder High School (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0284_11_0211 (02 November 2011)
Secretary Of State For Justice (Sued As National Offenders Management Service) v Bowling (Equal Pay Act : Material factor defence and justification) [2011] UKEAT 0297_11_2911 (29 November 2011)
SG Baker Ltd v Haggart (Disability Discrimination : Disability related discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0007_11_0911 (09 November 2011)
Transport for London & Anor v Aderemi (Race Discrimination : Direct) [2011] UKEAT 0006_11_0411 (4 November 2011)
Vaidya v The General Medical Council (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0201_11_0411 (04 November 2011)
Vaidya v The General Medical Council (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0202_11_0411 (04 November 2011)
Weedon v Pinnacle Entertainment Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Chairman alone) [2011] UKEAT 0217_11_1811 (18 November 2011)
Whitbread v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Practice and Procedure : Appellate Jurisdiction / Reasons / Burns-Barke) [2011] UKEAT 0231_11_2311 (23 November 2011)
Working Men’s Club And Institute Union Ltd v Balls (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0119_11_0811 (8 November 2011)
December

Ahmed & Ors v Geo W King Ltd & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Service Provision Change) [2011] UKEAT 0022_11_2112 (21 December 2011)
Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou (Victimisation Discrimination : Interim relief) [2011] UKEAT 0293_11_1212 (12 December 2011)
Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou (Victimisation Discrimination : Interim relief) [2011] UKEAT 0293_11_2112 (21 December 2011)
Arriva Trains Wales v Conant (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0043_11_2212 (22 December 2011)
Chamsi -Pasha & Anor v Udin & Anor (National Minimum Wage) [2011] UKEAT 0070_11_0812 (8 December 2011)
Dunn v The Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management (Sex Discrimination : Marital status) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0531_10_0212 (2 December 2011)
Enterprise Management Services Ltd v Connect-Up Ltd & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Service Provision Change) [2011] UKEAT 0462_10_2112 (21 December 2011)
Gillingham Football Club & Anor v McCammon (Practice and Procedure : Postponement or stay) [2011] UKEAT 0625_11_0812 (08 December 2011)
Governing Body of John Loughborough School & Anor v Alexis (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0583_10_0612 (16 December 2011)
Grace v Geo W King Ltd & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Service Provision Change) [2011] UKEAT 0023_11_2112 (21 December 2011)
Harber v Kelly Residential Ltd (t/a Portland Nursing Home) (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0105_11_2212 (22 December 2011)
Heffield City Council v Dolby (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0238_11_0812 (8 December 2011)
Hunter v McCarrick (Transfer of Undertakings : Transfer) [2011] UKEAT 0617_10_1312 (13 December 2011)
John Loughborough School & Anor v Alexis (Unfair Dismissal : Reason for dismissal including substantial other) [2011] UKEAT 0583_10_1612 (16 December 2011)
Jose v Julio (National Minimum Wage ) [2011] UKEAT 0597_10_0812 (08 December 2011)
Julio v Jose (National Minimum Wage) [2011] UKEAT 0553_10_0812 (08 December 2011)
MacKenzie v Billing Aquadrome Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : Constructive dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0095_11_2012 (20 December 2011)
Mustafa v Guy’s And St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out or dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0516_11_2212 (Rev 1) (22 December 2011)
Nambalat v Taher & Anor (National Minimum Wage) [2011] UKEAT 0596_10_0812 (08 December 2011)
Pannu & Ors v Geo W King Ltd & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Service Provision Change) [2011] UKEAT 0021_11_2112 (21 December 2011)
Readman v Devon Promary Care Trust (Redundancy : Suitable alternative employment) [2011] UKEAT 0116_11_0112 (01 December 2011)
Sharma v New College Nottingham (Practice and Procedure : Striking-out/dismissal) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0287_11_0112 (1 December 2011)
Udin v Chamsi -Pasha & Ors (National Minimum Wage) [2011] UKEAT 0071_11_0812 (08 December 2011)
Weatherford UK Ltd v Forbes (Practice and Procedure : Case Management) [2011] UKEAT 0038_11_2012 (20 December 2011)
December 2009

Keane v. Investigo & Ors [2009] UKEAT 0389_09_1112 (11 December 2009)
January

A v B [2010] UKEAT 0206_09_2801 (28 January 2010)
Abiola v North Yorkshire County Council & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0369_08_0701 (7 January 2010)
Agnew & Ors v North Lanarkshire Council (Contract of Employment : Incorporation into Contract) [2010] UKEAT 0029_09_2601 (26 January 2010)
Allen v. The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) [2010] UKEAT 0498_08_1901 (19 January 2010)
Arhin v Enfield Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601 (26 January 2010)
Ashman v Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0252_09_1101 (11 January 2010)
Benjamin-Cole v Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0356_09_0501 (5 January 2010)
Brett & Ors v Hampshire County Council [2010] UKEAT 0500_08_2501 (25 January 2010)
British Airways Plc v Mak & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0055_09_2001 (20 January 2010)
Council of The City of Newcastle Upon Tyne v. Marsden (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0393_09_2301 (23 January 2010)
Curran & Sons Ltd v Beswinski [2010] UKEAT 0476_09_1401 (14 January 2010)
Daley v Serco Home Affairs Ltd & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0086_09_0701 (7 January 2010)
Dean v. Latona Luxury Ltd (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0377_09_2801 (28 January 2010)
Devon & Somerset Fire & Rescue Service v Tilke [2010] UKEAT 0303_09_2501 (25 January 2010)
Grant v. McKechnie Plastic Components [2010] UKEAT 0390_09_1401 (14 January 2010)
J Beattie and Others v. Leicester City Council [2010] UKEAT 0386_09_2001 (20 January 2010)
Jackson Grundy Estate Agents v Hall [2010] UKEAT 0423_09_1501 (15 January 2010)
Khan v. Vignette Europe Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0134_09_1401 (14 January 2010)
London Underground Ltd v Vuoto [2010] UKEAT 0123_09_1801 (18 January 2010)
London Waste Ltd v Scrivens [2010] UKEAT 0317_09_2201 (22 January 2010)
Lyons v Mitie Security Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0081_09_1801 (18 January 2010)
Mehta v. The London Borough of Haringey [2010] UKEAT 0182_08_1901 (19 January 2010)
Miller v Bellway Homes Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0309_09_2601 (26 January 2010)
Munchkins Restaurant Ltd & Anor v. Karmazyn & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0359_09_2801 (28 January 2010)
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children v Dear [2010] UKEAT 0553_08_0701 (7 January 2010)
NCP Services Ltd v. Topliss [2010] UKEAT 0147_09_1501 (15 January 2010)
O’Neill v. Buckinghamshire County Council [2010] UKEAT 0020_09_0501 (5 January 2010)
Patel v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0225_09_1501 (15 January 2010)
Peninsula Business Services Ltd v. Malik [2010] UKEAT 0340_08_2601 (26 January 2010)
Plank v. Atkins Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0799_09_2001 (20 January 2010)
Ramkissoon v. Brompton Bicycles Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0324_09_2201 (22 January 2010)
San Ling Chinese Medicine Centre v Ji [2010] UKEAT 0370_09_2501 (25 January 2010)
Sawar v SKF (UK) Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0355_09_2101 (21 January 2010)
Scargill v National Union of Mineworkers [2010] UKEAT 0407_09_2701 (27 January 2010)
Tasneem v Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0496_09_1801 (18 January 2010)
Thind v. Salvesen Logistics Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0487_09_1301 (13 January 2010)
Tucker v Partnership in Care Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0455_09_1301 (13 January 2010)
Wacha v. Lewis & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0229_09_2601 (26 January 2010)
YKK Europe Ltd v. Heneghan [2010] UKEAT 0271_09_1901 (19 January 2010)
February

Adamson v. Swansea University [2010] UKEAT 0486_09_2302 (23 February 2010)
Agbodo v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] UKEAT 0243_09_1802 (18 February 2010)
Baker v The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis [2010] UKEAT 0201_09_0502 (5 February 2010)
Bateman & Ors v. Asda Stores Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0221_09_1102 (11 February 2010)
Bebbington v. Palmer (t/a Sturry News) [2010] UKEAT 0371_09_2302 (23 February 2010)
Bradford & Bingley Plc v McCarthy [2010] UKEAT 0458_09_0502 (5 February 2010)
Bridgewater Paper Co v Hillyer & Anor (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2010] UKEAT 0376_09_1002 (10 February 2010)
Chief Constable of Wiltshire Constabulary v Masih [2010] UKEAT 0443_09_0202 (2 February 2010)
Commisioner of Police of The Metropolis & Anor v Osinaike [2010] UKEAT 0373_09_2202 (22 February 2010)
Fullerton v. Interights International Centre for The Legal Protection of Human Rights [2010] UKEAT 0251_09_1902 (19 February 2010)
Jones (t/a The Barley Mow Public House) v Beardmore [2010] UKEAT 0392_09_1902 (19 February 2010)
Key Organics Ltd v Billington [2010] UKEAT 0315_09_0802 (8 February 2010)
Macdonald v. Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland [2010] UKEAT 0034_09_1002 (10 February 2010)
May & Baker Ltd (t/a Sanofi-Aventis Pharma) v Okerago [2010] UKEAT 0278_09_1702 (17 February 2010)
Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0069_09_2202 (22 February 2010)
Opara v. Partnerships in Care Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0368_09_1502 (15 February 2010)
Raja v. The Secretary of State for Justice [2010] UKEAT 0364_09_1502 (15 February 2010)
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) v McCarthy [2010] UKEAT 0419_09_0502 (5 February 2010)
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Job Centre Plus) & Ors v Wilson [2010] UKEAT 0289_09_1902 (19 February 2010)
Shanahan Engineering Ltd v. UNITE [2010] UKEAT 0411_09_2202 (22 February 2010)
Stuckey v Daido Industrial Bearings Europe Ltd & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0360_09_1002 (10 February 2010)
Unison & Anor v National Probation Service South Yorkshire & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0339_09_0402 (4 February 2010)
March

Annodata Limited v. Jones [2010] UKEAT 0378_09_0103 (1 March 2010)
BP Plc v. Elstone & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0141_09_3103 (31 March 2010)
Cafagna v. ISS Mediclean Ltd & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0414_09_1803 (18 March 2010)
Carter v The Blackstone Group International Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0966_09_2603 (26 March 2010)
Cleveland Police Authority v Francis [2010] UKEAT 0262_09_1103 (11 March 2010)
Clifton v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc [2010] UKEAT 0347_09_0403 (4 March 2010)
Darnton v Bournemouth University [2010] UKEAT 0391_09_0403 (4 March 2010)
Dogan v. London Borough of Greenwich [2010] UKEAT 0525_09_1503 (15 March 2010)
Goodman & Ors v. Members of The Executive Committee Of Shropshire Unison & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0004_10_1103 (11 March 2010)
Khan v. MKK Logistics [2010] UKEAT 0080_10_3003 (30 March 2010)
Langston v Department for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform [2010] UKEAT 0534_09_0903 (9 March 2010)
M&L Sheet Metals Ltd v Willis [2010] UKEAT 0474_09_1203 (12 March 2010)
Manning & Anor v Middleton Miniature Mouldings [2010] UKEAT 0439_09_0103 (1 March 2010)
Newquest (Herald And Times) Ltd v Keeping (Practice and Procedure : Amendment) [2010] UKEAT 0051_09_1203 (12 March 2010)
Pothecary Witham Weld (a firm) & Anor v. Bullimore & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0158_09_2903 (29 March 2010)
Ridge v Land Registry [2010] UKEAT 0382_09_1903 (19 March 2010)
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v McLelland [2010] UKEAT 0096_10_1103 (11 March 2010)
Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Marshall & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0488_09_3103 (31 March 2010)
Secretary of State for Justice v Mansfield [2010] UKEAT 0539_09_2403 (24 March 2010)
Sheffield Black Drugs Service & Ors v Sheffield Black Drugs Service [2010] UKEAT 0233_09_2903 (29 March 2010)
South London Healthcare NHS Trust v Al-Rubeyi [2010] UKEAT 0269_09_0203 (2 March 2010)
Southern v. Wadacre Ltd (t/a Wadacre Farm Day Nursery) [2010] UKEAT 0380_09_2403 (24 March 2010)
Thorburn v Dherves & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0007_10_2303 (23 March 2010)
Ward Hadaway Solicitors v Love & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0471_09_2503 (25 March 2010)
Ward v Ashkenazi [2010] UKEAT 0416_09_2203 (22 March 2010)
Williamson v.The Chief Constable of The Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0346_09_0903 (9 March 2010)
Wood v Caledon Social Club Ltd (Debarred) & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0528_09_1203 (12 March 2010)
Wood v. Mitchell SA Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0018_10_1203 (12 March 2010)
April

Adegbuji v Meteor Parking Ltd [2010] UKEAT 1570_09_2104 (21 April 2010)
Ahsan v Westmead Business Group Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0480_09_0604 (6 April 2010)
Arkley v Sea Fish Industry Authority [2010] UKEAT 0505_09_1504 (15 April 2010)
Bloxwich Fencing Ltd v Banks [2010] UKEAT 0469_09_2204 (22 April 2010)
Brill v Interactive Business Communications Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0062_09_2004 (20 April 2010)
Brown v. G4 Security (Cheltenham) [2010] UKEAT 0526_09_2704 (27 April 2010)
Chambers & 8 Ors v QCR Motors Ltd & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0545_09_2704 (27 April 2010)
Chancerygate (Business Centre) Ltd v. Jenkins (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0212_10_2204 (22 April 2010)
Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v. Jelic [2010] UKEAT 0491_09_2904 (29 April 2010)
City of Edinburgh Council v Wilkinson & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0002_09_1404 (14 April 2010)
Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis v Rixon [2010] UKEAT 0126_10_0604 (6 April 2010)
Drs Burton, McEvoy and Webb (A Partnership) v. Curry [2010] UKEAT 0174_09_2104 (21 April 2010)
Evans v. The University of Oxford [2010] UKEAT 1510_09_2304 (23 April 2010)
Gayle v. Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0338_09_1604 (16 April 2010)
Goode v. Marks and Spencer Plc [2010] UKEAT 0442_09_1504 (15 April 2010)
Governing Body of Abergwynfi Infants School & Anor v. Jones [2010] UKEAT 0083_10_2004 (20 April 2010)
Heaven v Whitbread Group Plc [2010] UKEAT 0084_10_0804 (8 April 2010)
HM Land Registry v Grant [2010] UKEAT 0232_09_1504 (15 April 2010)
Honey v. City and County of Swansea [2010] UKEAT 0465_09_1604 (16 April 2010)
Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust v. Reilly [2010] UKEAT 0254_09_2704 (27 April 2010)
Lawless v. Print Plus (Debarred) [2010] UKEAT 0333_09_2704 (27 April 2010)
London Borough of Brent v Fuller [2010] UKEAT 0453_09_2104 (21 April 2010)
May v. Greenwich Council [2010] UKEAT 0102_10_1504 (15 April 2010)
Milton Keynes General NHS Trust v Southcote-Want [2010] UKEAT 0270_09_2304 (23 April 2010)
National Amusements (UK) Ltd (t/a Showcase Cinemas) v Thomson [2010] UKEAT 0433_09_2004 (20 April 2010)
NSM Music Ltd v McArdle [2010] UKEAT 0516_09_0704 (7 April 2010)
Oso & Anor v Newham University Hospital NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0099_10_2904 (29 April 2010)
Pinto v. Gloucestershire NHS Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0351_09_1304 (13 April 2010)
Power v. Greater Manchester Police Authority [2010] UKEAT 0087_10_2904 (29 April 2010)
Riley v. Royal Bank of Scotland Plc [2010] UKEAT 0509_09_2304 (23 April 2010)
Scerbaks v Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0029_10_1904 (19 April 2010)
Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills v Howard & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0025_10_0904 (9 April 2010)
Southern Cross Healthcare Co Ltd v Perkins & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0276_09_2104 (21 April 2010)
Thompson v. Reading Borough Council [2010] UKEAT 0175_10_1404 (14 April 2010)
May

Allma Construction Ltd v Bonner (Practice and Procedure : Preliminary issues) [2010] UKEAT 0060_09_1205 (12 May 2010)
Anderson v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Application or Claim) [2010] UKEAT 0056_09_1405 (14 May 2010)
Bashir & Anor v. Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2010] UKEAT 0448_09_2705 (27 May 2010)
Bond v. Urmet Domus Communication & Security UK Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0103_10_2705 (27 May 2010)
Burmis v Aylesford School & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0132_10_1305 (13 May 2010)
Douarin v Abercorn Care Ltd (Unfair Dismissal : S.98A(2) ERA) [2010] UKEAT 0044_09_2605 (26 May 2010)
Enable Care & Home Support Ltd v Pearson [2010] UKEAT 0366_09_2605 (26 May 2010)
Grahams Garden Machinery Ltd v. Warne [2010] UKEAT 0155_10_0705 (7 May 2010)
Hacking & Anor v Wilson (Sex Discrimination : Indirect) [2010] UKEAT 0054_09_2705 (27 May 2010)
Jones v The Collegiate Academy Trust [2010] UKEAT 0011_10_2805 (28 May 2010)
Kotecha v Insurety Plc (t/a Capital Health Care) & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0537_09_0705 (7 May 2010)
Lezo v OCS Group UK Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0104_10_2105 (21 May 2010)
Mbog v. Whitbread Group Plc [2010] UKEAT 0510_09_0505 (5 May 2010)
Mitie Security (London) Ltd v. Ibrahim [2010] UKEAT 0067_10_0605 (6 May 2010)
Moore v. Marks and Spencer Plc [2010] UKEAT 0076_10_1705 (17 May 2010)
Northamptonshire County Council v. Entwhistle [2010] UKEAT 0540_09_2505 (25 May 2010)
Nugent Care v. Boardman [2010] UKEAT 0277_09_2505 (25 May 2010)
O’ Driscoll v. Hertfordshire Personal Assistance Support Service [2010] UKEAT 0412_09_1105 (11 May 2010)
Reddy & Ors v. The Bedfordshire & Luton Partnership NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0023_10_1805 (18 May 2010)
Royal Bank of Scotland v Chaer [2010] UKEAT 0429_09_2005 (20 May 2010)
Scott v Matthew Arnold & Baldwin Solicitors [2010] UKEAT 1712_09_1905 (19 May 2010)
Scotthorne v. Four Seasons Conservatories (UK) Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0178_10_1405 (14 May 2010)
Sibbit v St Cuthbert’s Catholic Primary School [2010] UKEAT 0070_10_2005 (20 May 2010)
Simpson v. Wm A Merrick (Solicitors) (Practice And Procedure : Preliminary Issues) [2010] UKEAT 0490_09_0705 (07 May 2010)
Thomson v. London Borough of Haringey [2010] UKEAT 0318_09_2605 (26 May 2010)
Tower Hamlets Primary Care Trust v.Ugiagbe [2010] UKEAT 0068_09_1305 (13 May 2010)
Woodward v. Santander UK Plc [2010] UKEAT 0250_09_2505 (25 May 2010)
Yorkshire Window Company Ltd v. Parkes [2010] UKEAT 0484_09_2705 (27 May 2010)
June

Aitken v. The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis [2010] UKEAT 0226_09_2106 (21 June 2010)
Asim v University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0094_10_1706 (17 June 2010)
Bedford v. Pilgrims Group Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0106_10_2506 (25 June 2010)
Cancer Research UK v. Harding [2010] UKEAT 0485_09_1606 (16 June 2010)
CK Heating Ltd v. Doro [2010] UKEAT 0043_09_1506 (15 June 2010)
Commisioner Of Police Of The Metropolis v. Nonyelu (Race Discrimination : Comparison) [2010] UKEAT 0010_10_0906 (09 June 2010)
East Dunbartonshire Council v Trade Union Backed Claimants & Anor (Equal Pay Act : Article 141 or European law) [2010] UKEAT 0005_10_2406 (24 June 2010)
Easwaran v St George’s University of London [2010] UKEAT 0167_10_2406 (24 June 2010)
Hill v G & R Pollard Engineering Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0154_10_1506 (15 June 2010)
Hussey v Photogenic Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0069_10_2406 (24 June 2010)
J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] UKEAT 0263_09_1506 (15 June 2010)
Manchester College v Cocliff [2010] UKEAT 0035_10_1006 (10 June 2010)
McCann v. Clydebank College [2010] UKEAT 0061_09_1706 (17 June 2010)
Nazir & Anor v. Asim & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0332_09_2906 (29 June 2010)
Neary v. Service Children’s Education & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0101_10_1706 (17 June 2010)
Nicolson Highlandwear Ltd v Nicolson (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2010] UKEAT 0058_09_2306 (23 June 2010)
Riniker v City & Islington College Corporation [2010] UKEAT 0495_08_2306 (23 June 2010)
Scottish Opera Ltd v. Winning [2010] UKEAT 0047_09_0906 (9 June 2010)
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) v Constable [2010] UKEAT 0156_10_3006 (30 June 2010)
Semple Fraser LLP v Daly (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2010] UKEAT 0045_09_2206 (22 June 2010)
Todd v Strain & Ors (Transfer of Undertakings : Consultation and other information) [2010] UKEAT 0057_09_1606 (16 June 2010)
Todd v. Strain & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0057_10_1606 (16 June 2010)
Wigginton v.Cowie & Ors (t/a Baxter International (A Partnership)) [2010] UKEAT 0322_09_1806 (18 June 2010)
July

Anwar v. Tower Hamlets College [2010] UKEAT 0091_10_2307 (23 July 2010)
Arrowsmith v. Nottingham Trent University [2010] UKEAT 1708_09_1207 (12 July 2010)
Brown v J & J Baxter (t/a Careham Hall) [2010] UKEAT 0354_09_0707 (7 July 2010)
Butt v. Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2010] UKEAT 0210_10_2207 (22 July 2010)
Celebi v Scolarest Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0032_10_2807 (28 July 2010)
Christie v. Johnston Carmichael [2010] UKEAT 0064_09_2707 (27 July 2010)
Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis v Buchanan [2010] UKEAT 0518_09_1307 (13 July 2010)
Dootson v Royal Mail Plc (Practice and Procedure : Time for appealing) [2010] UKEAT 1315_09_0807 (08 July 2010)
Dorbcrest Homes Ltd v Fishwick [2010] UKEAT 0507_09_0607 (6 July 2010)
Edwards v Swindon Borough Council [2010] UKEAT 0095_10_0907 (9 July 2010)
Gloucestershire Constabulary v Peters & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0322_10_1407 (14 July 2010)
Hickling (t/a Imperial Day Nursery) & Ors v. Marshall [2010] UKEAT 0217_10_3007 (30 July 2010)
Johal v. Commission for Equality & Human Rights [2010] UKEAT 0541_09_0207 (2 July 2010)
Kelly v. University of Southampton [2010] UKEAT 0139_10_0607 (6 July 2010)
KLT Construction Ltd v Swain [2010] UKEAT 0527_09_0807 (8 July 2010)
Kraft Foods UK Ltd v Hastie [2010] UKEAT 0024_10_0607 (6 July 2010)
Kulikaoskas v MacDuff Shellfish & Ors (Unfair Dismissal : Automatically unfair reasons) [2010] UKEAT 0062_09_0607 (06 July 2010)
Ministry of Defence v Wallis & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0546_08_3007 (30 July 2010)
Nationwide Building Society v. Benn & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0273_09_2707 (27 July 2010)
Parfums Givenchy Ltd v Finch [2010] UKEAT 0517_09_3007 (30 July 2010)
Punch Pub Company Ltd v O’’Neill [2010] UKEAT 0287_09_2307 (23 July 2010)
Shackletons Garden Centre Ltd v Lowe [2010] UKEAT 0161_10_2707 (27 July 2010)
South Lanarkshire Council v Russell & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0067_09_3007 (30 July 2010)
Tao Herbs & Acupuncture Ltd v Jin [2010] UKEAT 1477_09_1407 (14 July 2010)
Thaine v London School Of Economics (Sex Discrimination – Other losses) [2010] UKEAT 0144_10_0707 (07 July 2010)
Wardle v Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (Known as Calyon UK) [2010] UKEAT 0535_09_1407 (14 July 2010)
Watkins v Crouch (t/a Temple Bird Solicitors) [2010] UKEAT 0145_10_1407 (14 July 2010)
Wedgewood v Minstergate Hull Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0137_10_1307 (13 July 2010)
White v. Burton’s Foods Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0514_09_0607 (6 July 2010)
Willoughby v C F Capital Plc [2010] UKEAT 0503_09_1307 (13 July 2010)
Worrall & Ors v. Wilmott Dixon Partnership Ltd & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0521_09_0907 (9 July 2010)
Yorkshire Housing Ltd v Cuerden [2010] UKEAT 0397_09_1607 (16 July 2010)
Zinda v. Barn Hill Community High & Ors [2010] UKEAT 1146_09_2907 (29 July 2010)
August

Brownbill & Ors v St Helens & Knowsley Hospital NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0074_10_0608 (6 August 2010)
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. A Beck [2010] UKEAT 0141_10_2408 (24 August 2010)
Carclo Technical Plastics Ltd v. Jeyanthikumar [2010] UKEAT 0129_10_0308 (3 August 2010)
Clarke v. Zurich UK General Services Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0184_10_1008 (10 August 2010)
Community Dental Centres Ltd v. Sultan- Darmon [2010] UKEAT 0532_09_1208 (12 August 2010)
Crossland v Corps Of Commissionaires Management Ltd (Working Time Regulations – Holiday pay) [2010] UKEAT 0014_10_1808 (18 August 2010)
Fasuyi v. Compass Contract Services (UK) Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0194_10_2608 (26 August 2010)
JP Morgan Europe Ltd v. Chweidan [2010] UKEAT 0286_09_2608 (26 August 2010)
Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitiors & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0108_10_0608 (6 August 2010)
Owolowo v Family Mosaic Housing Association [2010] UKEAT 0160_10_0908 (9 August 2010)
Perth & Kinross Council v Townsley (Race Discrimination : Indirect) [2010] UKEAT 0010_10_1708 (17 August 2010)
Royal Bank of Scotland Group v Lindsay [2010] UKEAT 0506_09_1908 (19 August 2010)
Serco Home Affairs Ltd v. Watson [2010] UKEAT 0348_10_1008 (10 August 2010)
Simpson v Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0544_09_2708 (27 August 2010)
Smith v Greenwich Council & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0113_10_2408 (24 August 2010)
St Andrews Catholic Primary School & Ors v Blundell [2010] UKEAT 0330_09_0608 (6 August 2010)
West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust v. Evans [2010] UKEAT 0398_09_1908 (19 August 2010)
Wilson Devonald Ltd v Suckling (Unfair Dismissal – Reasonableness of dismissal) [2010] UKEAT 0131_10_0308 (03 August 2010)
WM A Merrick (Formerly t/a WM A Merrick & Co Solicitors) v Simpson [2010] UKEAT 0349_10_2008 (20 August 2010)
September

Badra v Gardiner & Theobald LLP [2010] UKEAT 0191_10_2409 (24 September 2010)
Birch & 99 Others v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0121_10_1009 (10 September 2010)
Bullimore v. Pothecary Witham Weld Solicitors & Anor (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0189_10_2109 (21 September 2010)
Chang-Tave v Haydon School & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0153_10_0209 (2 September 2010)
Community Integrated Care v Peacock (Unfair Dismissal) [2010] UKEAT 0015_10_2209 (22 September 2010)
Dickins (t/a Chris Dickins Solicitors) v. Virdee [2010] UKEAT 0195_10_1609 (16 September 2010)
Dixon v. Viollet & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0342_10_1609 (16 September 2010)
Faleye & Anor v UK Mission Enterprise Ltd & Ors (Practice and Procedure – Transfer or Hearing together) [2010] UKEAT 0359_10_0809 (08 September 2010)
Hussain v Acorn Independent College Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0199_10_0809 (8 September 2010)
Look Ahead Housing & Care Ltd v Rudder [2010] UKEAT 0163_10_0809 (8 September 2010)
Riniker v. City & Islington College Corporation [2010] UKEAT 0541_10_1309 (13 September 2010)
Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v Wakefield [2010] UKEAT 0435_09_1309 (13 September 2010)
TDG Chemical Ltd v Benton [2010] UKEAT 0166_10_1009 (10 September 2010)
October

Berry v. Recruitment Revolution [2010] UKEAT 0190_10_0610 (06 October 2010)
Euro Earth Works Ltd v Robinson [2010] UKEAT 0015_10_2710 (27 October 2010)
Fulcrum Pharma (Europe) Ltd v Bonassera & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0198_10_2210 (22 October 2010)
Hammonds LLP & Ors v Mwitta [2010] UKEAT 0026_10_0110 (1 October 2010)
ISS Mediclean Ltd v. Elkiyari [2010] UKEAT 0205_10_1410 (14 October 2010)
Khetab v AGA Medical Ltd & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0313_10_2110 (21 October 2010)
Kuncharalingam v. Word By Word Translations Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0269_10_2210 (22 October 2010)
Lancaster University v The University & College Union [2010] UKEAT 0278_10_2710 (27 October 2010)
Lucey v. Governing Body of Altrincham Grammar School for Girls [2010] UKEAT 0002_10_1410 (14 October 2010)
National Centre for Young People With Epilepsy v Boateng [2010] UKEAT 0440_10_2710 (27 October 2010)
Nunn v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0530_09_2710 (27 October 2010)
Parveen v. International Dance Shoes Ltd & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0447_10_1310 (13 October 2010)
Pinewood Repro Ltd (t/a County Print) v. Page [2010] UKEAT 0028_10_1310 (13 October 2010)
Power v. Greater Manchester Police Authority [2010] UKEAT 0087_10_0810 (8 October 2010)
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP v. Popa [2010] UKEAT 0030_10_1210 (12 October 2010)
Raithatha v Leicester City Council [2010] UKEAT 0303_10_0710 (7 October 2010)
Scott & Anor v Epsilon Test Services Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0143_10_2810 (28 October 2010)
University of Manchester Faulkner v Faulkner [2010] UKEAT 0081_10_2110 (21 October 2010)
Weston Recovery Services v Fisher [2010] UKEAT 0062_10_0710 (7 October 2010)
Whitelock & Storr & Ors v. Khan [2010] UKEAT 0017_10_2610 (26 October 2010)
November

Argos Ltd v. Reis [2010] UKEAT 0285_10_2911 (29 November 2010)
Arriva London South Ltd v. Nicolaou [2010] UKEAT 0280_10_2211 (22 November 2010)
Balls v. Downham Market High School & College [2010] UKEAT 0343_10_1511 (15 November 2010)
Blitz v Vectone Group Holdings Ltd (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0253_10_1011 (10 November 2010)
Brill v. Interactive Business Communications Ltd (Damages for breach of contract) [2010] UKEAT 0239_10_2511 (25 November 2010)
British Midland Airways Ltd v Hamed (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [2010] UKEAT 0292_10_0311 (03 November 2010)
Cafagna v. ISS Mediclean & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0308_10_1811 (18 November 2010)
Davidson-Hogg v Davis Gregory Solicitors & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0512_09_1511 (15 November 2010)
Dundee City Council v McDermott & Ors (Equal Pay Act : Equal value) [2010] UKEAT 0027_10_0311 (03 November 2010)
Elegbede v Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0298_10_0811 (8 November 2010)
Fecitt & Ors v NHS Manchester [2010] UKEAT 0150_10_2311 (23 November 2010)
Hadfield v The Health and Safety Executive & Anor (Age Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2010] UKEAT 0013_10_0511 (05 November 2010)
Hinsley v West Mercia Constabulary [2010] UKEAT 0200_10_0911 (9 November 2010)
Howe v. London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [2010] UKEAT 0528_10_2611 (26 November 2010)
HSBC Asia Holdings BV & Anor v Gillespie [2010] UKEAT 0417_10_1911 (19 November 2010)
Hughes v The Corps of Commissionaires Management Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0173_10_2211 (22 November 2010)
Johnson v. Rollerworld [2010] UKEAT 0237_10_3011 (30 November 2010)
Jurys Inn Group v. Tatarova [2010] UKEAT 0295_10_2311 (23 November 2010)
KRD Property Maintenance Ltd v O’ Donnell (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2010] UKEAT 0016_10_0211 (02 November 2010)
Locke v Tabfine Ltd (t/a Hands Music Centre) [2010] UKEAT 0517_10_2911 (29 November 2010)
Margarot Forrest Care Management v Kennedy (Practice and Procedure : Amendment) [2010] UKEAT 0023_10_2611 (26 November 2010)
Mehta v Child Support Agency [2010] UKEAT 0127_10_0511 (5 November 2010)
Ministry of Defence & Anor v Carr & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0291_09_1811 (18 November 2010)
Moore v The President Of The Methodist Conference (Jurisdictional Points : Worker, employee or neither) [2010] UKEAT 0219_10_2411 (24 November 2010)
Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v. Marks [2010] UKEAT 0287_10_2311 (23 November 2010)
Page & Anor v. Lakeside Collection Ltd (t/a Lavender Hotels) & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0296_10_1911 (19 November 2010)
Parmar v East Leicester Medical Practice [2010] UKEAT 0022_10_0511 (5 November 2010)
Rayner v. Turning Point & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0397_10_0511 (5 November 2010)
Roberts v. Acumed Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0466_09_2511 (25 November 2010)
South Manchester Abbeyfield Society Ltd v Hopkins & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0079_10_3011 (30 November 2010)
Tamina v. NHS Professionals [2010] UKEAT 0274_10_1811 (18 November 2010)
Tiffin v. Lester Aldridge Llp [2010] UKEAT 0255_10_1611 (16 November 2010)
TJ Courier Chauffeur Express Ltd v Maharjan [2010] UKEAT 0648_10_1511 (15 November 2010)
The University of The Arts London v. Rule [2010] UKEAT 0245_10_0511 (5 November 2010)
University of Warwick v Gray [2010] UKEAT 0508_09_0811 (8 November 2010)
Verma v. Barts and The London NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0172_10_2311 (23 November 2010)
Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0489_09_1211 (12 November 2010)
Zaman & Ors v. Kozee Sleep Products Ltd (t/a Dorlux Beds UK) [2010] UKEAT 0312_10_1911 (19 November 2010)
December

Agard v Westminster Kingsway College [2010] UKEAT 0767_10_1412 (14 December 2010)
Benney v. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs [2011] UKEAT 0911_10_0112 (1 December 2010)
Conteh v. Parking Partners Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0288_10_1712 (17 December 2010)
Copple & Ors v. Littlewoods Plc & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0116_10_2312 (23 December 2010)
Gavin v The Equality and Human Rights Commission & Ors [2010] UKEAT 1385_09_1205 (14 December 2010)
Gavin v. Commission For Racial Equality [2010] UKEAT 0221_10_1012 (10 December 2010)
Insaidoo v. Metropolitan Resources North West Ltd [2010] UKEAT 0365_10_0112 (1 December 2010)
Kier Islington Ltd v. Pelzman [2010] UKEAT 0266_10_1512 (15 December 2010)
Martin v. Devonshires Solicitors [2010] UKEAT 0086_10_0812 (9 December 2010)
Meares v. Medway Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0065_10_0712 (7 December 2010)
Miller v. Lambeth Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0943_10_1712 (17 December 2010)
Mindimaxnox LLP v Gover & Anor (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0225_10_0712 (7 December 2010)
Neafsey v. Small & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0828_10_0912 (9 December 2010)
Okoro & Anor v. Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0318_10_0612 (6 December 2010)
Pervez v Macquarie Bank Ltd (London Branch) & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0246_10_0812 (8 December 2010)
Quadrant Catering Ltd v. Smith [2010] UKEAT 0362_10_1012 (10 December 2010)
Roberts v Carlin [2010] UKEAT 0183_09_1712 (17 December 2010)
The Royal Bank of Scotland v. Ashton [2010] UKEAT 0542_09_1612 (16 December 2010)
Saiger v North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust [2010] UKEAT 0325_10_1412 (14 December 2010)
South Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Authority v Beever & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0533_09_1712 (17 December 2010)
Vision Security Group Ltd (t/a VSG) v. Goodyear [2010] UKEAT 0307_10_1712 (17 December 2010)
Wason & Anor v Holborn Community Assocation [2010] UKEAT 0263_10_0212 (2 December 2010)
Wojnarowicz v MOTO Hospitality Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2010] UKEAT 0315_10_0112 (01 December 2010)
Yerrakalva v. Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council & Anor [2010] UKEAT 0231_10_0812 (8 December 2010)


Book A Public Access Barrister Online

January 6, 2012
Leave a Comment


Books

M, Allen, “Textbook on Criminal Law” (Oxford University Press, 9th Edition, 2007)

R, Card, “Card, Cross & Jones: Criminal Law” (Oxford University Press, 18th Edition, 2008)

A, Simester and G, Sullivan, “Criminal Law Theory and Doctrine” (Hart Publishing, 3rd Edition, 2007)

A, Ashworth, “Principles of Criminal Law” (Oxford University Press, 6th Edition, 2009) page

P, Richardson et al, “Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence & Practice” (Thomson Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)

M, Maguire et al, “The Oxford Handbook of Criminology” (Oxford University Press, 4th Edition, 2007)

Case list

Rice (1803) 3 East 581;

Young (1838) 8 C & P 644

Cuddy (1843) 1 Car & Kir 210

Attorney-General’s Reference (No.6 (1980) [1981] 2 AU ER 1057

Attorney-General’s Reference (No.6 of1980) [1981] 2 All ER 1057,

Jones (1986) 83 Cr App R 375,
R v Barnes [2004] EWCA Crim. 3246

Clarence [1888] 22 QBD 23

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

Colohan [2001] Crim LR 845

Brown [1994] 1 AC 212

Laskey, Laggard and Brown v United Kingdom Case No. 109/1995/ 615/703-705

Barnes [2004] EWCA Crim 3246

Wilson [1996] 3 WLR 125

Dica [2004] EWCA Crim 1103

R v Konzani [2005] EWCA 706

Journal Articles

Law Com. Consultation Paper No. 139, Consent in the Criminal Law (I995) Part XII,

Gunn and Ormerod, “The Legality of Boxing”(l995) 15 LS 181

Ashworth, “Criminal Liability ill a Medical Context; The Treatment of Good Intentions” in Simester and Smith, Harm and Culpability 173

Social Disutility and the Law of Consent”(l994) 14 OJLS 121

Roberts. “The Philosophical Foundations of Consent in the Criminal Law (1997) 17 OILS 389,

Bergelson, “The Right To be Hurt; Testing the Boundaries of Consent” (2007) 75 George Washington LR 165, 167

Raz, ‘Autonomy, Toleration and the Harm Principle’, in R. Gavison (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy (1987).

J, Feinberg, ‘Feinberg. Harm to Self, and J. Feinberg. Harmless Wrongdoing (1988)

J, Gardner and S. Shute, ‘The Wrongness of Rape’, reprinted as ch loft. Gardner, Offences and Defences 2007

Duff. “Answering for Crime” (2007). 141-2

Raz, “The Morality of Freedom (l986) 382.

Ryan, ‘Reckless Transmission of HIV: Knowledge and Culpability’ [2006] Crim LR 981,

Bennett, ‘Should we Criminalize HIV Transmission?’ in C. Erin and S. Ost (eds), The Criminal Justice System and Health Care (2007).

Spencer ‘Retrial for Reckless Infection’ (2004) 154 N 1.1762,

Weait “Dica: Knowledge, Consent and the Transmission of HI V” (2004) 154 NLJ 826.

Statute
S.39 of the Criminal Justice Act of 1988
P, Rock, “Sociological Theories of Crime” in M, Maguire et al, “The Oxford Handbook of Criminoloy” (Oxford University Press, 4th Edition

N, Lacey, “Legal Constructions of Crime” in M, Maguire et al, “The Oxford Handbook of Criminoloy” (Oxford University Press, 4th Edition) page 183 defines crime as:

Durkheim “The Division of Labour in society (New York, Free Press (1964) and defines normlessness as a result of deficiency in social regulation.

A, Giddens, “Emile Durkheim: Selected Writings”, (Cambridge University Press) 1972: 11 cited

T, Hirschi, “The Causes of Delinquency”, (California University Press (1969))

P, Scraton, “law, Order and the Authoritarian State: Readings in Critical Criminology, (Open University Press, 1987)

I, Loader and R, Sparks, “Contemporary Landscapes of Crime, Order, and Control: Governance, Risk and Globalization”, in “The Oxford Handbook of Criminoloy” (Oxford University Press, 4th Edition)

D, Garland, “The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, (Clarendon Press, 2001)a:46,

E, Hobsbawm, “The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991) 1994

C, Hay, “Re-stating Social and Political Change, Buckingham, (Open University Press, 1996)

J, Feinberg, “The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 1984-8) and Hillyard et al, “Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously”, (Pluto Press 2004):

H, Hart, “Law, Liberty and Morality”, (Oxford University Press 1963)

A, Ashworth and M,Blake, “The Presumption of Innocence in English Criminal Law” Criminal Law Review 306 -17 (1996)

V, Tadros and S,Tierney, “The Presumption of Innocence and the Human Rights Act” Modern Law Review, 67(3): 402-43 (2004)

J, Langbein, “The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial”, (Oxford University Press, 2003)

N, Lacey, “Responsibility and Modernity in Criminal Law”, Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3) 249 – 277 [2001]

C, Shaw and H, Mckay, “Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas” (University of Chicago Press, 1942),

B, Lander, “Towards an Understanding of Juvenile Delinquency”, (Columbia University Press 1954)

T, Morris, “The Criminal Are: A Study in Social Ecology”, (Routledge & Kegan Paul 1957)

M, Felson and R, Clarke, “Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical Theory for Crime Prevention, Police Research Series”, (London: Home Office 1998)

A, Bottoms, “Environmental Criminology” in M, Maguire, R, Morgan and R Reiner (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 1st edn (Oxford University Press)

R, Clarke “Situational Crime Prevention” in M, Tonry and D, Farrington (eds, “Building a Safer Society (University of Chicago Press 1995)

R, Clark “Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies”,(2edn Guilderland, Harrow and Heston 1997

M, Smith and D, Cornish, “Theory for practice in Situational Crime Prevention” (Criminal Justice Press 2003),

S, Chainey and J, Radcliffe, “GIS and crime management”, (John Wiley 2005: 28-31)

K, Bowers et al, “Closing off opportunities for crime: an evaluation of alley-gating” European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research 10:283-308, 2004)

H, Kennedy, “Women and British Justice: Eve was framed” (2005, Vintage) page 7
http://www.domesticabuse.co.uk
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hors191.pdf
Dr Gadd “Domestic Abuse Against Men in Scotland” http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/cr/Gadd/dvam.pdf page 15
F, Heidensohn and L, Gelsthorpe, “Gender and Crime” in M, Maguire et al “The Oxford Handbook of Criminology” (Oxford University Press, 2007) page 397
S, Walby, J, Allen “Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study 276, London: Home: Office (2004)
B, Halle “The Sinners and the Sinned Against: Women in the Criminal Justice System” 4th Longford Lecuture, London: Prison Reform Trust, (2005).
M, Rice, (1990) “Challenging Orthodoxies in Feminist Theory: A black feminist critique” in L, Gelsthorpe and A, Morris (eds) Feminist perpectives in Criminology, Buckingham: Open University Press
K, Bottomley and K, Pease Crime and Punishment: Interpreting the Data, Milton Keynes: Open University Press .N, Walker, “Crime and Criminology. A Critical Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.  1987   
EDWARDS, S. (1984), Women on Trial, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
CARLEN, P. (1983), Womens Imprisonment, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
DALY, K. (1989), ‘Rethinking Judicial Paternalism: FA Gender, Work-Family Relations and Sentencing’, Gender and Society, 3(1): (1-36)
M., Pearson, C. & Harwin, H (1999) Making an Impact. London, Jessica Kingsley
Woman’s Aid, “Children Bill 2004 – Women’s Aid Federation Briefing on the Amendment to the Children Act 1989 on Child Contact 18.10.04” http://www.womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence articles.asp?section=00010001002200330001&itemid=1250
P, Harris, “Violent fathers gain access to children”  http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2002/dec/15/childrensservices.uknews
Fawcett Society, “Female victims – experiences of the criminal justice system” http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=947
Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004.
Z, Craven, “Battered Woman Syndrome” http://www.austdvclearinghouse.unsw.edu.au/PDF%20files/battered%20_woman_syndrome.pdfPage 2  
L.E. Walker (1977-78). Battered women and learned helplessness. Victimology: an International Journal , 2(3/4), 525-534.
L.E Walker,, (1984). The battered woman syndrome . New York: Springer Publishing Co.
L.E, Walker, (1992). Battered women syndrome and self-defense. Symposium on Woman and the Law, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy , 6(2), 321-334.
M, Dutton, “Critique of the battered woman model” http://www.aaets.org/article138.htm
Emery (1993) 14 CR App R (S) 394,
M, Allen, “Textbook on Criminal Law” (9th Edition, Oxford University press) page 177
Legislating the Criminal Code: Offences Against the Person and General Principles (Law Com No. 218),
A, Ashworth, “Principles of Criminal Law” (Oxford University Press, 6th Edition) page 251
Ibrams [1982] 74 Cr App R 154
Wasik, M, Wasik, “Cumulative Provocation and Domestic Killing” [1982] Crim LR 29.
Ahluwalia [1993] 96 CR App R 133
Brett, “The Physiology of Provocation” [1970] Crim LR 640
O’Donovan, “Defences for Battered Women Who Kill” (l991) 18 J Law and Soc 219
Nicholson, “Telling Tales: Gender Discrimination Gender Construction and Battered Women Who Kill” (l995) 3 Feminist Leg Stud 185.
Law Com No.290, “Partial Defences to Murder”
McColgan, “In Defence of Battered Women Who Kill” (1993) 130 J Law and Soc 508;
Wells, “Battered Women Syndrome and Defences to Homicide: Where Now?” (l994) 14 LS 266;
Dressler, “Battered Women Who Kill Their Syndrome and Defences to Homicide: Where Now?” (l994) 14 LS 266;
Dressler, “Battered Women Who Kill their sleeping tormentors: Reflections on Maintaining Respect for Human Life while Killing Moral Monsters” in Shute and Simester Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (2002) 259
R, Card, “Card, Cross & Jones: Criminal Law” (Oxford University Press, 18th Edition) page 660
Professor Griew, “The Future of Diminished Responsibility” [1988] Crim LR 75
A, Simester and G, Sullivan, “Criminal Law Theory and Doctrine” (Oxford and Portland Oregon, 2007, Third Edition) page 352
R v Mancini [1942] AC 1
Horder, “Re-Shaping the Subjective Element in the Provocation Defence” (200S) 2S Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 123.
Dressler, “Provocation in Irish Law” (1987) 50 MLR 467 and McAuley, “Anticipating the Past: The Defence of Provocation in Irish Law” (1987) 50 MLR 133

M, Jones, “Textbook on Torts” (Blackstone Press Limited, 2000) Page 495

The Broadcasting Act 1990

T, Weir, “A casebook on Tort” (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004) page 520

Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237

J, Steel, “Tort Law: Text, Case and Materials” (Oxford University Press, 2007) page 761

F, Trindade, “Defamatory Statements and Political Discusssion” (2000) 116 LQR 185

K, Williams, “Defaming Politicians: The not so Common Law” (2003) 63 MLR 748

J, Fleming, “The Law of Torts ( 9th Edition, NSW: Law Book Company, 1998) Page 648

The Defamation Act 1952

Lewis Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234

Hough v London Express [1940] 2 KB 507

L, Bently and B, Sherman, “Intellectual Property law” (Oxford University Press, 2009) page 1002

Slim v Daily Telegraph [1968] 2 QB 157

E, Barendt, “Libel and Freedom of Speech in English Law [1993] PL 449

Lyon v Daily Telegraph [1943] KB 746

Cheng v Tse Wai Chun Paul [2000] 4 HKC 1 at 14

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Limited [2001] 2 AC 127

London Artists v Littler [1969] 2 QB 375

Kemsley v Foot [1952] AC 345

Rupert Lowe v Associated Newspapers [2006] EWHC 320

Telnikoff v Matusevitch [1992] 2 AC 343

Branson v Bower [2002] QB 737.

European Convention on Human Rights.

Richardson & Thomas, “Archbold 2003” (Thomson Sweet & Maxwell) page 1544.
Human Rights Act 1998

Handyside v UK, X Ltd v UK 28 DR 77

Lingens v Austria 8 EHRR 407

Muller v Switzerland 18 EHRR 276

Jersild v Denmark 19 EHRR 1

Otto-Premiger-Institut v Austria 19 EHRR 34

Prager and Obershclick v Austria 21 EHRR

Goodwin v UK 22 EHRR 123

Gleaves v Deakin [1980] AC 477 HL

Defamation Act 1996

Reynold v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127

I, Loveland “Reynolds v Times Newspapers in the House of Lords” [2000] PL 351
Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634.

1. I,Smith, & G, Thomas, “Smith & Wood’s: Employment Law” (Oxford University Press, 2008) page 121

William Hill Organisation Ltd v Tucker [1998] IRLR

Turner v Sawdon & Co . [l90l] 2 KB 653

Herbert Clayton and Jack Waller Ltd v Oliver [l930] AC 209

Langston v AUEW (No.2) [l974] ICR 5l0 at page 52l.

Fechter v Montgomery (l863) 33 Beav. 22,

Marbe v George Edwardes (Daly’s Theatre) Ltd [l928] l KB 269,

Driscoll v Australian RMSN Co . (l859) l F & F 458),

Collier v Sunday Referee Publishing Co. Ltd [l940] 2 KB 647,

Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [l909] AC,

Devonald v Rosser [l906] 2 KB 728

Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [l909] AC 488.

Provident Financial Group v Hayward [l989] ICR l60.

William Hill Organisation Ltd v Tucker [1998] IRLR 313

Credit Suisse v Armstrong [l996] ICR 882,

Devonald v Rosser & Sons [l906] 2 K.B. 728

Turner v Sawdon & Co. [l90l] 2 K.B. 653

Evening Standard Co Ltd v Henderson [1987] ICR 588, [1987] IRLR 64 CA

Euro Brokers Ltd v Rabey [1995] IRLR 206

M, Freedland, “Industrial Conflict Law” (1989) 18 ILJ 112

Gouldring, “Injunctions and contracts of employment: the Evening Standard doctrine (1990) 19 ILJ

Warner Bros, v. Nelson (1937) 1 K.B. 209

Symbian Ltd v Christiensen [2001] IRLR 77 CA

Credit Suisse Asset Management Ltd v Armstrong [1996] ICR 882, [1996] IRLR 450

GFI Group Inc v Eaglestone [1994] IRLR 119

Cantor Fitzgerald International v George [2002] IRLR 867

Clark v Nomura International plc [2000] IRLR 766

Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Jean Tigana [2005] EWCA Civ 895, [2004] EWHC 2585 QB

Crystal Palace FC (2000) Ltd v Stephen Bruce [2001]

Sendo Holdings plc (in administration) v Brogan [2005] EWHC 2040 (QB)

TFS Derivatives Ltd. v Morgan [2004] EWHC 3181

SG & R Valuation Service Co v. Boudrais & others, it was held [2008] EWHC 1340 (QB)

Gogay v. Hertfordshire CC [2000] IRLR 703

Standard Life Healthcare Ltd v. Gorman & others [2009] EWHC 791.

Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688

Allied Dunbar (Frank Weisinger) Ltd v Weisinger [1988] IRLR 60.

American Cyanamid Co v. Ethicon Ltd [2001] 1 WLR

Knight v Knight (1840) 3

Hunter v Moss [1994], Re London Wine Co (Shippers) Ltd (1975) 126 NLJ 977

Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd [1995] 1 AC 74). 1

Palmer v Simmonds (1854) 16 Sim

Boyce v Boyce (1849) 16 Sim 476

Law of Property Act 1925

Sen v Headley [1991] Ch 425

Cain v Moon [1862] 2 QB

Birch v Treasury Solicitor [1951] Ch 298

Re Barlow’s Will Trust [1979]

Paul v Constance [1977] 1 WLR 527

Re Mustapha (1891) 8 TLR 160

Re Craven’s Estate [1937] Ch 423

Strong v Bird (1874) LR 18 Eq 315

Re Ralli’s Trusts [1964] Ch 288

Pennington v Waine [2002] 1 WLR 2075

T.Choithram International SA v Pagarani [2001] 1 WLR 1 PC

Lambes v Eames (1871) 6 Ch App 597.

Re Adams & Kensington Vestry (1884) 27 ChD 394

Comiskey v Bowring –Hanbury [1905] AC

Mental Capacity Act 2005

R, Pearce & J, Stevens, “The Law of Trust and Equitable Obligations”, (4 Edn, Oxford University Press 2006)

Milroy v Lord (1862) 4 De GF & J 26

Re Rose [1952] Ch 499 (CA)

Articles

1. Baker P.V, ‘Land as donatio mortis causa’, [1993] L.Q.R., 19-21

2. Garton, J, ‘The role of the trust mechanism in the rile in Re Rose’, [2003], Conv., 364-379

3. Halliwell, M, ‘Perfecting imperfect gifts and trusts: have we reached the end of the Chancellor’s foot?’, [2003], Conv., 192-202

Books

1. R, Pearce, and J, Stevens, “The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations” (3rd Ed), 2002, (Butterworths LexisNexis, London)

2. D, Hayton, D, and C, Marshall, “The Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies” (12th Ed), 2005, (Thomson Sweet & Maxwell)

3. Oxford, “A Dictionary of Law”, 6th Ed, 2006 (Oxford University Press)

4. Wilkie, M, Malcolm, R, Luxton, Peter, “Questions and Answers Equity and Trusts”, (6th Ed), 2008, (Oxford University Press)

5. R, Pearce and J, Stevens, “The Law of Trusts and Equitable obligations” (Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition, 2006) op cit page 196

6. Hanbury & Martin, “Modern Equity” (17th Edition, 2005)

7. Hayton and Marshall, “Commentary and Case on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies (Sweet & Maxwell Press, 2001)

8. P, Todd, S, Lowe, “Textbook on Trusts” (Fifth edition, Blackstone Press Limited)

Cases

Richards v Delbridge (1874) LR 18 Eq 11 at 14.

Saulnier v Anderson [1987] N.B.J. No. 830

Paul v Constance [I977] l WLR 527, CA.

Jones v Lock (1865) 1 Ch App 25.

Milroy v Lord (1862) 4 De GF & J 264

Pennington v Waine [2001] 1 WLR 275

Strong v Bird [1874] LR 18 Eq 315

Re Freeland [1952] Ch ll0;

Re Wale [1956] WLR 1346;

Choithram v Pagarani [2001J 2 All ER 492

Re James [1935] Ch 449

Re Gonin [1979] CH 16

Fletcher v Fletcher [1844] 4 Hare 67

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

Re Kay’s Settlement [1939] Ch 329

Re Cook’s Settlement Trusts [1965] Ch 902

Mascall v Mascall [1984] 50 P & CR 119 CA

Re Johnson (l905) 92 LT 357, per Farwell J;

Re Craven’s Estate [1937] Ch 423, Per Farwell J;

Delgoffe v Fader [1939] Ch 922, per Luxmore U;

Birch v Treasury Solicitor [1951] Ch 298.

Smallacombe v Elder’s Trustee & Executor Co Ltd [1963] WAR at 4-5

Re Lillingston [1952] 2 All ER 184 at 187,

Wilkes v Allington [1931] 2 Ch 104,

Gardner v Parker (IBIS) 3 Madd IB4;

Staniland v Willott (lB52) 3 Mac & G 664;

Keys v Hore (lB79) 13 ILT 58.

Birch v Treasury Solicitor [1951] Ch 298

Woodard v Woodard [1991] Fam Law 470

J, Fairhurst, “Law of the European Union”, (Longman Publishing 2007)

P, Craig, and G, De Burca, “EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials”, (Oxford University Press, 2008 4th edn)

Commission v Italy (C-51/83) [1984] ECR 2793

Commission v Netherlands (C-350/02) [2004] I-6213

Commission v France (C-1/00) [2001] ECR I-9989

Commission v Spain C-278/01

G, De Burca, “The Institutional Development of the EU: A Constitutional Analysis page 55 in P, Craig and G, De Burca, “The Evolution of EU Law” (Oxford University Press, 2003)

Commission Report SEC(95)731 final

Council report, Brussels 1995

European parliament Resolution, A4-0102/95;

Court of Justice Report, May 1995

Article 300 of the EC Treaty
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html accessed 29 December 2008

M, Van Schendelen, ‘The Council Decides: Does the Council Decide?” (1996) 34 JCMS 531

R, Pedler and G, Schaefer “EC Committees: Influence Counts More than Legal Powers” in (eds), Shaping European Law and Policy: The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process (European Institute of Public Administration, 1996)

S, Bulmer’s article “New Institutionalism. The Single Market and EU Governance” Paper delivered at the 5th Biennal European Community Studies Association Conference, Seattle, 199

S, Bulmer and K, Armstrong, “ The Governance of the Single European Market (Manchester University Press, 1998)

Carvel v Council [1995] ECR II 2765

Netherlands v Council [1996] ECR I -2169

Interporc v Commission [1998] T – 83/96

Van der Wal v Commission [1998] T-174/95

Svenska Journalistforbundet v Council [1998].

M, den Boer “Justice and Home Affairs” in the Treaty on European union: More Complexity Despite Communautairaisation (1997) 4 Masstricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 300

W, van Eekelen, “The Common Foreign and Security Policy” in Reforming the Treaty on European Union 19,323,326

D, Curtin, “Betwixt and Between: Democracy and Transparency in the Governance of the EU” in reforming the Treaty on European Union: The Legal Debate (Kluwer Law International 1996) pages 19 and 21.

F, Hayes-Renshaw and H, Wallace, “The Council of Ministers (Macmillan, 1997

C, Craig and D, De burca, “EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials” (4edn, Oxford University Press, 2008)

T, Christiansen. “Intra-institutional Politics and Inter-Institutional Relations in the EU: Towards Coherent Governance?” (2001) 8 JEPP 747:

EU Constitutional Treaty 2004

D, Chalmers, & A, Tomkins, “European Union Public law”,(2007, Cambridge University Press) Page 2

J, Habermas and J, Derrida, ‘February 15, or, What binds European Together: Pleas for a Common Foreign Policy Beginning in Core Europe’ in D, Levy et al, “Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe: Transatlantic Revelations after the Iraq War (London, Verso, 2005)5, 10-12

D, Levy et al, “Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe: Transatlantic Revelations after the Iraq War (London, Verso, 2005)

M, Malmborg and B, Straith, ‘Introduction: The National Meanings of European in M. Malmbord and B, Straith (eds), The Meaning of Europe (Oxford, Berg 2002) 1,9,20

M. Malmbord and B, Straith (eds), The Meaning of Europe (Oxford, Berg 2002)

Meinander in his article ‘On the Brink or Between? The Conception of Europe in Finnish Identity’ in M, Malmborg and B, Strath (eds) The Meaning of Europe (Oxford, Berg 2002)

Single European Act

J, Weiler, “The Transformation of Europe” (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2403, 2476-7

J,Zielonka, ‘How New Enlarged Borders will Reshape the European Union’ (2001) 39 Journal of Common Market Studies 507, 513-15

The European Communities Act 1972

McCarthys Ltd v Smith [1979] ICR 785

McCarthys Ltd v Smith [1979] Case 129/79

McCarthys Ltd v Smith [1981] QB 180

Garland v BREL [1983] 2 AC 751
Garland v BREL Case 12/81

Duke v GEC reliance [1988] AC 618

Pickstone v Freeman plc [1988] AC 66

Von Colson 14/83

N, Foster, ‘The Effect of the European Communities Act 1972 s.2(4) (1988) 51 MLR 775

Lister v Forth Dry Dock & Engineering Co. Ltd [1990] 1 AC 546

Directive 187/77

CR Smith v Glaziers (Dunfermline) Limited v Commissioners of Customs and Excise

Sixth VAT directive (77/338).

Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] 1 CMLR 50

T, Allen, “The limits of Parliamentary Sovereignty’ (1986) Public Law 614

H, Wade, “Sovereignty and the European Communities” (1972) 88 LQR 1

H, Wade, “What has Happened to the Sovereignty of Parliament?” (1991) 107 LQR 1

P, Craig, “Sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament and Factortame (1991) 9 YEL 221

Minster for Economic Affairs v S.A. Fromagie ‘Le Ski’ [1972] CMLR 330

A, Dashwood, “The Relationship between the Member States and the European Union/European Community (2004) 41 CML Rev 355 – 381

French Consitution

German Constitution (Grundegestz)

Belgian Constitution

Internationale Handelsgesellschaft [1974] 2 CMLR 540

Wunsche Handelsgesellschaft [1987] 3 CMLR 225

Brunner [1994] 1 CMLR 57

N, Foster, The German Constitution and EC Membership” Public Law (Autumn 1994) 392

Federal Tax case 9/1/1996, 7 EuZW 126 (1996)

F, Hoffmeister, “German Bundesverfassungsgericht: Alcan Decision of 17 February, 2000; Constitutional review of EC Regulation on bananas, Decsion of 7 June 2000” (2001) 38 CML Rev 791

Brasserie du Pecheur v Federal Republic of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) (C46/93) the result of breaches of the community rules, resulting in state liability was recognised.

Italian Constitution

Costa v Enel (6/64)

Simmenthal (92/78)

Granital SpA v Adminstrazione delle Finanze (1984) 21 CML Rev 756-72

Fragd SpA v Ammistrazione delle Finanze (1990) 27 CML Rev 93-5

G, Gaja, “New Developments in a Continuing Story; The Relationship between EC Law and Italian Law’ (1990) 27 CML Rev 83

Café Vabre [1975] 2 CMLR 336

Garage Dehus Sarl v Bouche Distribution [1984] 3 CMLR 452.

Minister of the Interior v Cohn-Bendit [1980] 1 CMLR 543

S, Milins, “The Treaty of Amsterdam and the Constitutional Revision in France” (1999) 5 EPL 61

Nicolo [1990] 1 CMLR 173

Boisdet [1991] 1 CMLR 3

Rothmans [1993] CML 253

Dangeville [1993] PL 535

Francovich C-6 case

P, Manin, “The Nicolo Case of the Conseil d’Etat: French Constiutional Law and the Supreme Administrative Court’s Acceptance of the Primacy of Community Law over Subsequent National Statute Law’ (1991) 28 CML Rev 499.

Articles
R, Panikkar, “Is the notion of human rights a western concept?” (1982) 120 Diogenes 75-102
C,Cerna, ‘Universality of human rights and cultural diversity: Implementation of human rights in different socio-cultural contexts’ (1994) 16 Human Rights Quarterly 740
P, Adamantia Pollis, ‘Cultural relativism revisited: Through a state prism’ (1996) 18 Human Rights Quarterly 316-44.
M, Herskovits, ‘Statement on human rights’, (1947) 49 American Anthropologist 539-543.
K, Engle, ‘From scepticism to embrace: Human rights and the American Anthropological Association from 1947-1999’ (2001) 23 Human Rights Quarterly 536-59, at 5
S, Marks. ‘From the “Single Confused Page” to the “Decalogue for Six Billion Persons”: The roots of the Universal Declaration of Human “Decalogue for Six Billion Persons”: The roots of the Universal Declaration of Human
E. Washburn, ‘Cultural relativism, human fights, and the AAA’, (1987) 89 American Anthropologist 939-43, at 939,
V, Schmidt, “The New World Order Inc: The Rise of Business and the Decline of the Nation-State (1995) 124 Daedelus 75 – 76
Alison Renteln, ‘Relativism and the search for I human rights’ (1988) 90 American Anthropologist 56-72.
E. Eriksen, et alThe Chartering of Europe (Arena Report No. 8/2001), rtp:llec.europa.eu/justice_home/doc_centre/rights/charter/docs/network_commentary_final%20_180706.pdf;
K, Feus (ed.), “An EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Text and Commentaries (Federal Trust, 2000); EU “Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights, Commentary on the Charter” (June, 2006) although not forgetting the countries who don’t. · Amnesty International, ‘Human Rights Dissolving at the Borders? Counter-Terrorism and EU Criminal Law’ (Amnesty, May, 2005);
C, Teitgen-Colly, ‘The European Union and Asylum: An Illusion of Protection’ (2006) 43 CMLRev. 1503.
Ansocean Marine Paint v. Commission [1974] ECR 1063
L. Besselink, ‘Entrapped by the Maximum Standard: on Fundamental Rights, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the European Union’ (l998) 35 CMLRev. 629
J. Weiler, ‘Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Boundaries’, in The Constitution of Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1999), ch. 3.
J, Weiler and N, Lockhart, “Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence’ (1995) 32 CMLRev. 51,
Costello, ‘The Bosphorus Ruling of the ECtHR: Fundamental Rights and Blurred Boundaries in Europe’ (2006) 6 HRLR 87
Omega Spielhallen- und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v. Oberbiirgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn [2004] ECR 1-9609
J, Weiler,”’Does the EU Truly Need a Charter of Rights?’ (2000) 6 ELJ95
K,Kuhnert, ‘Bosphorus-Double Standards in European Human Rights Protection?’ (2006) 2 Utrecht Law Review 177,
N. Neuwahl and A. Rosas (eds.), The EU and Human Rights (Kluwer, 1995)
De Witte, ‘The legal Status of the Charter: Vital Question or Non-Issue?’ (2001) 8 MJ 81;
A. Clapham, ‘Where is the EU’s Human Rights Common Foreign Policy?
C. MCCrudden, ‘The Future of The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’,
J. Dutheil de la Rochere, ‘Droits del’homme: : La Charte des droits fondamentaux et au dela’,
G. De Burca, ‘Human Rights: The Charter and Beyond’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 10101, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.orglpapers.
L. Betten ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Trojan Horse or a Mouse?’ [2001] ICLR 151.
H. Toner, ‘Impact Assessment and Fundamental Rights Protection in EU Law’ (2006) 31 ELRev. 316.
J,Liisberg, ‘Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law?’ (200l) 38 CMLRev.1l7l.
J.H.H. Weiler, ‘The European Court at a Crossroads: Community Human Rights and Member State Action’, in F. Capotorti et al. (eds.), Du Droit International au Droit de !’Integration (Nomos, 1987),839-841.
E, Hatch, Culture and Morality: The Relativity of Values in Anthropology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), 37-9,
A,Pollis, ‘Cultural relativism revisited: Through a state prism’ (l996) 18 Human Rights Quarterly 316-44
Chris Brown, “Cultural diversity and international political theory: From the requirement to “mutual respect”?” (2000) 26 Review of International Studies page 200
C, Nowlin, ‘The protection of morals under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’ (2002) 24 Human Rights Quarterly 264-86.
M, Freeman, ‘Human rights and real cultures: Towards a dialogue on ‘’Asian values’” (1998) 16 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 25-39
T, Higgins, ‘Anti-essentialism, relativism and human rights’ (l996) 19 Harvard Women’s Law Journal 89
E, Hatch, ‘The Good Side of Relativism’ (1997) 53 Journal of Anthropological Research 371-81
E, Brems, “The margin of appreciation in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (1996) Zeitschrift fur ausliindisches offentliches Recht und VOlkerrecht page 309
BBC NEWS | UK | Demands for MI5 ‘torture’ inquiry
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7930888.stm
D, Bell and J, Carens, ‘The ethical dilemmas of international human rights and humanitarian NGOs: Reflections on a dialogue between practioners and theorists’ (2004) 26 Human Rights Quarterly 300-29, at 307.
M, Freeman, ‘The problem of secularism in human rights theory’ (2004) 26 Human Rights Quarterly 375-400
The Observer, and The Guardian v United Kingdom; The Sunday Times v United Kingdom (The Spycatcher Case) (1991) 14 EHRR 229,
U,Baxi,. ‘Voices of suffering and the future of human rights’ (1998) 8 Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 125-70
S, Moller et al, “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999) in M, Dembour op cit page 163
J, Fortin, “Children’s Rights and the Developing Law (Second edition, London Butterworths, 2003) pages 550 to 566

M,Dembour, ‘Diversity or commonality: The power to toss the human rights coin’, (2005) Mediterranean Journal of Human Rights 65-91.
S, Freedman. ‘European Community Discrimination Law: A Critique’ (1992) lU 119-134
K,Lenaerts, and E, De Smijter, ‘A Bill of Rights for the EU’ (200!) 38 CMLRev.273
L, Besselink, ‘Entrapped by the Maximum Standard: On Fundamental Rights, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the European Union’ (l998) 35 CMLRev.629
J,Coppell, and A,O’Neill, ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’ (1992) 12 Legal Studies 227
E. Fierro, ‘Legal Basis and Scope of the Human Rights Clause in EC Bilateral Agreements’ [2001] ELI 41
S, Douglas Scott, ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Constitutional Document’ [2004] EHRLR37
B. De Witte and G. Toggenburg, ‘Human Rights and Membership of the European Union’, in S. Peers and

Books
M, Dembour, “Who believes in Human Rights?: Reflection on the European Convention” (Cambridge University Press) Page 155
J. Vincent, Human Rights and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986),
J,Donnelly, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (Ist edn, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989), 107-60; (2nd edn, 2003), 71-119;
H, Steiner and P,Alston, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), at 372-4.
H,Barnett, “Constitutional & Administrative Law” (Seventh Edition, Routledge Cavendish) page 466
A, Kuper, Anthropology and Anthropologists: The Modern British School (3rd edn, London: Routledge, 1996).
N,Blake, and R, Huzain, “Immigration, Asylum and Human Rights” (Oxford University Press, 2003) page 349
Harris, O’Boyle and Warwick, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Butterworths, 1995) page 159.
G, Clayton, “Textbook on Immigration and Asylum Law” (Oxford University Press, 2008) page 94
L, Vedsted-Hansen in F. Nicholson and P. Twomey (eds), Refugee Rights and Realities: Evolving International Concepts and Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 1999) page275.
R, Dworkin, “Taking Rights Seriously” (Duckworth, 1977) page vii sources.
H, Barnett, ‘On science and human rights’ (l948) 50 American Anthropologist 352-5.
P. Alston, et al, “The EU and Human Rights” (Oxford University Press, 1999) chapter 1,
P, Craig and G, Deburca, “EU Law: Text, Case and Materials” (4th Edition, Oxford University Press) page 379
J,Cowan et al Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001);
A, Kuper, Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard :University Press, 1999)
A,Williams, The Irony of Human Rights in The European Union (Oxford University Press, 2004)
P, Van Djik, G, Van Hoof, “Theory and Practice of the European Convention in Human Rights (Second Edition, Deventer, 1990) page 604
R,Fox et al , Anthropology Beyond Culture (Oxford: Berg,2002)
Van Dijk and G. Van Boof, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (3rd edn., Kluwer, 1998),21.
J, Donelly, “Universal Human Rights” (1st Edition) pages 119- 120M,
R, Clayton and H, Tomlinson, “The Law of Human Rights” (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), page 274,
M, Greenberg, “How facts make law” in S, Hershovitz, “Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin” (Oxford University Press) page 225
A. Ward (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart, 2004), 59.
A,Williams, EU Human Rights Policies: a Study in Irony (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004) 139.
D, Chalmers and A, Tomkins, “European Union Public Law” (Cambridge University Press) page 232
P,Craig and G, Deburca, “The Evolution of EU Law” (Oxford University Press) Page 520

Cases
Handyside v United Kingdom [1976] 1 EHRR 737
Natson and Belmann [1976] ECR 1185, 1207
Ministere Public y. Mutsch [1985] ECR 2681,
D v Council [2001] ECR I-4319
Hauer v. Land Rheinland-Pfalz [1979] ECR 3727
International Handelsgesellschaft v. Einfuhr- und Vorratstelle fur Getreide und Futtermittel [1970] ECR 1125.
Schmidberger v Austria [2003] ECR 1-5659
T v United Kingdom [1999] ECHR 30 EHRR 121
X v Germany 1 DR 65.
C, Geertz,. ‘Anti anti -relativism’ (1984) 86 American Anthropologist 263-78
Tyrer v United Kingdom 25 April 1978, Series A, No. 26, (1979-1980) 2 EHRR
Johnston and Others v Ireland [1986]
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department; X v Same [2005] 2 AC 68,
Sunday Times v United Kingdom (The Sunday Times case) (1979) 2 EHRR 245,
Golder v United Kingdom [l975] ECHR, Series A, Vol 8
Silver and others v United Kingdom (1983) (1983) 5 EHRR 347
Otto-Preminger Institut v Austria (1995) 19 EHRR 34; (l994) ECHR

Legislation
EC Treaty,
European Convention on Human Rights

P, Craig and G, De burca, “EU Law Text , Cases and Materials” (Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press 2008)

EC Treaty

Directive 2006/54,

Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority

Danfoss1,

(Wiener Gebietskrankenkasse2).

(Enderby v Frenchay3).

(see Royal Copenhagen4).

Nimz v Freie und Hansestadt5.

Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange6,

Directive 2006/54,

(Dekker v VJV Centrum7);

Directive 79/7

Commission v Italy8,

Brachfeld9,

Bresciani10,

Humblot11,

Commission v French at para 40).

Chemial Farmaceutici v DAF12,

(Commission v Greece13).

The Cambridge University online dictionary http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=5041&dict=CALD accessed 11 January 2008

Simmenthal (106/77), Costa v ENEL (6/64) and Van Gend (26/62).

P, Craig and G, De Burca, “The Evolution of EU Law” (2003, Oxford University Press)

B, Witte, “Direct Effect, Supremacy and the Nature of Legal Order” in P, Craig and G, De Burca, “The Evolution of EU Law” (2003, Oxford University Press)

E, Cross, “Pre-emption of Member State Law in the European Economic Community: A Framework for Analysis (1992) 29 CML Rev 447

H.W.R Wade, “Sovereignty-Revolution or Evolution (1996) 112 Law Quarterly Review 568

Confirmation from the ECJ in relation to this came in Nimz v City of Hamburg Case C-184/89

S, Weatherill, “Law and Integration in the European Union (OUP, 1995) 106

W, Van Gerven, “Bridging the Gap Between Community and National Laws: Towards a Principle of Homgeneity in the Field of Legal Remedies? (1995) 32 CML Rev 679, 686-95

J, Weiler, “The Transformation of Europe”, (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2403, 2414

Report of the Court of Justice on Certain Aspects of the Application of the Treaty on European Union May 1995:

P, Craig, G, De Burca, “EU Law Text and materials” (Oxford University Press, 2008) page 379 http://ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relations/human_rights/intro/index.htm#7 accessed 11 January 2009

P, Alston, J Heenan and M, Bustelo (eds), “The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999) and

A, von Bogdandy, “The European Union as a Human Rights Organisation: Human Rights and the Core of the European Union” (200) 37 CMLRev 1307

S, Besson, “The EU and Human Rights: Towards a Post National Human Rights Institution” [2006] HRLRev

A, Williams, “The Irony of Human Rights in the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2004)

K, Roth, “Filling the Leadership: Where is the European Union? (Human Rights Watch World Report 2007).

C, Teitgen-Colly, “The European Union and Asylum: An illusion of Protection” (2006) 43 CLMRev 1503.

Rutili v Minister for the Interior [1975] Case 36/75

Watson and Belmann [1976] Case 118/75

Parliament, Council and Commision [1977] OJ C103/1

J, Weiler, “The European Court at a Crossroads: Community Human Rights and Member State Action” in F, Capotori et al, “Du Droit International au Droit de I’ Integration (Nomos, 1987) 839 – 841.

F, Capotori et al, “Du Droit International au Droit de I’ Integration (Nomos, 1987) 839 – 841.

X v Commission Cases T-121/89,

A v Commision [1994] ECR II-179,

H S v Council [1992] ECR II-1869

K v Commision [1989] ECR 2841

Open Door Counselling Ltd and Dublin Well Woman Centre v Ireland (1992) 15 EHRR 244

Grogan Case C -159/90

ERT Case C – 260/89

Lentia v Austria (1994 )17 EHRR 93

Hoechst [1989] ECR 2859

Niemetz Series A No 251 (1992) 16 EHRR 97

Orkem Case 374/87

Funke v France Series A No. 256A (1993) 16 EHRR 297

European Court of Justice cases
Case 6/64 Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 585.
Case C-540/03 European Parliament v Council [2006] ECR I-5769.
Case 44/79 Hauer v Land Rheinland-Pfalz [1979] ECR 3727.
Case 4/73 Nold v Commission [1974] ECR 491.
Case C-131/03 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings v Commission [2006] ECR I-7795.
Case 1/58 Stork v High Authority [1959] ECR 17 Para 26.
Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos [1963] ECR 13.
Netherlands v Parliament and Council [2001] ECR 1-7079.

Rechnungshof v Osterreichisches Rundfunk [2003] ECR 1-4919.

Commission v Germany [l989] ECR 1263.

Prais v Council [1976] ECR 1589, ERT v DEP [1991] ECR 1-2925,

National Panasonic v Commission [1980] ECR 2033;

Lindquist [2003] ECR I-12971,

Van Eick v Commission [1968] ECR 329.

Stauder v City of Ulm [1969] ECR 419.

Frontini v Ministero Delle Finanze [1974] 2 CMLR 372

German Cases
Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v. Einfuhr- und Vorratstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel (Solange I) [1974] 2 CMLR 540.
Re Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft (Solange II), Decision of 22 Oct. 1986 [1987] 3 CMLR 225.
Legislation and Treaties
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2007/C202/01).
EC Treaty (Treaty of Rome, as amended).
Explanations Relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights (2007/C303/02).
The Joint Declaration by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, OJ 1977 C 103.
Treaty on European Union.
Treaty of Lisbon.
Human Rights Act 1998 (UK).
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland).
Articles, Books and Websites
Paul Craig, ‘Competence and Member State Autonomy Causality, Consequence and Legitimacy’ (2009) Forthcoming; Oxford Legal Studies Research accessed 8 December 2009.
Paul Craig, ‘The Treaty of Lisbon, process, architecture and substance’ (2008) E.L. Rev. 137.

Pasquale De Sena and Maria Chiara Vitucci, ‘The European courts and the Security Council: between dedoublement fonctionnel and balancing of values: a rejoinder to Grainne de Burca, Andre Nollkaemper and Iris Canor’ [2009] E.J.I.L. 889.

Nigel G. Foster, ‘The German constitution and EC membership’ [1994] P.L. 392.
Claudina Richards, ‘The supremacy of Community law before the French Constitutional Court’ [2006] E.L. Rev. 499.
Niamh Nic Shuibhne, ‘Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law’ (2009) E.L. Rev. 230.

Jukka Snell, ‘“European Constitutional Settlement”, an ever closer union, and the Treaty of Lisbon: democracy or relevance?’ (2008) 33(5) E.L.Rev. 619.
Phil Syrpis, ‘The Treaty of Lisbon: much ado…but about what?’ [2008], I.L.J. 219.

Paul Craig and Grainne De Burca, EU Law Text, Cases and Materials (4thedn Oxford, Oxford 2008).
Nigel Foster (ed.), Blackstone’s EU Treaties & Legislation 2009-2010 (20thedn Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009).

Schuman Declaration accessed 1 December 2009.
accessed 1 December 2009.
P. Alston and J. Weiler, “’An Ever Closer Union” in need of a Human Rights Policy’ (1998) 9 BIIL 658, 665-9.

N, Foster, “Blackstone’s: EU Treaties & Legislation 2009 – 2010” (Oxford University Press) page 4

D, Chalmers, “European Union Public Law” (Cambridge University Press) Page 234

A v. Bogdandy, ‘The European Union as a Human Rights Organization? Human Rights and the Core of the European Union’ (2000) 27 CML Rev. 1307, 1319-20
L Besselink, ‘Entrapped by the Maximum Standard: On Fundamental Rights, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the European Union’ (l998) 35 CML Rev. 629
M. Avbelj, The European Court oflustice and the Question of Value Choices, Jean Monnet Working Paper 6/04.
J. Weiler, ‘Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Boundaries: On Standards and Values in the Proleclion of lIuman Rights’ in N. Neuwahl andA. Rosas, The European Union and Human Rights (The Hague, Martijnus Nijhoff, 1995) 51,52-3
C. Leben. ‘Is there a European Approach to Human Rights?’ in P. Alston (ed.), TheEU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999).
J,Coles, “Textbook: Law of the European Union” (0ld Bailey Press) page 148
B, De Witte, “Direct Effect, Supremacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order” in P, Craig and G, De Burca, “The Evolution of EU Law” (Oxford University Press) Page 177)
K. Gunther. ‘The Legacies of injustice and Fear: a European Approach to Human Rights and their Effects on Political Culture’ in 1’. Alston (ed.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999).
U. Scheuner, ‘Fundamental Rights in European Community Law and in National Constitutional Law’ (l975) l2 CML Rev. 171, l73-4)
M. Cantabia, ‘The Italian Constitutional Court and the Relationship between the Italian Legal System and the European Union’ in A-M. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet and J. Weiler (eds.), The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence (Oxford, Hart, 1998
A, Brandtner and A. Rosas, ‘Human Rights and the External Relations of the European Community: an Analysis of Doctrine and Practice’ (199H) 9 EJIL 468)
I, Ward, ,’Making Sense of Integration: a Philosophy of Law for the European Community’ (I993) 17 Journal of European Integration 101, 128-9 and 132-3.
O. de Schutter, The Implementation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights through the Open Method of Coordination, Jean Monnet Working Paper 7/04.,
G. de Barca, ‘The Drafting of the ED Charter of Fundamental Rights (2001) 26 ELRev.126
A. Williams: EU Human Rights Policies: a Study in Irony (Oxford, University Press, 2004) 159-60)
J. Coppell and A O’Neill. ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously’ (1992) 29 CML Rev 669.
J. Weiler and N. Lockhart, “’Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: the European Court and Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence, Part I’ (l995) 32 eML Rev. 51;
J. Weiler and N. Lockhart, ‘’’Taking Rights Seriously” : the European Court and Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence, Part II’ (I995) 32 CML Rev. 579)
M. de la Torre, ‘The Law Beneath Rights’ Feet: Preliminary Investigation for a Study of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2002) 8 European Law Journal 513, 533-5 ·
C, Engel, ‘The European Charter of Fundamental Rights: a Changed Political Opportunity Structure and its Normative Consequences’ (2001) 7 ELI 151,159.
P. Eeckhout, ‘The EU Charter on Fundamental Rights and the Federal Question’ (2002) 39 CML Rev. 945,95l.
D. Ashiagbor, ‘Economic and Social Rights in the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2004) I European Human Rights Law Review 62
C. McCrudden, The Future of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Jean Monnet Working Paper 13/01 )

Berry E. and Hargreaves S., European Union Law, (2007) Oxford University Press

Consolidated Version of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, Official Journal of the European Union, C321 E/37 (29.12.06)

Craig P., and De Burca G., EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, (2007) Oxford University Press

Elliot F. and Charter D., Cameron defies Eurosceptics by backing down from EU confrontation, The Times, November 5 2009

Fairhurst J., Law of the European Union, (2007) Longman

Hartley T., The Foundations of European Community Law, (2007) Oxford University Press

Horspool M. and Humphreys M., European Union Law, (2006) Oxford University Press

Ross M., “Beyond Francovich”, 56 Modern Law Review (1993), 55-73

Steiner J., “From Direct Effects to Francovich: Shifting Means of Enforcement of
Community Law”, 18:1 European Law Review (1993), p3-22

Steiner J., Woods L. and Twigg-Flesner C., Textbook on EC Law, (2006) Oxford University Press

Tridimas T., “Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down?”, 38 Common Market Law Review (2001), 310-332

Weatherill S., Cases and Materials on EU Law, (2007) Oxford University Press

Additional Sources

F, Morgenstern, ‘Judicial Practice and the Supremacy of International law’, (1950) 27 The British Year Book of International Law 42

G. Bermann, ‘French Treaties and French Courts: Two Problems in Supremacy’ (1979)/CLQ458,

WWF v Commission Case T-105/95, Smanor v Commission Case T-182/97

Petrei v Commission Case T-191

P, Craig & G, De Burca, “EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials” (Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition, 2008) page 744

B, De Witte, “Direct Effect, Supremacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order” in P, Craig and G, De Burca, “The Evolution of EU Law” (Oxford University Press,) page 177

L, Kramer, “Monitoring Application of Community Law: Submission to the Hearing of the European Parliament (Committee on Legal Affairs), Feb 2006.
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/comparl/juri/hearings/20060223/kraemer_en.pdf

C, Harlow and R, Rawlings, “Accountability and Law Enforcement: The Centralized EU Infringement Procedure” (2006) 31 ELRev 447,
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/eulaw index_en.htm

Star Fruit v Commission Case 247/87

Bavarian Lager Company v Commisssion Case T-309/97

J, Winter, “Direct Applicability and Direct Effect-Two Distinct and Different Concepts in Community . Law’ (1972) 9 CMLR 425
D. Wyatt. ‘New legal Order. Or Old?’ (l982) 7 ELRev. 147,153
B. de Witte, ‘Retour Ii Costa. La primaute du droit cornmunautaire it la lumiere du droit international’ [1984] Revue trimestrielle de droit Europeen425,

P. Craig, “Once upon a Time in the West: Direct Effect and the Federalization of EEC law” [1992] OJLS 453, 463 – 70

M. Ruffert. ‘Rights and Remedies in European Community Law: A Comparative View· (l997) 34 CML Rev 307, 310

P, Pescatore, ‘The doctrine of direct effect an infant disease of community law” (I983) 8 EL Rev 155, 177

E.D. Cross, “Pre-emption of Member State law in the European Economic Community: A Framework for Analysis” (I 992) 29 CMLRel’. 447

F, Synder, “The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools and Techniques” (1993) 56 Modern Law Review

C, Harlow, “European Adminstrative Law and the Global Challenge” in P, Craig and G, De Burca, “The Evolution of EU Law” (Oxford University Press 2003) Page 271

C. Hartley, The Foundations of European Community LaIl’(3rd edn., Clarendon, 1994) 470-507

H, Bronkhorst. ‘The Valid Legislative Act as a Cause of liability of the Communities·, in H. Schermers, , Heukels and P, Mead “Non-Contractual Liability of the Communities (Martinus Nijhoff, 1988) 13

B, Laffan, ‘From Policy Entrepreneur to Policy Manager: The Challenge Facing the European Commission” (1997) 4 J of Eur Pub Pol 422

T, Christiansen “A Maturing Bureaucracy? The Role of the Commission in the Policy Making Process” in J, Richardson, “European Union: Power and Policymaking (Routledge, 1996)
A, Kreher,’ Agencies in the EC-a Step Towards Administrative Integration in Europe’ (1997) 4 J Pol Eur Pub page 422
M. Everson ‘Independent Agencies: Hierarchy Beaters’ (I995) I European Law Journal 189.

J, Fairhurst, “Law of the European Union”, (Longman Publishing 2007)

EC Treaty

R. v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal. Ex parte Antonissen

Commission v. French Republic [1974J ECR 359

Commission v. Hellenic Republic [1998] ECR 1-6601.

Simutenkov v. Ministerio de Educacion y Cultura [2005] ECR 1-2579.

Defrenne v Sabena [1978] ECR 136.

Chacon Navas C-13/05

Mangold v. Rudiger Helm [2005] ECRI-9981. C-144/04.

P, Craig & G, De Burca, “EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials” (Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition, 2008) page 876

Razzouk and Beydoun v. Commission [1984] ECR 1509, Cases 75/82 and 117/82 paragraph 16,

P v. S. and Cornwall County Council [1996] ECR 1-2143 Case C-13/94.

Directive 2006/54

Hellnut Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen [1997] ECR I-6363

Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist [2000] ECR I-5539

Ministere Public and Direction du Travail et de I’Emploi v. Levy [1993] ECR I-4287 Case C-158/

Levin v Staatssecretaris Van Justitie [1982] ECR 1035

Kempf v Staatsecretaris van Justitie [1986] ECR 1741

Steyrnann v. StaatsecretarisvanJustitie [1988] ECR6159

R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] ECR 1-7091

Zhu and Chen v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] ECR 1-9925

Grzelczyk C-184/99

Commission v Belgium C-408/

Netherlands v reed Case 59/85

Directive 2004/38,

Regulation 1612/

Adoui and Cornualille [1982] ECR 1665

Ministre de I’Interieur v Olazabal [2002] ECR I-

Rutili [1975] ECR 1219

Maria Martinez Sala v Freistaat Bayern [1998] ECR I2691

Angelo Ferlini v Centre hospitalier d Luxembourg [2000] ECR I-8081.

Cristini v SNCF [1975] ECR 1085 para 13

Ministere Public v Even and ONPTS [1979] ECR 2019

De Vos v Bielefeld [1996] ECR I-1417

Barnard, c., The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms (Oxford University Press, 2004) Page 22

Adinolfi, A., ‘Free Movement and Access to Work of Citizens of the New Member States; ‘the Transitional Measures’ (200S) 42 CMLRev.469

O’Keeffe, D., ‘Judicial Interpretation of the Public Service Exception to the Free Movement of Workers’, in D. Curtin and D. O’Keeffe (eds.), Constitutional Adjudication in European Community Law and National Law (Butterworths Ireland, 1992)

O’Leary, S., ‘The Free Movement of Persons and Services’, in P. Craig and G. De Burca (eds.), The Evolution ofEU Law (Oxford University Press, 1999), ch. 11 Page 377
E, Berry “The deportation of “virtual national” offenders: the impact of ECHR and EU law” Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law, 2009 Paragraph 2
N, Bernard ‘Discrimination and Free Movement in EC law· (l996) ICLQ 82-129.83

P, Craig and G, Deburca, “EU Law, Text Cases and Materials” (Fourth Edition) page 275
E. Spaventa in Dougan and Currie (eds), 50 Years of the European Treaties: Looking Back and Thinking Forward (Oxford: Hart Publishing, forthcoming, 2009).
L, Daniele ‘Non-Discriminatory Restrictions to the Free Movement of Persons· (l997) 22 ELRev. 191-200
1951 Refugee Convention,
E Lauterpacht and D Bethlehem ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement : Opinion’, Part 2, 2.1, p 87, in E Feller, V Türk and F Nicholson (eds) UNCHR’s Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge, CUP, 2003) available at http://www.unhcr.ord/publ/PUBL/419c75ce4.pdf (accessed 10 May 2010).
N, Shuibhne, “Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law” European Law Review, 2009
Samantha Currie”Free” movers? The post-accession experience of accession-8 migrant workers in the UK European Law Review, 2006

R Koslowski, ‘Intra-EU Migration, Citizenship and Political Union’ (1994) 32 JCMS 367-402,375

M.Ancini G. F., ‘The Free Movement of Workers in the Case-Law of the Court ofJustice’, in D. Curtin and D. O’Keeffe (eds.),I, Constitutional Adjudication in EC and National Law. Essays in Honour of Justice T. F. O’Higgins (Dublin, 1992)
O’LEARY, S.. ‘Employment and Residence for Turkish Workers and Their Families: Analogies with the Case-law of the Court of Justice on Article 48 EC’ in Scritti in onore di (Giitseppe Federico Malleilli, voL” (Milan, 1998) 73 1-767

Alter, K., Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2001)
R. Bieber, R. Dehousse, J. Pinder, and J. Weiler (eds.), 1992: One European Market? (Nomos, 1988),336.

ROMERO, F., ‘Cross-border Population Movements’ in W. Wallace (ed.), The Dynamics of European Integration (London, 1990), 171-191, 182-183

ALTER, K., and MEUNIER-AITSAHALJA, S., ‘Judicial Politics in the European Community European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision’ (l994) 26 Comparative Political Studies 535

EHLER MANN, C.-D., ‘Harmonization versus Competition Between Rules’ (I 995) 3 European Review 333

POIARES MADuRo, M., ‘Keck: The End? The Beginning of the End? Or Just the End of the Beginning?’ (1994) 1 JJ EL 30

http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/free_movement_of_persons_asylum_immigration/l33154_en.htm
C, Vincenzi and J, Fairhurst “Law of the European Community” 3rd edition.
Wyatt & Dashwood “European Union Law” 5th edition
S, Hargreaves “EU law concentrate”
Barents, R., ‘Charges of Equivalent Effect to Customs Duties’ (1978) 15 CMLRev.415

Danusso, M., and Denton, R., ‘Does the European Court of Justice Look for a Protectionist Motive Under Article 95?’ (1990) 1 LIEI67

http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/doc_centre/citizenship/movement/doc/table_correspondence_en.pdf
http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/free_movement_of_persons_asylum_immigration/l33154_en.htm
Case 120178 Rewe-ZentraleAGv. Bundesmonopolverwaltungjiir Branntwein [1979] ECR 649.

Directive 70/50
Procureur du Roi v. Dassonville [1974] ECR 837

Campus Oil ltd. V. Minister for Industry and Energy [1984] ECR 2727

Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v de Smedt PvbA (Case 261/81)

WEATHERILL, S., ‘After Keck: Some thoughts on How to Clarify the Clarification’ (1996) 33 CMLRel’.885

MORTELMANS. K., ‘Article 30 of the EEC Treaty and Legislation Relating to Market Circumstances: Time to Consider a New Definition’ (1991 >’ 28 CMLRev. 115

Armstrong, K., ‘Mutual Recognition’, in C. Barnard and J. Scott (eds.), The Law of the Single European Market, Unpacking the Premises (Hart, 2002), ch. 9

Greaves, R., ‘Advertising Restrictions and the Free Movement of Goods and Services’ (1998) 23 ELRev. 305

Criminal Proceedings against Keck and Mithouard [1993] ECR 1-6097
A, Tryfonidou, “Further steps on the road to convergence among the market freedoms” European Law Review, 2010
Konsumentombudsmannen (KO) v. De Agostini (Svenska) Forlag AD and TV-Shop i Sverige AD [19971 ECR 1-3843
Commission v UK (UHT Milk case) (124/81)
Commission v UK (Turkey Imports case) (40/82
Commission v Germany (Beer and Sausage Purity) (178/84 and 274/87)

Commission v. Hellenic Republic [1998] ECR 1-6601.

Hellnut Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen [1997] ECR I-6363

R. v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal. Ex parte Antonissen [1991] ECR 1-745

P, Craig & G, De Burca, “EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials” (Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition, 2008)

Mangold v. Rudiger Helm [2005] ECRI-9981. C-144/04.

Defrenne v Sabena [1978] ECR 136.

Razzouk and Beydoun v. Commission [1984] ECR 1509, Cases 75/82 and 117/82 paragraph 16,

P v. S. and Cornwall County Council [1996] ECR 1-2143 Case C-13/94.

Directive 2006/54

Kempf v Staatsecretaris van Justitie [1986] ECR 1741

EC Treaty

Chacon Navas C-13/05

Commission v. French Republic [1974J ECR 359

Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist [2000] ECR I-5539

Ministere Public and Direction du Travail et de I’Emploi v. Levy [1993] ECR I-4287 Case C-158/

Levin v Staatssecretaris Van Justitie [1982] ECR 1035

R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] ECR 1-7091

Rutili [1975] ECR 1219

Grzelczyk C-184/99

Adoui and Cornualille [1982] ECR 1665
Commission v Belgium C-408/

Steyrnann v. StaatsecretarisvanJustitie [1988] ECR6159

Netherlands v Reed Case 59/85

Directive 2004/38,

Zhu and Chen v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] ECR 1-9925

Regulation 1612/68

Ministre de I’Interieur v Olazabal [2002] ECR I-

Maria Martinez Sala v Freistaat Bayern [1998] ECR I2691

De Vos v Bielefeld [1996] ECR I-1417

Angelo Ferlini v Centre hospitalier d Luxembourg [2000] ECR I-8081.

Ministere Public v Even and ONPTS [1979] ECR 2019
Cristini v SNCF [1975] ECR 1085
A, Saunders and R, Young, “From Suspect to Trial” in M, Maguire et al, “The Oxford Handbook of Criminology”,(Oxford University Press, 2008)

European Convention (1950) (Cmd 8969)

Human Rights Act 1998

Funke v France EHRR 297

Saunders v UK 23 EHRR 313

R v Brady [2005] 1 Cr App R 5 CA

R (Kent Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v Director of Serious Fraud Office [2005] 1 WLR 1302 CA (Civ Div)

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

Wong Kam-Ming v R [1980] AC 247

Schenck v Switzerland 13 EHRR 242

X v Germany 11 EHRR 84

Khan v UK (2001) 31 EHRR 45

A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No.2) [2006] 2 AC 221 HL

Richard and Thomas et al, “Archbold 2007: Criminal Pleading Evidence and Practice” (Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)

J, Sprack, “Emmings on Criminal Procedure”, (Oxford University Press, 9th Edition 2002)

Heaney and McGuinness v Ireland (2001) 33 EHRR 12

S, Ramage, “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE FRAUD” http://wlv.openrepository.com/wlv/bitstream/2436/14408/2/Ramage%20MPhil%20thesis%202007.pdf Accessed 30 January 2009

A, Cassese, “International Criminal Law” (Oxford University Press 2nd Edition)

Modaq Business Briefing, “The privilege against self-incrimination – a comparative perspective” 25 September 2005
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-4772841/Right-to-Silence-or-Privilege.html accessed 30 January 2009

A, O’Neill, “Self-incrimination still a grey area: Examination of the right to remain silent and the privilege against self-incrimination in road traffic cases following the appeal court decision in Brown v Stott
” (The Journal Online, 1 March 2000)
http://www.journalonline.co.uk/Magazine/45-3/1000842.aspx dated accessed 30 January 2009

Bond, T et al, “Family Law”, (2006: Oxford University Press) p212

Bridge, S, “Money, Marriage and Cohabitation”, August 2006 Fam Law 641

Law Commission Paper 179 “Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown” May 2006

Smulian, M, “Cracks in the System” Law Society Gazette 4th September 2003

Cordle v Cordle [2002] 1 FLR 207

Matrimonial Causes Act 1859

Matrimonial Causes Act of 1973

Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] FLR

N v N (Financial Provisions: Sale of Company) [2001] 2 FLR 69

P v P [2002] EWHC Fam 887

Wells v Wells [2002] 2 FLR 97

White v White [2001] 1 AC 596 HL

Bond, T et al, “Family Law”, (2006: Oxford University Press) p212

Bridge, S, “Money, Marriage and Cohabitation”, August 2006 Fam Law 641

Law Commission Paper 179 “Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown” May 2006

Smulian, M, “Cracks in the System” Law Society Gazette 4th September 2003

Books
J Herring, Family Law-third edition, (Pearsons Education Limited 2007.)
M Banton, Promoting Racial Harmony, (Cambridge University Press 1985) p 47
By American Sociological Society, ‘Problems of Social Assimilation’, (University of Chicago Press 1914)
R Alba, V Nee, Remaking the American Mainstream, (Harvard University Press 2005)
J Smolicz, Transforming Curriculum for a Culturally Diverse Society, Chapter Three- ‘Multiculturalism and an Overarching Framework of Values: Some Educational Responses for Ethnically Plural Societies’, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1996) pg 59-69
D Taylor, Bilingualism, Multiculturalism, and Second Language Learning, ‘The Social Psychology of Racial and Cultural Diversity: Issues of Assimilation and Multiculturalism’, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1991)

Articles
R Williams, Civil and religious law in England: a religious perspective, Ecclesiastical Law Journal 2008
S Bano, In persuit of religious and legal diversity: a response to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the ‘Sharia debate’ in Britain, Ecclesiastical Law Journal 2008.

T Welch, The Prohibition of the Muslim headscarf: contrasting international approaches in policy and law, Denning Law Journal 2007 19:
S Poulter, Muslim headscarves in school: contrasting legal approaches in England and France, Oxford J Legal Studies 1997 17:
S Poulter (1987) ‘Ethnic Minority Customs, English Law and Human Rights’, ICLQ, vol. 36,
Khan.S, Why Muslim Women Should Thank Straw, The Times October 9 2006.
A Tucker, The Archbishop’s unsatisfactory legal pluralism, Public Law 2008.
U Khan, New Sharia law marriage contract gives Muslim women rights
A Lester, P Uccellari, Extending the equality duty to religion, conscience and belief: Proceed with caution, European Human Rights Law Review 2008.

L Blom-Cooper, Press Freedom: constitutional right or cultural assumption? Public Law 2008.

Y, Said, “In defence of Archbishop Rowan’s lecture ‘Civil and Religious Law in
England: A Religious Perspective” Faculty of Divinity Honorary Assistant Chaplain, Corpus Christi College Cambridge
http://nifcon.anglicancommunion.org/resources/documents/In%20defence%20of%20Archbishop%20Rowans%20lecture%20Civil%20and%20Religious%20Law%20in%20England%20Yazeed%20Sayeed.pdf accessed 31 December 2008
Coulson, Conflicts and Tensions in Islamic Jurisprudence, 43-96; Joseph
Schacht, ‘The Law’ in von Grunebaum, Unity and Variety in Muslim Civilization,
76.
R, Hopkins & C, Yeginsu “Religious Liberty in British Courts: A Critique and Some Guidance” Harvard International Law Journal http://www.harvardilj.org/online/134 Accessed 31 December 2008
K, Lundquist, “Accomodating Sharia Law Would be a Mistake” 2 October 2008 http://www.godspy.com/opinion/why-accommodating-sharia-law-would-be-a-mistake/ Accessed 31 December 2008
A, Ivereigh “Why the Bearded one is right about Sharia Law” 2 August 2008 http://www.godspy.com/opinion/why-the-bearded-one-is-right-about-sharia-law/ Accessed 31 December 2008
A, Ivereigh, “Defending the Archbishop its all in the details” 2 November 2008 http://godspy.com/opinion/defending-the-archbishop-its-all-in-the-details/ Accessed 31 December 2008
M, Jasser “Exclusive: Slouching towards Sharia”, http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.4/pub_detail.asp Accessed 31 December 2008
Websites
http://www.frankfuredi.com/index.php/site/article/179/- (accessed on 17 November 2008.)

A Kirby, Archbishop guilty of innocence- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7239786.stm- (accessed on 31 October 2008.)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/23/religion-islam- (accessed on 31 October 2008.)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2518720/New-Sharia-law-marraige-contract-gives-Muslim-women-rights.html- (accessed on 17 November 2008.)

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23436203-details/Adoption+of+Islamic+Sharia+law+in+Britain+is+‘unavoidable’,+says+Archbishop+of+Canterbury/article.do- (accessed on 17 November 2008.)

http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed24684- (accessed on 17th November 2008.)
M Shipton, Sharia law could have a role in UK, says top judge, http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2008/07/04/sharia-law-could-have -a-role-in-uk-says-top-judge-91466-21226613/- (accessed on 17th November 2008.)

http://www.trivia-library.com/b/origins-of-sayings-when-in-rome-do-as-the-romans-do.htm- (accessed on 16 November 2008)

http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/uk-discriminatory-for-hair-salon-not-to-hire-headscarf-wearer/- (accessed on 20 November 2008)

http://www.rawa.org/rules.htm- (accessed on 25 December 2008)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/3948737/Carefully-does-it-Dr-Rowan-Williams-were-listening.html- (accessed on 25 December 2008.)

http://www.thetimes.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=908676- (accessed 25 December 2008)

M Shipton, Sharia law could have a role in UK, says top judge, http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2008/07/04/sharia-law-could-have -a-role-in-uk-says-top-judge-91466-21226613/ (accessed on the 17 November 2008.

Statutes

S1 Family Law Act 1996.

Arbitration Act 1996.

Authorities

Baindail v Baindail (1946) P.122, 129.

EC Treaty

Commission v Ireland [1982] ECR 4005

Commission v United Kingdom [1985] ECR 201

Commission v Ireland [1988] ECR 4929

Commission v France [1985] ECR 1356.

Directive 70/50

P, Craig and G, De Burca, “EU Law Text, Cases and Materials” (Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2008) page 668 & 677

Rewe-Zentrale Ag v Budnesmonopolverwaltung fur Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon) [1979] ECR 649

Ministere Public. Deserbais [1988] ECR 4907

Smanor [1988] ECR 4489

Drei Glocken v. USL Centro-Sud [1988] ECR 4233 Case 407/85

GB-INNO-BM v. Confederation du Commerce Luxembourgeois Asbl [1990] ECR 1-667 case C-362/88

Commission v. Ireland [2001J ECR 1-4619

Criminal Proceedings against Bellamy and English Shop Wholesale SA [2001] ECR I-2795 Case C-123/00,

ATRAL SA v. Belgium [2003] ECR I-4431 Case C-14/02

Italian Staley. Gilli and Andres [1980] ECR 2071 Case 788/79

Openbaar Ministerie v. Van Der Veldt [1994] ECR 1-3537 Case C-17/93

Nalter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v. de Smedt Pvba [1982] ECR 3961

Commission v. Germany [1994] ECR 1-2039 Case C-317/92

Groupement des Producteurs, Importeurs et Agents Gemraux d’Eaux Minerales Etrangeres (Piageme) Asbl v. Peeters Pvba [1991] ECR 1-2971 Case C-369/89.

Euractiv.com July 2009, “Ukraine Deputy PM: We chose a realistic path to EU integration”
http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/ukraine-deputy-pm-chose-realistic-path-eu-integration/article-184534

Weatherill and P. Beaumont, EU Law (3rd edn., Penguin, 1999),608.

E. White. “In Search of the limits to Article 30 of the EEC Treaty” (1989) 26 CMLRev. 235, 246-247

Mortelmans, ‘Article 30 of the EEC Treaty and Legislation Relating to Market Circumstances: Time to Consider a New Definition’ (l991) 28 C11LRev. 115, 130.

Geddo v Ente Nazionale Risi [1973] ECR 865

Commission v France Case C-265/95 [1997] ECR – I 6959

Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzuge v Austria [2003] ECR I-5659

ICI v Commission (Dyestuffs) Case 48/69

The Wood Pulp Case-129/85

Consten and Grudnig Case 58/64

Cement Association Case 8/72.

ACF Chiemiefarma NV v Commission [1970] ECR 661

Courage Ltd v Crehan [2001] ECR I-6297

Akerlof G A et al (2002) Brief, as Amici Curiae in support of Petitioners at 12, Eldred v.Ashcroft, No. 01 – 618

All Party Parliamentary Internet Group, “Digital Rights Management”: Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Internet Group, June 2006, http://www.apig.org.uk accessed 9 December 2008 page 7

Australian Copyright Amendment (Digital agenda) Act 2000

Beloff v Pressdram Ltd [1973] 1 All ER 241

B. Lindner, “Demolishing Copyright: The Implementation of the WIPO Internet Treaties in Switzerland”, E.I. P. R. 2005/27, pp. 481-488, 481.

Boldrin M and Levine D K (2005) IP and Market Size available at http://lev0111.dklevine.com/papers/scale22.pdf

British Broadcasting Corporation v Wireless League Gazette Publishing Co [1926] 1 Ch 433. (Ch 1926)

Bundesgesetz über das Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte (URG) vom 9. Oktober 1992.
378

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. 48)

Copyright Act of 1968

Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act of 2000

Copyright Law of Japan 1970
Law No. 48, promulgated on May 6, 1970 as amended by Law No. 77, of 15 June 1999. An unofficial http://www.cric.or.jp/cric_e/clj/clj.html accessed 9 December 2008

Digital millennium Copyright Act 1998

Directive 2001/29/EC

Express Newspapers v Liverpool Daily Post and Echo [1985] 1 WLR 1089

Green v New Zealand Broadcasting Corporation [1989] RPC 700

G, Westkamp, “The Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC in the Member States” (Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London) February 2007 ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-study-annex_en.pdf accessed 9 December 2007 page 441
K,Withers, “Intellectual Property and the Knowledge Economy: Does Copyright stifle other creative activity? Where does optimal protection lie?” February 2006 http://www.ippr.typepad.com accessed 9 December 2007 pages 16-17
I.R. Kerr, A. Maurushat, & S.T. Tacit, ‘Technological Protection Measures: Tilting at Copyright’s Windmill’, Ottawa L. Rev. 2002/34, pp.7- , at pp. 46-47.

Ladbroke v William Hill [1964] 1 WLR 273

Landes W M and Posner R A (2003) The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Laws Harvard University Press

L,Guibault et al, Study on the implementation and effect in Member States’ laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Executive Summary of final report Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam
February 2007, ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-exec-summary.pdf accessed 9December 2008 pg 3

L,Guibault et al, Study on the implementation and effect in Member States’ laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Final Report Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam
February 2007, ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-final-report.pdf accessed 9December 2008 pg 3

Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Marks and Spencer’s Plc [1999] RPC 536
Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK TV Ltd [1999] 1 W.L.R. 605
Sillitoe v McGraw-Hill Books [1983] FSR 545

Statutory Instrument SI 2003/2498 (“ The Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003).

T,Babbington Macaulay “Speech to the House of Commons on 5th February 1841”

The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property” 2006 http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/gowers_review_index.htm accessed 9 December 2008

T. Koshida, A Law Partly Amending the Copyright Act, Japan Copyright Office/Ministry
of Cultural Affairs, 1999, available at , 2: accessed 9 December 2008”

17 U. S. C. On the US implementation see: Gasser 2006, pp. 62 et seq.; C.D. Kruger, “Passing the Global Test: DMCA § 1201 as an International Model for Transitioning Copyright Law into the Digital Age”, Houston
Journal of International Law 2006/28, pp. 281-322; Cunard/Hill/Barlas 2004, pp. 45-69; cited in L, Guibault et al final report op cit.

WIPO Internet Treaties

T. Palmer. ‘Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach’ (1989) 12 Hamline L Rev. 261.

V. Fisher, ‘Property and Contract on the Internet’ (1998) 73 Chi.-Kent L. Rev.1203.

F. MacMillan, The Cruel ©: Copyright and Film [2002] EIPR 483

J. Cohen, ‘Fair Use Infrastructure for Copyright Management Systems’ (2001) 15 Harvard J. Of L. And Tech. 41;

P. Samuelson, ‘Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention Provisions Need to Be Revised’ (1999) 14 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 519
Copyright and Design Law: Report of the Committee to Consider the Law on Copyright and· Designs, chaired by Mr Justice Whitford of March 1977 (Cmnd 6732, paragraph 84).

Boldrin M and Levine D K (2005) IP and Market Size available at http://lev0111.dklevine.com/papers/scale22.pdf

O. Morgan, ‘Copyright, the Public Interest and Content Restrictions’ l2003) 8 Media and Arts L Rev 213.

G, Westkamp, “The Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC in the Member States” (Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London) February 2007 ec.europa.eu/internal

Australian Copyright Amendment (Digital agenda) Act 2000

All Party Parliamentary Internet Group, “Digital Rights Management”: Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Internet Group, June 2006, http://www.apig.org.uk

Law No. 48, promulgated on May 6, 1970 as amended by Law No. 77, of 15 June 1999. An unofficial http://www.cric.or.jp/cric_e/clj/clj.html

_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-study-annex_en.pdf

K,Withers, “Intellectual Property and the Knowledge Economy: Does Copyright stifle other creative activity? Where does optimal protection lie?” February 2006 http://www.ippr.typepad.com

Landes W M and Posner R A (2003) The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Laws Harvard University Press

L,Guibault et al, Study on the implementation and effect in Member States’ laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Executive Summary of final report Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam
February 2007, ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-exec-summary.pdf

L,Guibault et al, Study on the implementation and effect in Member States’ laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Final Report Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam
February 2007, ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-final-report.pdf

The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property” 2006 http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/gowers_review_index.htm accessed 9 December 2008

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

University of London v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601

L, Bentley and B, Sherman, “Intellectual Property” (Third Edition, Oxford University Press)

Sir Louis Mallet, Report of the Royal Commission on Copyright, C 2036 (l878) 24 PP.

A,Plant, ‘The Economics of Copyright’ (1934) Economica 167.

J. Garon, ‘Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy and Ethics· (2003) 88 Cornell Law Review 1278. 283-5

L. Strahilevitz, ‘Charismatic Code, Social Norms & the Emergence of Co-operation on the File-Swapping Networks’ (2003) 89 Virginia Law Rev 505
Informatierecht (Institute for Information Law. University of Amsterdam-IViR). “Recasting Copyright for the knowledge Economy” (2006), Ch 6.

S, Trosow, ‘The Illusive Search for Justificatory Theories: Copyright, Commodification and Capital’, (2003) ,16 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 217.

M, Spence, “Justifying Copyright” in D. McLean and K. Schubert, Dear Images: Art, Culture and Copyright. 388 (2002).

J. Hughes, “The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’ (1988) 77 Georgetown Law Journal 287

Designers Guild v. ‘Warns [2001] FSR 11.

Walter v. Lane [1900] AC 539.

J, Bentham “Manual of Political Economy, in J. Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, iii” (1843) 31, 71.

W, Landes and R. Posner, “An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law 118 Journal of Legal Studies 325

Gordon W. Gordon; “An Inquiry into the Merits of Copyright: The Challenges of Consistency, Consent and encouragement Theory” (1989) 41 Stanford Law Review 1343

Merrill Lynch’s Application [1989] RPC 561 (CA),

D. Davies, “The Early History of the Patent Specification” (1934) 50 LQR 86.

Kitch, “An Economic Review of the Patent System” (l977) 20 Journal of Law & Economics 265.

Asahi Kasei Kogyo [1991] RPC 485,532 (HL)

J.Aubrey, Justification of the Patent System’, in J. Phillips (ed.), Patents in Perspective (1985), Plant A, Plant, ‘The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions’ [1934] Economica 30.

Philips v Remington [1998] RPC 283

P, Mollerup, “Marks of Excellence: The History and Taxonomy of Trademarks” (1997) ;-42;

S. Diamond. “The Historical Development of Trademarks’ (l975) 65 TM Rep 265,272.

B, Pattishall. ‘Trade Marks and the Monopoly Phobia· (I 952) 42 TM Rep 588

R, Brown, “Advertising and the Public Interest: The Legal Protection of Trade Symbols”(1948) 57 Yale Journal 1l65, 1189.

R, Dreyfuss, ‘Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in The Pepsi Generation’ (I990) 65 Notre Dame Law Review 397, 397.

J. Litman, “Breakfast with Batman: The Public Interest in the Advertising Age’ (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal 1717”)

F, Schechter, “The Rational Basis of Trade Mark Protection” (l927) 40 Harvard Law Review 813, 831.

‘J, Swann and T, Davis, “Dilution: An Idea Whose Time Has Gone. Brand Equity as Protectable Property, The New/Old Paradigm” (l994) 84 TM Rep 267, 285.

E, Rogers, “The Social Value of Trade Marks and Brands” (l947) 37 TM Rep 249, 249.

P. Behrendt, ‘Trademarks and Monopolies: Historical and Conceptual. Foundations’ (1961) 51 TM Rep 853

W, Landes and R, Posner, “The Economics of Trademark Law” (19BB) 7B TM Rep 267.

E. Hamak, “The Quality Assurance Function of Trademarks” (1975) 65 TM Rep 318

Coco v Clarke [1969] RPC 41

E. Hettinger, “Justifications for Intellectual Property” (1989) 19 Philosophy and Public Affairs 31

L. Paine, “Trade Secrets and the Justifications of Intellectual Property: A Comment on Hettinger” (l99l) 20 Philosophy and Public Affairs 247

J. Stedman, ‘Trade Secrets’ (l962) 23 Ohio State Law Journal 4, 26

S, Warren and L. Brandeis. ‘The Right to Privacy’ 1890) 4 Harvard Law Review 193.

Attorney-General v Guardian [1990] AC 109

G. Jones. ‘Breach of Confidence-after Spycatcher’ (1990) 4 Current Legal Problems Page 48

Francis Day & Hunter v Bron [1963] Ch 587

Plix Products v Winstone [1986] FSR (92)

Pro Sieben Media v. Carlton UK Television” [1997] EMLR 509

R, Burrell, “Burrell & Coleman, “Copyright Exceptions: The Digital Impact (2005) Page 116.

Intellectual Property Office ( Taking Forward the Gowers Review /Intellectual Property (2008) page 21 –

Patents Act 1977

Harris’ Patent Application [1985] RPC 19

Electrolux v Hudson [1977] FSR 312,
W, Kingston, “What role now for European Patent Offices” [2003] EIPR 289
J, Philips, “Time to Close the Patent Office Doors?” [1990] EIPR 151.

Trade Mark Act 1994

Imperial Group v Philip Morris [1982] FSR 72

I. Klein, “No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies (2000); F C Coombe, The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties (1998) in L, Bentley and B, Sherman op cit page 717.

Seager v Copydex [1967] 2 All ER 415,

Peter Pan Manufacturing Corp v Corsets Silhouette Ltd [1963] 3 All ER 402

Human Rights Act 1998

R. Burrell, ‘Defending the Public Interest’ [2000] EIPR 394.

Ladbroke Football Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 All ER 465

Newspaper Licensing Agency v Marks and Spencers Plc [1999] EMLR

J, Griffiths, “Copyright Law After Ashdown-Time to Deal Fairly with the Public” [2002) IPQ 240

M. Birnhack, “ The Conflict Between Copyright Law and Freedom of Expression under the Human Rights Act 2003J Ent LR 24, 33,

J, Liu, “Copyright and Time: A Proposal’ (2002) 101 Michigan Law Review 409

J. Hughes, ‘Fair Use Across time’ (2003) 50 UCLA Law Review 775

Harvard/Onco-Mouse [1991] EPOR 525

General Motor Corp v Yplon [1999] ECR – 5421

Premier Brands v Typhoon Europe [2000] FSR 767

Saltman Engineering v Campbell Engineering [1948] 65 RPC

A-G v Guardian Newspapers (No.2) “Spycatcher [1990] 1 AC 109

Seagar v Copydex (No.1) [1967] 2 All ER 415

J, Cahir, “The Moral Preference for DRM ordered markets in the Digitally Networked Environment” Queen Mary Intellectual Research Institute, University of London page 1

WIPO Internet Treaties 1996

The Digital Millenium Copyright Act 1998

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 22 May 2001

Hadfield, ‘The Economics of Copyright: An Historical Perspective’ (1992) 38 Copyright Law Symposium (ASCAP) republished in R. Towse & R. Holzhauer, The Economics of Intellectual Property, (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2002)
S. Breyer, “The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies and Computer Programmes” (1970) 84 Harvard L. Rev. 281

White v Music Publishing Co v Apollo Co (1908) 209 US 1

Mazer v Stein 347 US 201,

M, Boldrin and D, Levine, “IP and Market Size” UCLA 2005 page 3

Burge v Swarbrick [2007] HCA 17

George Hensher v Restawile Upholstry (Lancs) [1976] AC 64

European Patent Convention1975

Wyeths Application [1985] RPC 545

Gale’s Application [1991] RPC 305, 322.

Community Trademark Regulations 40/94

BatMark R 5/97 -1 [1998] ETMR 449

Earl Spencer v UK [1998] 25 EIHRR CD 105

Von Hannover v Germany [2005] EHRR 1

Baigent and Leigh v The Random House Group [2006] EWHC 719 (ch)

Razencroft v Herbert [1980] RPC 193

Le Tallac, “The Protocol on Jurisdiction and the Recognition of Decisions in Respect of the Right to the Grant of a European Patent (1985) 16 IIC 318

Kirin-Amgen/Erythroprotein T412/93 [1995] EPOR 629

Arsenal FC v Reed Case C-206/01 [2002] ECR I -10273

Danrosch et al, “International Law: Cases and Materials 2 -3 (4th ed. 2001)

A, Cassese, “International Criminal Law”, (Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2008) page 4

A, Cassese, “International Law”, (Second Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) pages 153-237
Christopher Hale “Does the evolution of International Criminal law end with the ICC? The “roaming ICC”: a model international criminal court for a State-centric world of international law” date unknown http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3262/is_3-4_35/ai_n29430715/print?tag=artBody;col1 accessed 24 December 2008
Foreign and Commonwealth office “Explanatory Memorandum on the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime” United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organised Crime. Command Paper Number: 5580 http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/publications/treaty-command-papers-ems/explanatory-memoranda/…/unorgcrime accessed 24 December 2008
Foreign & Commonwealth Office http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/fco-in-action/global-network/crime/ – 24k accessed 24 December 2008
H, Kissinger, “The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction: Risking Judicial Tryanny”Foreign Affairs July / August, 2001 essay adapted from book, Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the 21st Century http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/general/2001/07kiss.htm accessed 24 December 2008
C, Hale, Does the evolution of International Criminal law end with the ICC? The “roaming ICC”: a model international criminal court for a State-centric world of international law
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3262/is_3-4_35/ai_n29430715/print?tag=artBody;col1 see also See e.g., Alison Purdy, The Kyoto Protocol, Guardian, Feb. 16, 2005, at http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,12374,1415660,00.html; Fact Sheet, infra note 334 (exhibiting an example of the world’s inability to agree on important world issues).
Accessed 23 December 2008

H, Kissinger, “The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction: Risking Judicial Tryanny”Foreign Affairs July / August, 2001 essay adapted from book, Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the 21st Century http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/general/2001/07kiss.htm accessed 24 December 2008

Tadic ICTY, TCII 1997

N, Robinson, “The Genocide Convention – A Commentary (New York: Institute of Jewish Affairs, 1960):

1926 Convention on slavery

The protocol of 1953
The 1929 International Convention for the suppression of Counterfeiting Currency

UN Convention against Torture of 1984

R v Jones et al House of Lords http://www.parliament.uk

UN Charter 1945

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia statute

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Statute a reference to the courts of Rwanda.

Delalic and others ICTY AC [2001]

Aleksovski (Appeal) ICTY AC [2000]

Bulatovic, Kosta ICTY (Slobodan Milosevic) [2005],

Special Court for Sierra Leone and Rule 10 (1) of the ETSP Regulation no.2000/15, s.10.

International Criminal Court Statute

Special Tribunal for Lebanon statute.
J, Forbes, “A Critique of Henry Kissinger’s
“The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction”World Federalist Movementhttp://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/general/2001/kisscrit.htm accessed 23 December 2008
Erdemovi (Appeal) ICTY AC 7

M, Drumbl, Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law” (Cambridge University Press, 2007),

Social Science Research Network, Fichtelberg, Aaron, Liberal Values in International Criminal Law: A Critique of Erdemovi(March 2008). Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 3-19, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1156702 or DOI:  mqm026 accessed 23 December 2008

Review Essay, Deconstructing International Criminal Law
Social Science Research Network, Heller, Kevin Jon,Review Essay, Deconstructing International Criminal Law. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 106, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014964

Prosecutor v. Blaskic, Case No. IT-95-14-A, Judgment, [paragraph][paragraph]110, 139, 141 (July 29, 2004), available at http://www.un.org/icty/blaskic/appeal/judgement/bla-aj040729e.pdf.

UN Convention on Transnational Organised Crime

W, Morrison, “Jurispudence: From the Greeks to post-modernism” (Cavendish Publishing Limited, 2005) page 423

Austin’s Jurispudence, 1873: Lectures XXXVII and XXXVIII

HLA Hart in “The Concept of Law, 1961) pages 88 – 89

M, Greenberg, “How facts make law” in S, Hershovitz, “Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin” (Oxford University Press, 2008) page 225 ·

Raz, “Ethics in public domain” 210 (1994)

R, Dworkin “Taking Rights Seriously” (2005, Duckworth) page 17,

R, Dworkin, “Laws Empire” (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press) Chap 1, W, Morrison op cit page 422

R, Dworkin, “Taking Rights Seriously” (Duckworth, 1977) page 22

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932].

R, Dworkin, “Law as Interpretation, in the politics of interpretation (WJT Mitchell ed, 1983)Greenberg M, Greenberg op cit page 226

R, Brown, “How constitutional Theory found its Soul: The Contributions of Ronald Dworkin in S, Hershovitz, “Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurispudence of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford University Press 2008) page 41

C, Eisgruber, “Should Constitutional Judges be Philosophers?” in S, Hershovitz op cit page 5

J, Gardner, “Law’s Aims in Law’s Empire” in S, Hershovitz op cit page 207

J, Waldron, “Did Dworkin Ever answer the crits?” in S, Hershovitz op cit page 162

H. L. A. Hart, ‘American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream’, Ga. L. RetJ. 968, 983 (l977).

Greenawalt. ·Policy, Rights and Judicial Decision’, II Ga. L. Ref). 991, 992 (1977).

Munzer, “Right Answers, Pre-existing Rights and Fairness” 11 Ga L Rev 1055, 1060 (1977)

Brilmayer, “The Institutional and Empircal Basis of the Rights Thesis” 11 Ga L Rev 1173, 1198-9 (1977)

Richards, ‘Rules, Policies and Neutral Principles: The Search for Legitimacy in Common Law and Constitutional Adjudication’, II Ga. L. Rev. 1069, 1095-6 (1977)

Professor Soper, “Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute’, 75 Mich. L. Rev. 473 (1977)

Lyons ‘Principles, positivism and Legal Theory – Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously’,87 Tale L.]. 415 (1977).

Nickel, ‘Dworkin on the Nature and Consequences of Rights’, [( Ga. L. Rep. 115, 1137 (1977).

L, Fuller, “The Morality of Law” (Yale University Press, 1969) page 145

Limitation Act 1980

Pye v Graham [2003] 1 AC 419

Buckinghamshire CC v Moran [1990] Ch 223

Clowes Developments v Waters [2005] EWHC 669 (Ch)

Hounslow LBC v Minchinton [1997] 74 P & CR 221

Rains v Buxton [1880] 14 Chd 537

Smith v Lloyd [1854] 9 Exch 564

Lambeth v Blackburn [2001] EWCA Civ 912,

Purbrick v Hackney [2004] 1 P & CR 553

Red house farms v Catchpole [1977] 2 EGLR 125

Powell v Macfarlane [1970] 38 P & CR 452

Treloar v Nute [1976] 1 WLR 1295

Wallis’s Cayton Holiday Camp v Shell-Mex BP [1975] QB 94

Techbild v Chamberlain [1969] 20 P & CR 633

Leigh v Jack [1879] 5 Ex D 264

Buckinghamshire CC v Moran [1990] Ch 223

Re Riley and the Real property Act [1965] NSWR 994

Lord Advocate v Lord Lovat [1880] 5 App Cas 273

Cooke v Dunn (1998) 9 BPR

iSmith v Lawson (1998) 75 P & CR 466

Warren v Murray [1894] 2 QB 648.

Ramnarace v Lutchman [2001]1 WLR 1651

Canadian Pacific ltd v Paul (1989) 53 DLR (4th),

Thomas v Thomas (1855) 2 K & J 79 r

Keefer v Arillotta (1977) 72 DLR

Williams v Usherwood (1983) 45 P & CR 235

Public Trustee v Bellotti (1986) 4 BPR 9196 at 9201

Clarke v Swaby [2007] 2 P & CR 1

Colchester BC v Smith [1991] Ch 448 at 4891

Sandhu v Farooqui [2004]1 P & CR 19 at L

Parker v Parker [2003] EWHC 1846 Ch.

Nicholson v England [1962] 2 KB 93.

Land Registration Act 2002

Colchester Borough Council v Smith [1992] 2 WLR 722

Beaulane Properties v Plamer [2005] 4 All ER 461

Human Rights Act 1998.

JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom [2007] All ER 177

Land Registration Act 1925

Ofulue and another v Bossert [2008] EWCA Civ 7.

Connor V UK [2004] 40 EHRR 189

Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57

Leeds City Council v Price [2006] UKHL 10.

Lambeth LBC v Blackburn (200l) 82 P & CR 494

Ellis v Lambeth LBC (1999) The Times 28 September 1999.

Law Commission in the report “ land registration for the 21st-century: a Conveyancing Revolution, Law Com. 271 (2001)

K, Gray and S, Gray, “Elements of Land Law” (5th Edition, Oxford University Press) page 1170

E, Cooke ‘Adverse possession-problems of title in registered land’, (1994) , 14 LS 1.

J, Mackenzie, and M, Phillips, “Textbook on Land Law”, 9th edn, Oxford University Press, 2002, chapter 6.

A, Oakley, “Megarry’s Manual of the Law of Real Property”, 8th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2002, chapter 14.

H. W. R Wade,., ‘Landlord, Tenant and Squatter’, (1962) 78 LQR 541

Family Law Reform Act 1969,

Re E (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1993] 1 FLR 386

Re R (A Minor) Wardship: Consent to Treatment [1992] Fam 11 CA

Re W (A Minor) (Medical Treatment: Court’s Jurisdiction [1993] Fam 64 CA. My

E, Jackson, “Medical Law: Text, Case and Materials” (Oxford University Press) page 237

R (A Minor) Wardship: Consent to Treatment [1992] Fam 11 CA

Re E (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1993] 1 FLR 386

R (A Minor) Wardship: Consent to Treatment [1992] Fam 11 C

C, Bridge, “Religious Beliefs and Teenage Refusal of Medical Treatment” (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 585,

A, Grubb, “Commentary on Re L (Medical Treatment: Gillick Competency) (1999) 7 Medical Law Review 58-61

I, Kennedy, “Consent to Treatment: The Capable Person” in C Dyer (ed) “Doctors, Patients and the Law (Blackwell, Oxford 1992) page 44

N, Lowe and S, Juss, “Medical treatment – Pragmatism and the Search for Principle” (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 865.
Textbooks

Moffat, Bean and Dewar, Trusts Law: Texts and Materials (2005) CUP: Cambridge

Oakley, Trends in Contemporary Trust Law (1996) OUP: Oxford

Articles

Hand, A new legal basis for occupational pension schemes (1993) ICCLR 101

Hand, Does the Goode Report pierce the veil of UK pension regulations? (1993) JIBL 445

Hayton, Trust Law and occupational pension schemes (1993) Conv 283

Hilliard, Limiting Re Hastings-Bass? [2004] Conv 208

House of Commons, The operation of Pension Funds (1991-1992) Social Security Committee, 2nd report, March

Milner, Pension trusts: a new trust form? (1997) Conv 89

Cases

AG v Blake [2001] 1 AC 268

Armitage v Nurse (1998)

Beswick v Beswick [1968] AC 58

Cooperative Insurance v Argyll Stores [1998] AC 1

Cowan v Scargill [1985] Ch 270

Fletcher v Fletcher (1844) 4 Hare 67

Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461

Learoyd v Whiteley (1886) 33 Ch D 347

McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424

Phipps v. Boardman [1967] 2 AC 46

Pullan v Koe [1913] 1 Ch 9

Re Hallett’s Estate (1879) 13 Ch D 696

Re Hasting’s Bass[1975] Ch 25

Re Johnson (1880) 15 Ch D 548

Royal British Bank v Turquand (1856) 6 E&B 327

Target Holdings v Redferns 1996] 1 AC 421

Woodfall, Landlord and Tenants, Release 36 (1994), vol. 1, pp. 13/83, para. 13.131:

Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328 at p 335 (Excehquer Chamber)

R, Smith, “Property Law” (Longman, 2006) pages 81 -84)

Saskia Arthur “Fighting Over Fixtures and Fittings” http://www.coutts.com/woman/2009/may/money-matters/Fighting-over-fixtures-and-fittings.asp

Leigh v Taylor [1902] AC 157

Berkley v Poulett [1977] 1 EGLR 86

Elitestone Ltd v Morris [1997] 1 WLR 687.

Reid v. Smith [1905] 3 C.L.R. 656, 659

Botham v TSB Bank plc (1996) 73 P & C

Spyer v Phillipson [1931] 2 Ch 183,

Thomas v Sorrell (1673) Vaught 330,

Wood v Leadbitter (1845) 13 M & W 838

Hardwick v Johnson [1978] 1 WLR 683.

Geoffrey Samuel in his book “Law of Obligations and Legal remedies” (Second Edition, Cavendish Press) page 153

Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Company Ltd [1957] 3 QB 334

Bernstein v Skyviews & General Ltd [1978] QB 479

T, Weir, “A Casebook on Tort” (Thomson, Sweet and Maxwell, 10th Edition) page 361

Anchor Brewhouse Development v Berkley House (Dockland Developments [1987] 2 EGLR Ch
Halsbury’s Law ,
Westlaw
Bailii.org
Lawtel
Hill v Tupper (1863) 2 H&C 121 (159 ER 51)
Sparkes (1993) 109 Law Quarterly Review 93
J, Steele, “Tort Law: Text, Cases and Materials” (Oxford University Press, 2007) and
T, Weir, “A Casebook on Tort” (Thomson, Sweet and Maxwell, 10th Edition 2004)
Robson v Hallett [1967] 2 QB 939
Hurst v Picture Theatres Ltd [1915] 1 KB 1
Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571
Chandler v Kerley [1978] 1 WLR 693
Opsi.gov.uk
Westlaw
Lawtel
Bailii.org
R, Smith, “Property Law” Longman 2006 page 277 – 278.
Coke, “Commentaries on the Laws of England” Vol ii Chapter 12
Wright v Gibbons (1949) 78 CLR 313
Doe d Aslin v Summersett (1830) 1 B&Ad 135 (109 ER 738),
Goodman v Gallant [1986] Fam 106, Wiscot’s Case [1599] 2 Co Rep 60b (76 ER 555)
Megarry and Wade, “The Law of Real Property (6th Edition)
Jacobs v Seward [1872] LR 5 HL 464.
Smith v Baker [1970] 1 WLR 1160
Re Cummins [1972] Ch 62
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429
Chandler v Clark [2003] 1 P&CR 239
Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886
Oxley v Hiscock [2005] Fam 211. R, Smith page 289.
Westdeutche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1996] AC 669
Midland Bank v Cooke [1995] 4 All ER 562
R, Pearce and J, Stevens, “The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations” (Oxford University Press, 2006) page 234 -235 Resulting Trusts
The Venture [1908] 218
Abrahams v Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abrahams [1999] BPIR 637
Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777
Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340
Cowcher v Cowcher [1972] 1 WLR 425.
Curley v Parkes [2004]

 Judge Mahon & Ors -v- Lawlor & Ors [2008] IEHC 284 (30 July 2008) (View without highlighting) [100%]
([2008] IEHC 284; From High Court of Ireland Decisions; 45 KB)
 Brangam, Re Judicial Review [2008] NIQB 92 (10 September 2008) (View without highlighting) [100%]
([2008] NIQB 92; From High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland Queen’s Bench Division Decisions; 31 KB)
 McDonald-Grant v Sutherland & Company [2008] ScotCS CSOH_150 (29 October 2008) (View without highlighting) [100%]
([2008] ScotCS CSOH_150; From Scottish Court of Session Decisions; 724 KB)
 Chief Adjudication Officer v. Palfrey and Others [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_391_1992 (08 February 1995) (View without highlighting) [100%]
([1995] UKSSCSC CIS_391_1992; From UK Social Security and Child Support Commissioners’ Decisions; 225 KB)
 Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk [1991] UKHL 6 (05 December 1991) (View without highlighting) [88%]
([1990] 3 WLR 1144, [1991] UKHL 6, [1992] 1 AC 478, [1992] 1 All ER 1; From United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions; 65 KB)
 Bathurst v Scarborow [2004] EWCA Civ 411 (01 April 2004) (View without highlighting) [83%]
([2004] EWCA Civ 411; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 63 KB)
 Burton v. Mayor etc of The London Borough of Camden [2000] UKHL 8; [2000] 2 AC 399; [2000] 1 All ER 943; [2000] 2 WLR 427 (17th February, 2000) (View without highlighting) [80%]
((2000) 32 HLR 625, (2000) 79 P & CR D38, [2000] 1 All ER 943, [2000] 1 EGLR 49, [2000] 1 FCR 481, [2000] 14 EG 149, [2000] 2 AC 399, [2000] 2 WLR 427, [2000] BLGR 289, [2000] EG 23, [2000] L & TR 235, [2000] NPC 16, [2000] UKHL 8; From United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions; 36 KB)
 Goodman v Gallant [1985] EWCA Civ 15 (30 October 1985) (View without highlighting) [75%]
([1985] EWCA Civ 15, [1986] 1 FLR 513, [1986] 2 WLR 236, [1986] Fam 106; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 41 KB)
 Marshall v Marshall [1998] EWCA Civ 1467 (02 October 1998) (View without highlighting) [72%]
([1998] EWCA Civ 1467; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 25 KB)
 Murphy (a child) v Holland & Ors [2003] EWCA Civ 1862 (19 December 2003) (View without highlighting) [62%]
([2003] EWCA Civ 1862; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 52 KB)
 Brangam, Re Judicial Review [2008] NIQB 11 (1 February 2008) (View without highlighting) [53%]
([2008] NIQB 11; From High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland Queen’s Bench Division Decisions; 22 KB)
 Carr-Glynn v Frearsons (A Firm) [1998] EWCA Civ 1325 (29 July 1998) (View without highlighting) [52%]
([1998] 4 All ER 225, [1998] EWCA Civ 1325; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 44 KB)
 Official Receiver for NI v. Kearney [1999] NICh 2; [1999] NIJB 24 (13th January, 1999) (View without highlighting) [46%]
([1999] NICh 2, [1999] NIJB 24; From High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland Chancery Division Decisions; 19 KB)
 Brown v Brown & Anor [2007] EWHC 405 (Ch) (01 March 2007) (View without highlighting) [39%]
([2007] EWHC 405 (Ch), [2008] 2 WLR 283; From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 53 KB)
 Matthews v Hunter & Robertson Ltd [2008] ScotCS CSOH_88 (11 June 2008) (View without highlighting) [36%]
([2008] ScotCS CSOH_88; From Scottish Court of Session Decisions; 107 KB)
 White v White [2001] EWCA Civ 955 (21 June 2001) (View without highlighting) [34%]
([2001] EWCA Civ 955; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 41 KB)
 Stack v. Dowden (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 17 (25 April 2007) (View without highlighting) [34%]
((2006-07) 9 ITELR 815, [2007] 1 FLR 1858, [2007] 18 EG 153, [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 All ER 929, [2007] 2 FCR 280, [2007] 2 WLR 831, [2007] BPIR 913, [2007] Fam Law 593, [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] WTLR 1053; From United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions; 158 KB)
 Williams v Hensman [1861] EWHC Ch J51 (10 June 1861) (View without highlighting) [33%]
([1861] EWHC Ch J51; From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 30 KB)
 Dingmar v Dingmar Rev 1 [2006] EWCA Civ 942 (12 July 2006) (View without highlighting) [30%]
([2006] 3 WLR 1183, [2006] EWCA Civ 942, [2007] 2 All ER 382; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 89 KB)
 Wallbank & Anor v Price [2007] EWHC 3001 (Ch) (28 November 2007) (View without highlighting) [30%]
([2007] EWHC 3001 (Ch); From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 72 KB)
 Campbell v Diamond [2008] NICh 10 (06 May 2008) (View without highlighting) [30%]
([2008] NICh 10; From High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland Chancery Division Decisions; 7 KB)
 Demptford v. Simpson [2007] ScotSC 32 (02 July 2007) (View without highlighting) [27%]
([2007] ScotSC 32; From Scottish Sheriff Court Decisions; 57 KB)
 Pudner & Anor v Pudner [2006] EWCA Civ 250 (27 February 2006) (View without highlighting) [25%]
([2006] EWCA Civ 250; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 18 KB)
 Osoba v Osoba & Ors [1978] EWCA Civ 3 (31 October 1978) (View without highlighting) [21%]
([1978] EWCA Civ 3, [1979] 1 WLR 247, [1979] 2 All ER 393; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 40 KB)
 Williams & Anor v Malewska & Ors [1999] EWCA Civ 1954 (23 July 1999) (View without highlighting) [19%]
([1999] EWCA Civ 1954; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 24 KB)
 Wills v. Wills (Jamaica) [2003] UKPC 84 (01 December 2003) (View without highlighting) [19%]
([2003] UKPC 84, [2004] 1 P & CR 37; From Privy Council Decisions; 41 KB)
 Fairclough v Salmon [2006] EWCA Civ 320 (28 February 2006) (View without highlighting) [18%]
([2006] EWCA Civ 320; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 35 KB)
 Stack v Dowden [2005] EWCA Civ 857 (13 July 2005) (View without highlighting) [17%]
([2005] EWCA Civ 857; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 91 KB)
 Fitzhugh Gates (a firm) v Claudia Louise Elaine Borden Sherman [2003] EWCA Civ 886 (01 July 2003) (View without highlighting) [16%]
([2003] EWCA Civ 886; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 71 KB)
 Grimm v. Newman & Anor [2001] EWHC Ch 454 (1st November, 2001) (View without highlighting) [15%]
([2001] EWHC Ch 454; From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 115 KB)
 King, Re [1963] EWCA Civ 1 (04 February 1963) (View without highlighting) [14%]
([1963] 1 All ER 781, [1963] 2 WLR 629, [1963] Ch 459, [1963] EWCA Civ 1, [1963] RVR 245; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 70 KB)
 Clarke v Harlowe [2005] EWHC 3062 (Ch) (12 August 2005) (View without highlighting) [13%]
([2005] EWHC 3062 (Ch), [2005] WTLR 1473, [2006] BPIR 636, [2006] Fam Law 846, [2007] 1 FLR 1, [2007] 3 FCR 726; From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 31 KB)
 Clarke v Harlowe [2005] EWHC B20 (Ch) (12 August 2005) (View without highlighting) [13%]
([2005] EWHC B20 (Ch); From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 30 KB)
 Irwin v Deasy [2006] IEHC 25 (31 January 2006) (View without highlighting) [13%]
([2006] 2 ILRM 226, [2006] IEHC 25; From High Court of Ireland Decisions; 47 KB)
 P & Ors, Re (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 38 (18 June 2008) (View without highlighting) [13%]
(24 BHRC 650, [2008] 2 FCR 366, [2008] 2 FLR 1084, [2008] 3 WLR 76, [2008] Fam Law 977, [2008] HRLR 37, [2008] NI 310, [2008] UKHL 38, [2008] UKHRR 1181, [2009] 1 AC 173; From United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions; 167 KB)
 PHILIP JOSEPH HINES v. MAUREEN DAPHNE WILLANS [1997] EWCA Civ 1135 (28th February, 1997) (View without highlighting) [12%]
([1997] EWCA Civ 1135; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 27 KB)
 Chandler v Clark [2002] EWCA Civ 1249 (28 June 2002) (View without highlighting) [12%]
([2002] EWCA Civ 1249; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 23 KB)
 Sheehy -v- Talbot [2008] IEHC 207 (03 July 2008) (View without highlighting) [12%]
([2008] IEHC 207; From High Court of Ireland Decisions; 67 KB)
 Bernard v Joseph [1982] EWCA Civ 2 (30 March 1982) (View without highlighting) [11%]
([1982] 2 WLR 1052, [1982] Ch 391, [1982] EWCA Civ 2; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 57 KB)
 Crossley v Crossley [2005] EWCA Civ 1581 (21 December 2005) (View without highlighting) [11%]
([2005] EWCA Civ 1581; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 36 KB)
 Harris (t/a Fellows Sandwich Bar) & Anor (t/a Fellows Bistro) v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20235 (03 July 2007) (View without highlighting) [11%]
([2007] UKVAT V20235; From United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions; 24 KB)
 Grimm v Newman Chantry Vellacott Dfk [2002] EWCA Civ 1621 (07 November 2002) (View without highlighting) [9%]
([2002] EWCA Civ 1621, [2002] STC 1388, [2003] 1 All ER 67; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 104 KB)
 Hunt v Soady [2007] EWCA Civ 366 (26 April 2007) (View without highlighting) [9%]
([2007] EWCA Civ 366; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 25 KB)
 Lewis & Anor v Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd [2008] EWHC 2760 (Ch) (21 November 2008) (View without highlighting) [9%]
([2008] 47 EG 113 (CS), [2008] EWHC 2760 (Ch), [2008] NPC 128, [2009] 1 FLR 631, [2009] 9 EG 198, [2009] BPIR 79, [2009] Fam Law 102; From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 32 KB)
 Uppal v Uppal & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 411 (26 March 2007) (View without highlighting) [8%]
([2007] EWCA Civ 411; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 28 KB)
 Chan Pui Chun v Leung Kam Ho & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1075 (29 July 2002) (View without highlighting) [7%]
([2002] EWCA Civ 1075, [2003] 1 FCR 520, [2003] 1 FLR 23, [2003] BPIR 29; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 83 KB)
 Ashborder BV & Ors v Green Gas Power Ltd. & Ors [2004] EWHC 1517 (Ch) (29 June 2004) (View without highlighting) [7%]
([2004] EWHC 1517 (Ch); From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 253 KB)
 Dunbar v Plant [1997] EWCA Civ 2167 (23rd July, 1997) (View without highlighting) [6%]
([1997] 3 FCR 669, [1997] 3 WLR 1261, [1997] 4 All ER 289, [1997] EWCA Civ 2167, [1998] 1 FLR 157, [1998] Ch 412, [1998] Fam Law 139; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 89 KB)
 Parochial Church Council Of Parish Of Darby Green & Anor v Waldner & Ors [1998] EWCA Civ 1299 (27 July 1998) (View without highlighting) [6%]
([1998] EWCA Civ 1299; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 15 KB)
 Bryan v Shoultz [1999] EWCA Civ 1220 (21 April 1999) (View without highlighting) [6%]
([1999] EWCA Civ 1220; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 33 KB)
 Duppa v Mayo [1669] EWHC KB J97 (11 January 1669) (View without highlighting) [6%]
((1669) 1 Wms Saund 275, 85 ER 336, [1669] EWHC KB J97; From England and Wales High Court (King’s Bench Division) Decisions; 241 KB)
 Treacy -v- Roche & Anor [2009] IEHC 103 (27 February 2009) (View without highlighting) [6%]
([2009] IEHC 103; From High Court of Ireland Decisions; 37 KB)
 Basch v Stekel & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 3033 (25 July 2000) (View without highlighting) [5%]
([2000] EWCA Civ 3033, [2001] L & TR 1 (2001) 81 P & CR DG1; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 39 KB)
 Wagstaff v Colls [2003] EWCA Civ 469 (02 April 2003) (View without highlighting) [5%]
([2003] 4 Costs LR 535, [2003] CP Rep 50, [2003] EWCA Civ 469, [2003] PNLR 29; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 79 KB)
 Mack v Lockwood & Ors [2009] EWHC 1524 (Ch) (19 June 2009) (View without highlighting) [5%]
([2009] EWHC 1524 (Ch); From England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions; 76 KB)
 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] UKHL 12 (22 May 1996) (View without highlighting) [5%]
([1996] 2 All ER 961, [1996] 2 WLR 802, [1996] 5 Bank LR 341, [1996] AC 669, [1996] UKHL 12; From United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions; 318 KB)
 Walker v. Lundborg (The Bahamas) [2008] UKPC 17 (6 March 2008) (View without highlighting) [5%]
([2008] UKPC 17; From Privy Council Decisions; 72 KB)
 Walker v Geo H Medlicott & Son (A Firm) [1998] EWCA Civ 1806 (19 November 1998) (View without highlighting) [4%]
([1998] EWCA Civ 1806, [1999] 1 WLR 727; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 65 KB)
 Waldner v Parochial Church Council Of Darby Green & Anor [1999] EWCA Civ 1605 (17 June 1999) (View without highlighting) [4%]
([1999] EWCA Civ 1605; From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions; 9 KB)
 Corbett v Bond Pearce (A Firm) [2001] EWCA Civ 531 (11 April 2001) (View without highlighting) [4%]
http://www.desktoplawyer.co.uk/dt/browse/law/index.cfm?fuseaction=ViewContent&sid=75956&aid=34916

South Africa Act 1909

The North America Act 1867

Constitution Act 1867)

Canada Act 1982 Act

L ’Estrange v E Graucob Ltd [1934] KB 394

Reference re Amendment of the Constitution of Canada (1982) 125 DLR (3d)

British North America Act 1867

The Statute of Westminster 1931

Shore v Wilson (1842) 9 CI & Fin 355

Marquis Cholmondeley v Lord Clinton (I 820) 2 Jac & w

R, Goode, “ Commercial Law” (Third Edition, Penguin Books 2004)

Misrepresentation Act 1967

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

T, Downes, “Contract Law” (5th Edition, Blackstone Press Limited)

Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] QB 752

Manuel v Attorney General [1983] Ch 77
A V Dicey “Introduction to the, Study of the Law of the Constitution”, (10th edn, 1959), London: Macmillan, Chapter 14)

H, Barnett, “Constitutional and Administrative Law” (Third Edition, Cavendish Publishing) page 31

T, Downes, “Contract Law” (5th Edition, Blackstone Press Limited) Page 91.

A, Atiyah, “An introduction to the law of contract” (Clarendon Press Oxford, Third edition) Page 265

Surrey County Council v Bredero Home’ Ltd (1993) 1 WLR 1361 (CA)

Attorney-General v Blake [2000] 3 WLR 625 (HL)

Thompson (W.L.) Ltd v Robinson (Gunmakers) Ltd [1955] Ch 177

Magna Carta 1215

The Petition of Right 1628

Darnel’s Case (the Five Knights case (1627) 3 St Tr 1

The Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1689

Meeting of Parliament Act 1694

The Act of Settlement 1700

The Treaty of Union 1706

J,Poole. “ Casebook on Contract Law” (Fifth Edition Blackstone Press)

I, Jennings (Sir), Cabinet Government, 3rd edn, 1959, Cambridge: CUP, p 2.

G, Slapper and D, Kelly, “The English Legal System” (Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 4th Edition) page 29

Reiter and Swan, ‘Contracts and the protection of reasonable expectation” Studies in Contract Law (Toronto: Butterworths, 1980), 1-23)

Victorian Railway Commissioners v Coulthas [1888] 13 App Cas 222

Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669

Chadwick v British Transport Commission [1967] 2 All E R.945

McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983] 1 AC 410, 429-430

Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1991] 4 All ER 907

McFarlane v EE Caledonia Ltd [1994] 2 All ER 1

Brice v Brown [1984] 1 All ER

Re The Herald of Free Enterprise [1989]

Nicholls v Rushton [1992] Times

Attia v British Gas [1988] QB 304 White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire

Police [1999] 2 AC 455

Hunter v British Coal Corp [1998].

Duncan v British Coal Corp [1999] ICR 72 CA

Caparo Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605

T, Weir, “A casebook on Tort”(10th Edition, Sweet & Maxwell 2004)

E, McKendrick,‘Vicarious Liability and Independent Contractors-A Re-examination’ (1980) 53 MLR 770,

K. M,Stanton, ‘New Forms of the Tort of Breach of Statutory Duty’ (2004) 120 LQR 324

M, Jones, “Textbook on Torts” (7th Edition, Blackstone Press Limited) page 379

Y. B. Smith (1923) 23 Col. L Rev 444, 461;

G. Williams, Liability for Independent Contractors’ . (l956) eLJ 180, 196

H, Collins, ‘Ascription of legal responsibility of Economic Integration’ (I 990) 53 MLR 731-84.

G. Williams and B. Hepple, Foundations of the law of Tort (1976), 112-15.

Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell [1965] AC 656

M, Atiyah, Vicarious Liability (Butterworths, 1967), 15-27

Viasystems v Thermal Transfer [2006] 2 WLR 428

Bazley v Curry [1999] 2 : 534 at 55l,

Jacobi v Griffiths [1999] 2 SCR 570 at 593

S. Waddarns, Dimensions of Private law (CUP, 2003),192, .

Lister v Hesley Hall [2001] UKHL 22

M, Atiyah, “Accidents, Compensation and the Law, 6th ed (1999), p85,

G, Williams, “Vicarious Liability and the Master’s Indemnity” (1957) 20 MLR 220,

Fleming, “The Law of Torts”, 9th edition, p 41

J, Steele, “Tort Law: Text, Cases and Materials” (Oxford University Press, 2007) Page 564

G. Williams, ‘Vicarious Liability: Tort of the Master or Tort of the Servant?’ (1956) 72LQR522.

Dubai Aluminium v Salaam [2003] 2 AC 366

Majrowskj v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34

J, Salmond, “Torts” (1st Edition, 1907) page 83
Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co [1912] AC 716

D Rose, “liability for an Employee’s Assaults” (1977) 40 MLR 420, 432-433.

I, Smith and G, Thomas, “Smith & Woods: Employment Law” (Oxford University Press) page 163

Sex Discrimination Act 1975

P, Wallington, “Butterworths Employment Law Handbook” (2009, 17th Edition)

J, Bowers et al, “Blackstones: Employment Law Practice 2009”, (Oxford University press) page 502

Jacobi v Griffiths [1999] 2 SCR 570

T, Weir, “A Casebook on Tort” (Tenth Edition, Sweet & Maxwell) Page 288

NSW v Lepore [2003] HCA 4.

N, McBride,‘Vicarious Liability in England and Australia’ (2003) 62 eLl 255.

J, Levinson, ‘Vicarious Liability for Intentional Torts’ [2005] ]PI 304.

Dubai Aluminium v Salaam [2003] 2 AC 366

Mattis v Pollock [2003] 1 WLR 2158

Bernard v AG Jamaica UKPC 47

Brown v Robinson [2004] UKPC

P,Gilliker ‘Rough Justice in an Unjust World’ (2002) 65 MLR 269.

R, Weekes, ‘Vicarious Liability for Violent Employees’ (2004) 63 eLl 53.

British Transport Commission v Gourley [1955] UKHL 4

Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605

Consistent Group v Kalwak [2007] IRLR 560

Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank [2006] UKHL 28

General Engineering v Kingston [1988] 3 All ER 867

Harrison v Michelin Tyre [1985] 1 All ER 918

Honeywell v Larkin [1933] All ER 77

Livingstone v Raywards (1880) 5 App Cas 25

Lister v Hesley Hall [2001] UKHL 22

Market Investigations v Minister of Social Security [1969] 2 QB 173

Rose v Plenty [1975] 1 WLR 141

Salsbury v Woodland [1970] 1 QB 324

Smith v Stages [1989] AC 928

Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] 1 AC 617

Wheat v Lacon [1966] 1 All ER 582

Birch v Treasury Solicitor [1951] Ch 298

Bromley v Tryon [1952] A.C. 265

Family Law Reform Act 1969

Cain v Moon [1896] 2 QB 283

Oakley, A J, “Parkers and Mellows: The Modern Law of Trusts”, Sweet & Maxwell

Comiskey v Bowring-Hanbury [1905] A.C. 84

Gartside v IRC [1968] AC 553 at 617

Knight v Knight (1840) 3 Beav

Mcphail v Doulton [1971] 1 AC 424

Morice v Bishop of Durham (1804) 9 Ves 399 at 405

Milroy v Lord (1862) 4 De GF & J 264

Palmer v Simmonds (1854) 2 Drew 221

Re Beaumont [1902] 1 Ch 889

Re Craven’s Estate [1937] CH

Re Adams & Kensington Vestry (1884) 27 ChD 394

Re Barlow’s Will Trusts [1979] 1 WLR 278 at 282C-F

Re Gestener’s Settlement [1953] Ch 672

Re Gulbenkian’s Settlement [1970] AC 508 at 523.

Re Hamilton [1895] 2 Ch. 360

Re Leaper [1916] 1 Ch 579

Saunier v Anderson (1987) 43 DLR (4th) 19

Sen v Headley [1991] CH 425

Re Mustapha (1891) 8 TLR 160

Sprange v Barnard (1789) 2 Bro.C.C 585

T. Choithram International SA v Pagarani [2001] 1 WLR 1

Wills Act 1837


Book a privately funded Public AccessCriminal Law Barrister Online (non-legal aid)

January 6, 2012
Leave a Comment

Sources

HM Government, “Reducing Re-Offending Through Skill and Employment” CM 6702 http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/offenderlearning/uploads/…/green_paper_reducing_re-offending_through_skills_%20and_employment_final_version … Accessed 23 March 2009 page 10.
Youth Justice Board 2005 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/Risk%20Factors%20Summary%20fv.pdf – Accessed 23 March 2009
Sachs Performance Data, Youth Justice Board (Internal Publication), 2005
C, Holmes, “New Homelessness Act Offers Opportunity to change young lives” Youth Justice Board News April 2003
Criminal Justice Act, 2003
Offender Management Case load Statistics 2003, Home Office 2004;
Niven and Glagundoye, Jobs and Homes, 2002
Hurry et al, 2005, Rapid Evidence Assessment of Interventions that Promote Employment for Offenders (Institute of Education report – forthcoming);Through the Prison Gate, Home Office, 2001
Singleton et al 1998; Psychiatric Morbidity Among Prisoners in England and Wales, 1998
Permanent . Exclusions from Maintained Schools in England (2002/03) DFES; population in Custody October 2005, Home Office, 2005.
Home Office, “Basic Skills Training for Prisoners” report 2004
Youth Justice Board, ”Public to take part in Pilots for Youth Crime Prevention”, Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf accessed 23 March 2009
Youth Justice Board “Home Office drugs stategy: wide implications for youth justice”, Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf accessed 23 March 2009
Youth Justice Board “A Home from Home”, Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf accessed 23 March 2009
Youth Justice Board “Last year’s Splash programmes evaluated”, Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf accessed 23 March 2009
Youth Justice Board “Restorative Justice in Schools extended”, Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf accessed 23 March 2009
Youth Justice Board “Shoplifting video shows impact on victims” Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf accessed 23 March 2009
Youth Justice Board “Reversing the trend and breaking the links“ Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf Accessed 23 March 2009
N,Warner, “Juvenile Reoffending significantly reduced” Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf Accessed 23 March
Youth Justice Board, “ Youth Justice Board News, “Reoffending on the decrease: reversing the trend and breaking the links” Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf Accessed 23 March
Prison Reform Trust,, “Electric Monitoring Milestone 100,000 offenders tagged”http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk!subsection.asp?id=41S date accessed 23 March 2009
Home Office, “Home Office Statistical Bulletin, Re-offending of juveniles: results from the 2004 cohort” June 2006 page 1. http://www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/workingoffenders/workingoffenders68.htm accessed 23 March 2009.
D, Hosmer, And S, Lemeshow, “Applied Logistic Regression” ((2000, 2nd Ed). John Wiley & Sons: New York) page 147
C, Wright, “Good Performance gets the green light” Youth Justice Board News April 2003 http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Resources/Downloads/YJBNewsIssue17.pdf Accessed 23 March
C, May, “Explaining reconviction following a community sentence: the role of social factors.” Home Office Research Study 192. London: (1999) Home Office


Book Public Access Breach of Contract Barrister online

January 6, 2012
Leave a Comment

Sources

P, Atiyah, “An Introduction to the law of contract” Oxford University Press page 128

D, French et al, “Mayson, French and Ryan: Company Law” (25th Edition, Oxford University Press) page 213

Koenigsblatt v Sweet [1923] 2 Ch 314

Herbert Smith, Finance and Corporate briefing May 2009 http://www.herbertsmith.com/NR/rdonlyres/DD3671FB-E964-4D90-AEB8-227116ED8265/0/7445JointfinandcorpbriefingreMercuryd5.pdf

Tax Group Limited v HMRC [2008] EWHC 2721

Pigot’s case [1614] 11 Co Rep 266

R, Stone, “Principles of Contract Law” Fourth Edition, Cavendish publishing page 125

Corpe v Overton [1833] 10 Bing 252

North Western Rail Co v Mc Micheal [1850] 5 EX 114

N Mehta v J Pereira Fernandes S.A [2006] EWHC 813 (Ch)

Orton v Collins [2007] 1WLR 2953

Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG v Crossseas Shipping Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 1135

Morrell v Studd & Millington [1913] 2 Ch 648

Goss v Lord nugent [1833] 5 B & Ad 58

Bank of Australasia v Palmer [1897] AC 540.

R, Stone, “Principles of Contract Law” Cavendish Publishing page 140

Premm v Simmonds [1917] 3 All ER 237

The Karen Oltmann [1976] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 708

The Antaios [1985] AC 91

City and Westminster Properties (1934) v Mudd [1959] Ch 129

K, Wedderburn, “Collateral Contracts” [1959] CLJ 5

Corbin, “The Parol Evidence Rule” 53 Yale LJ 603

R, Pearce and J, Stevens, “The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations” (Oxford University Press) 24 – 31

J, Poole, “Casebook on Contract Law” Blackstone press page141

Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130

Tool Metal Manufacturing CO Ltd v Tungsten Electric Co Ltd [1955] 1 WLR 761.

http://www.collyerbristow.com/FileServer.aspx?oID=1360&lID=0 Jane Hughes and Amy Bradbury Collyer Bristow LLP

Paradine v Jane (1647) Aleyn 26

Fondor v Barron Knights Ltd [1966J 1 WLR 87

Marshall v Harland and Volff Ltd [1972]1 WLR 899

Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696

Hakki v United Yeast Co. Ltd [1982] 2 ER 446

Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740

Denny, Mott md Dickson v James Fraser [1944] AC 265

Herne Bay Steamboat Co v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683

Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696

R, Stone, “Principles of Contract Law” (Cavendish Publishing, Fourth Edition)

Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr [1918] AC 119.

The Moorcock, (1889) 14 PD 64; [1886 -90] All ER Rep 530.

Smith v Bank of Scotland [1997] SLT 1061

Barclays plc v O’Brien [1994] 1 AC

Clydesdale Bank plc v Black [2002] SC 555

Braithwaite v Bank of Scotland 1999 SLT 25,

Ahmed v Clydesdale Bank Plc 2001 SL T

J, Thomson, “Misplaced Concern?”, 1997 SLG 124

G, Gretton. “Sexually Transmitted Debt”. 1997 SLT (News) 195

R, Dunlop. “Smith v Bank of Scotland: Spouses. Caution and the Banks (1997) 42 JLS 446).

S, Dickson, “Good faith in contract, spousal guarantees and Smith v Bank of Scotland” Scottish Law Times 1998 page

R, Pearce and J, Stephens, “The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations” (Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition)

Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 4 All ER 449

M, Kaye, “Equity’s treatment of Sexually Transmitted Debt [1997] Feminist Legal Studies 35

L, Mcgregor, “The House of Lords “applies” O’Brien north of the border” (Edinburgh law Review, Case Comment 1998) page 1

S, Eden, “Case Comment: More Cautionary Tales” (Edinburgh Law Review, 2004) page 1 analyses


Book Public Access Company Law Barrister Online

January 6, 2012
Leave a Comment

CLR, Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Developing the Framework (URN 00/656)

Davidson, The Companies Act 2006: directors’ duties and promoting the company’s success (2007) 11 JIBFL 631

Hansard, HL, GC Day 3, Vol.678

Hicks, Directors’ liability for management errors (1994) 110 LQR 390

Hoult, Concern over plans to clarify directors’ duties (2004) LS Gaz, 2 Dec 8 (1)

Keay, The duty of directors to exercise independent judgment (2008) Comp Law 290

Robins, Director duties (1999) LS Gaz, 29 Sep 9 (2)

D, French et al, “Mayson, French & Ryan on Company Law” (Oxford University Press, 2008)

AMB Generali Holding AG v Manches [2005] EWCA Civ 1237

Braymist v Wise Finance Co Ltd [2002] 2 All ER 333

Bagot Pneumatic Tyre Co v Clipper Pneumatic Tyre Co [1902] 1 Ch 146

Criterion Properties plc v Stratford UK Properties LLC [2004] UKHL 24

Evans v Brunner, Mond & Co [1921] 1 Ch 359

Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480

Grant v Switch Railway (1888) 40 Chd 135.

Heinhuis v Blacksheep Charters Ltd (1987) 46 DLR (4th) 67

House of Fraser plc v ACGE Investment Ltd [1987] AC 387

Hopkins v T L Dallas Group Ltd 2004 EWHC 1379.

Kelner v Baxter (1886) LR 2 CP 174

Natal Land and Colonization Co Ltd v Pauline Colliery and Development Syndicate Ltd [1904] AC 120

Phonogram Ltd v Lane [1982] QB 938

Scottish Insurance Corporation Ltd v Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltd [1949] 1 All ER 1068

Re Chatterley – Whitfield Colleries Ltd [1948] 2 All ER 593

Re Patent
Ivory Manufacturing Co (1888) 38 ChD

Re Northumberland Avenue Hotel Co (1886) 33 CHD 16
Hellmuth, Obata and Kassbaum Inc v King (2000) LTL 25/10/2000

Re Empress Engineerings Co (1880) 16 ChD 125

Re Saltdean Estate Co Ltd [1968] 1 WLR 1844

Re Northern Engineering Industries plc [1994] 2 BCLC 704

Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation [1986] CH 246

Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Chatterley –Whitfield Colleries Ltd [1949] AC 512

Webb v Earle (1875) LR 20 Eq 556)

The Companies Act 2006:


Book Public Access Commercial / Chancery Law Barrister Online

January 6, 2012
Leave a Comment

Articles
Tang Hang Wu, ‘Confidence and the Constructive Trust’ (2003) 23 LS 135I
M. Conaglen ‘Thinking about proprietary remedies for breach of confidence’ (2008) IPQ 82
Millward et aI ‘Workplace industrial relations in transition’ (the ED/ESRC/PSI/ACAS Survey) (1992) ch 6. Cullyet al ‘The 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey: the First Findings’ (ESRC/ ACAS/PSI, 1998; URN 98/934).
K F K, “Repair, rejection & rescission: an uneasy solution” (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review” 536
Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia, Vol 20, para 862.
Law Commission, Simplifying Consumer Legislation: A response from the Law Commission to the DT/’s Consultative Document on Strategy (2004).
R Bradgate and C Twigg-Flesner, Blackstone’s Guide to Consumer Sales and Associated Guarantees (2003) pp 22 to 26.
M Thomson. “A Simple Case? – J & H Ritchie ltd v Lloyd ltd. 2007 SL T 377” 2
D Carr, “Repairs, Refusals and out in the Law Rejections” (2007] Cambridge Law Journal 498
Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 188 “Consumer Remedies for Faulty Goods, A Joint Consultation paper. Law com
F Reynolds, “Loss of the Right to Reject” (2003) 119 Law Quarterlv Review 544
K Mullan, “Satisfaction guaranteed or no deal” [1990] Journal of Business Law 231
R Bradgate and F White, “Rejection and Termination in Contracts for the Sale of Goods” in J Birds, R Bradgate and C Villers (ads), Termination of Contracts (1995)
S Atlyah, J N Adams and H MacQueen, The Sale of Goods (11th ed 2005) chapter 1. Bell, Commentaries on the Laws of Scot/and (5th ed 1826), Vol I, Book III, P 439.
L Miller, “The Common Frame of Reference and the feasibility of a common cortract law in Europe” [2007] Journal of Business Law 378.
G, Howells and S Weatherill, Consumer Protection Law (2nd ed 2005) p 201.
L, Conway, “Proposed Consumer Rights Directive” http://www,parilament.uk/commons/llb/research/brleflngs/snha-05097.pdf, hence the government’s Davidson Review, Final Report (November 2006) para 3.2 .
EU level draft directive 2008 COM (200B) 614/3: see http://ec.europa.eu/consum;/rights/cons_acquis_en.htm.
J J White and R S Summers, Uniform Commercial Code (2000) p 318.
BERR, “Consumer Law Review Call for Evidence (May 2008).
Rott, German Sales Law Two Years After the Implementation of Directive 1999/44/ECGerman Law Journal 5, 237 to 256, 20.
White, “The EC Directive on Certain Aspects of Consumer Sale and Associated Guarantees: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?” (2000) 7(1) CLP 3.
Office of Fair Trading, Consumer Detriment: Assessing the frequency and impact of consumer problems with goods and services (April 2008). http://www.oft.gov.uklshared_ oft/reports/consumer _protection/oft992.pdf
A Buck and N Balmer, Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice 2006
J. Hull, ‘Stealing Secrets: A Review of the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on Misuse of Trade Secrets’ (l998) 4 IPQ 422.
Law Commission. Legislating the Criminal Code: Misuse of Trade Secrets. Consultation Paper No. 150 (1997). Para . 3.1.
P, Hibberd, D, Merrifield and A. Taylor “Key factors in contractual relationships” (1990) RICS; London.
H, Cale and A, Dugdale, “Contracts between businessmen: planning and the use of contractual remedies”. (1975) British Journal of Law and Society, 2, 45-60.
MA, Al-Shawi, and A E Hope, “Expert systems and contractual disputes: extensions of time under JCT 80. (1989) Construction Management and Economics, 7(1), 65- I
S, Edwards, “Remedies for Breach of Contract: The Jimi Hendrix Experience” 39 Essex Street Chambers page 2

W C H Ervine, “The Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002” 2003 SLT (News) 67 at 69.
Law Com, “Remedies under the Human Rights Act in the Employment Context” paragraph 6
S, Cotton, “Remedies for breach of contract” http://ldpracticallaw.Com17-101-0603
W, Hughes, “Improving the relationship between construction law and construction management” http://www.personal.rdg.ac.ukI~kCShUWill~Ckv.html·
R,Lewis, (1982) Contracts between businessmen: reform of the law of firm offers and an empirical study of tendering practices in the building industry. British Journal of Law and Society, 9, 153-175
Dickens, Hart, Jones and Weeks ‘Re-employment of unfairly dismissed workers: he lost remedy’ (l981) 10 IL) 160
Williams and Lewis ‘The aftermath of tribunal reinstatement and re-engagement’DE Research PaperNo 2. (191\1),
Sale and Supply of Goods (1987) Law Com No 160; Scot Law Com no. 104
Department of Trade and Industry, A Trader’s Guide: The Law Relating to the Supply of Goods and Services (2005) p 13.
C Willett, M Morgan-Taylor and A Naidoo, “The Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations” [2004] Journal of Business Law 94 at 114 to 115.
Bradgate, “Remedying the Unfit Fitted Kitchen” (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 558. .
L. Bently and C. Mitchell, ‘Combining Money Awards for Patent Infringement: Spring Form Inc v. Toy Brokers Ltd’ [2003) Restitution Law Review 79
L, Bently, ‘Accounting of Profits Gained from Infringement of Copyright: When Will It End?’ [1990] EIPR 5, 7-8.

Books

Brearley and Bloch Employment Covenants and Confidential Information: Law, Practice and Technique (2nd edn. 1999).
R, Pearce and J, Stevens, “The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations” (Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2006) pages 32 -33
R, Stone, “Principles of Contract Law” (Cavendish Publishing, 2000, Fourth Edition) page 313
I, Smith & G, Thomas, “Smith & Woods Employment Law” (Oxford University Press, Ninth Edition, 2008) page 532 Harvey DI {2371}.
L, Bently and B, Sherman, “Intellectual Property Law” (Oxford University Press, Third Edition, 2009) page 1034
Chitty on Contracts (29th ed 2004) para 26-047.

Cases

Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980] 1 All ER 556
Wilson v Northampton and Banbury Junction Rly Co (1874) 9 Ch App 279
Cooperative Insurance v Argyll [1997] 3 All ER 297.
Wilson v Northampton and Banbury Junction Rly Co (1874) 9 Ch App 279
Falcke v Gray (1859) 4 Drew 651
Earne v Lisle (l749) Amb 75
Thorn v Public Works (1 863) 32 Beav 490
Behnke v Bede Shipping Co Ltd [1927J 1 KB 649
Phillips v Lamdin [1949J 2 KB 33
J & H Ritchie ltd v Lloyd ltd” 2007 JR 241 at 246.
Addis v Gramophone Co. Ltd [1909] AC 488
Smith and Grady v United Kingdom [2000] Application No 33985/96
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co [1894] AC 535
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper’s Garage (Stourport) Ltd [1968] AC 269
Faccenda Chicken ltd v Fowler [1986] ICR 297.
Home Counties Dairies Ltd v Skilton [1970] 1 All ER 1227,
Marion White Ltd v Francis [1972] 3 All ER 857,
Littlewoods Orgnisation Ltd v Harris [1978] 1 All ER 1026.  
Johnson & Bloy (Holdings) Ltd v Wolstenholme Rink plc [1987] IRLR 499
Warren v Mendy [1989] IRLR 210
Nothern Electrical Co. V. Percy & G. A. Harvey & Co. (London) [1957] RPC 207, 213-14. L,

Robb v Green [1895] 2 QB 315, 320
Thomas Marshall v Guinle [1979] 1 Ch 227.
Littlewoods Organisation v. Harris [1978J 1 All ER 1026
Herbert Morris v. Saxelby [1916] AC 688
Attwood v. Lamont [1920] 3 KB 571,
Dier’s Case (1414) 2 Hen. V 5, pI. 26,
Mitchel v. Reynolds (l7l1) 1 P. Wms. 181 wI1 I
Attorney-General v. Blake [2000] 3 WLR 625, 72
Commercial Plastics v Vincent [1964] 3 All ER 546
Douglas v Hello! [2001] 2 WLR 992.
Fellowes v Fisher [1976] QB 122
Lansing v Kerr [1991] 1 All ER 418
Ocular Sciences [1997] RPC 289, 410
Peter Pan v. Corsets Silhouette [1963] 3 All ER 402.  
Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v Harris [1978]1 All ER 1026 at 1033, CA
Douglas v Hello (No.8) [2004] EMLR (2) 13 (para. 17)
Games Workshop [1993] FSR 704,713-14
Dormeuil Freres v Peraglow [1990] RPC 449
General Tire v. Firestone [1976] RPC 197, 213
Vine v. TalkSport Ltd [2003] FSR (35) 619 (para. 106) (CA)
Ludlow v. Williams [2002] FSR 868, 8891
Gerber Garment Technology v. Leetra Systems [1997} RPC 443,486
Robinson v Harman (1848) 154 ER 363
Jarvis v Swan Tours ltd [1973] 1 QB 233
Bliss v SE Thames Regional Health Authority [1987] ICR 700
Hayes v James and Charles Dodd [1990] 2 All ER 815
Polkey v A.E. Dayton Services Ltd [1988] ICR 142
Surrey County Council v Bredero Homes [1993] 3 All ER 705
Murphy v Stone Wallwork (Charlton) Ltd [1969] 2 All ER 949 at 952, [1969] 1 WLR 1023, HL.
Galoo Ltd v Bright Grahame Murray (1995) 1 All ER 16
Beco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co. Ltd (1994 4 All ER 464
Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341
Yetton v Eastwood roy Ltd [1967]1 WLR 104
Banco de Portugal v Waterlow & Sons [1932] AC 452
Hoffberger v Ascot Bloodstock Bureau Ltd (1976) 120 S] 130
British Westinghouse v Underground Electric Railways Co. of London [1912] AC 673
Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch  Ch 770 
William Bros v ET Agius Ltd [1914] AC 510
Williams v Reynolds 1865) 6 B & S49S)
 Bence Graphics International Ltd v Fasson UK Ltd [1998] QB 87
Bacon I V Cooper (Metals) Ltd [1982]1 All FR 397)
Kwei Tek Chao v British Traders Ltd [1954] 2 QB 459
Jeancharrn Ltd v Barnet Football Club Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 58, [2003] 92 Con LR 26
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd v New Caras. Md Motor Co. Ltd [1915] AC 79
 Qualcast (Wolverhampton) Ltd v Ross [1979] IeR 386, [1979] IRLR 98, EAT.
Enessy Co SA v Minoprio [1978] IRLR 489,
Adda International Ltd v Curcio [1976] feR 407, [1976] IRLR 425
Lifeguard Assurance ltd v Zadrozny 1977] IRLR 56
Smith, Kline and French Laboratories Ltd v Coates [1977] IRLR 220
Brownson v Hire Service Shops Ltd [1978] ICR 517, 
Young’s of Gosport Ltd v Kendell [1977] ICR 907, [1977] IRLR4,
Daley A E Dorsett (Almar) Dolls) Ltd [1982] 1 
Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1988] ICR 142
Kelly-Madden v Manor Surgery (UKEAT/0105/06)
Irgesund Converters Ltd v Lewis ,198411CR 544 at 552.
Celanese v. BP [1999] RPC 203.
Union Carbide v. BP [1998] FSR 1
Siddell v. Vickers (1888) 5 RPC 416
My Kinda ,Town II [1983] RPC 15
Potton v. Yorkclose [1990] FSR 11
Cohen v Roche [1927J 1 KB 169
Sky Petroleum Ltd v VIP Petroleum Ltd [1974] 1 All ER 954
Ball v Coggs (710) 1 Bro Pari Cas 140, HL;
Kenney v Wexham (l822) 6 Madd 355;
Adderley v Dix:on (1824) I Sim & 51 607;
Clifford v Turrell (J84l) I Y & C Ch Cas 138;
Beswick v Beswick [1968J AC 58
Ashton v Corrigan (I87l) LR 13 Eq 76
Swiss Bank Corpn v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1982] AC 584
Deero-Wall International SA v Practitioners in Marketing Ltd [1971J 1 WLR 361
Evans Marshall & Co v Bertola SA [1973J 1 All ER 992.
Lumley v Wagner (l8S2) 1 De GM & G 604;
Johnson v Shrewsbury and Birmingham Rly (ISS3) 3 De GM & G 914;
Brett v East India and London Shipping Co Ltd (1864) 2 Hem & M 404
Britain v Rossiter , (I879) 11 QBD 123;
Rigby v Connol (I880) 14 Ch D 482;
De Francesco v Barnum (l890) 45 Ch D 430
Sutherland Publishing v Caxton Publishing [1936] Ch 323, 336
Ludlow v. Williams [2002] FSR 868, 882
Warner Bros Picture Inc v Nelson [1937] 1 KB 209
Page One Records Ltd v Britton [1967] 3 All ER 822
 CH Giles & Co Ltd v Morris [1972] 1 WLR 307
Scandinavian Trading Tanker Co Ab v Flota Petrolera Ecuatoriana, The Scraptrade [1983] 2 AC 694
Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association [1893] 1 Ch 116
Tito v Waddell (No.2) [1977] Ch 106
Giles & Co Ltd v Morris
Jefferys v Jefferys (l841) Cr & Ph 138
Cannon v Hartley [1949] Ch 213.
Wolverhampton Corpn v Emmons [1901] 1 KB 515 at 525, per Romer LJ;
Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris [1970] AC 652 at 666,
England v Curling (I844) 8 Beav 129
Sichel v Mosenthal (1862) 30 Beav 371; and Scott v Rayment (I868)LR ,  Eq 112.
Baxter v Conolly (l820) I Jac & W S76
Darbey v Whitaker (18S7) 4 Drew 134
Bluscope Steel v Kelly (2007) FCA 517
The Spycatcher [1990] AC 109
Coulthard v. DMC [1999]2All ER 457, 477-80
Attorney General v Blake [1996] 3 WLR 741
Gorse v Durham County Council [1971]2 All ER 666
Ruxley Electronics and Construction Limited v Forsyth [1996] AC 344

Attorney General v Blake (2001)1 AC 268

Internet references

H, MacQueen et al, “DCFR and “restitutionary damages” for breach of contract” http://www.law.ed.ac.ukleplnlblogentry.aspx?blogentryref=7780
 S, Cotton, “Remedies for breach of contract” · http://ld.practicallaw.coml7 -101-0603

Legislation
Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Misrepresentation Act 1967
Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.
Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982

Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002.
Civil Procedure Rules 1998
Sale of Goods Act. 1893
Sale of Goods Act 1979
Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999
Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974,
Employment Rights Act 1996
Intellectual Property (Enforcement, etc) Regulations 2006 


Direct Public Access Barristers and Employment Barristers

December 21, 2011
Leave a Comment

To find Public Access Barristers for your hearings, you can either phone us on 0800 019 7073 or 0203 603 3779 giving the case details (minus party names) as specified below or fill in the contact form. We take bookings from businesses, members of the public and solicitors.

Barrister Profile

Montclare Campbell LL.B First Class Honours

Direct Public Access Barrister at Clerksroom Chambers

Montclare’s clerks : 0845 083 3000

Email: Campbell@clerksroom.com

London – 218 Strand

Telephone: 0207 125 0421 (International: +44 207 125 0421)
Fax: 0845 083 3001 (International: +44 1823 747 003)
Clerks: 0845 083 3000 (24/7) (International: +44 1823 442 671)
Post: 3rd Floor, 218 Strand, London, WC2R 1AT
DX: 232 London Chancery Lane
General Information

Montclare is known for his personable approach, attention to client care, focus and flexibility in all areas of his practice. He is a determined advocate who prioritises the interests of his clients as much as possible. His advocacy experience extends over 5 years from April 2007.

He is direct / public access qualified and is happy to take instructions from businesses (commercial, civil litigation and employment law work) and HR professionals in relation to employment tribunal matters.

Advocacy

Fast & Multi-Track trials
Interlocutory hearings
Advice and pleadings
Employment Tribunal
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Mediation representation

Montclare provides representation in all of Clerksroom’s practice areas including:

Civil Litigation & Advocacy (RTA/PI/Credit Hire Claims)
Landlord & Tenant (Commercial & Residential)
Family (Children & Matrimonial Finance)

Recommendations

Comments from instructing solicitors include:

“Montclare provided a great service, dealing well with clients and giving excellent advice.”

“Montclare was instructed to attend Court in a straight forward, simple matter which he still dealt with in a very professional and efficient manner. When in discussion with Montclare he was always very polite and was also very quick in returning calls and reporting the outcome of the trial. I would recommend Montclare to colleagues.”

“Thats great news, thank you for your services in this matter.”

“Many thanks for this speedy work” (Solicitor comments regarding written work)

“That’s wonderful. Many thanks Monty.”

“Stellar effort! Very pleased with the outcome.”

“Many thanks for representing the client at today’s hearing. I can confirm that the client was very happy with your expertise and competence.”

“Thank You, Montclare looks like you did a fine job……..”

Results in 2012 include:

Full recovery of all costs incurred of over £12,000 on a fast track matter for instructing solicitors
Successful skeleton argument dealing with cpr 27.14(2)(g) to assist with recovery of costs for unreasonable conduct
Numerous victories for both Defendants and Claimants in relation to personal injury, road traffic accident and credit hire matters
Successful CFA personal injury matter
Judgment obtained on behalf of major security company client
Awaiting judgments in relation to:

Multi-day employment tribunal matter
Other employment tribunal matters dealing with unfair dismissal, breach of contract, frustration, discrimination, wasted costs and equitable jurisdiction.

Why choose Montclare as your barrister?

Intellectual heavyweight and commercially focused – Having graduated with a first class honours degree in law, he is down to earth and personable and takes a practical and commercial approach to legal problems.

The big picture – He has experience of dealing with cases from initial instruction, drafting pleadings to final hearing.

Expertise with flexibility – He has wide advocacy experience and is open to receiving instructions in all of Clerksroom’s areas of expertise. He has been instructed by residential associations and private landlords in a number of possession hearings and has undertaken civil litigation matters in addition to several instructions as an employment law advocate.

Flexible fees – Open to a range of fee options to suit client needs.

Available across the UK – Montclare is happy to travel nationally (and internationally) and has appeared in courts and tribunals from Southampton to Manchester, often on short notice.

Areas of expertise

Employment Law

Montclare’s advocacy saved one business over £150,000. This is one of his major areas of expertise. He has extensive 360 degree HR knowledge with particular expertise in Absence / Performance Management, disciplinary, grievance and incapacity procedures, Parental Leave / Flexible working legislation, Agency Workers Regulations, Equality, TUPE, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal and Public Interest Disclosure matters. His practice covers the full range of contentious and non-contentious work.

He has negotiated favourable settlements for Respondents, developed processes in organisations from contract and policies formation, through to advice on the delivery of employee relations procedures and represented businesses in the Employment Tribunal. Appearances have included all London tribunals and others across the UK.

Commercial & Civil Litigation

Montclare has appeared in court on behalf of both Claimants and Defendants, assisting with recovery of damages / debts and dealing with breach of contract claims.

Landlord and Tenant (Commercial and Residential)

Montclare has appeared in many possession and forfeiture proceedings. He has also deal with occupiers liability matters.

Leasehold Enfranchisement

Montclare has advised on leasehold enfranchisement proceedings and trained under one of the contributors to the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Regulatory & Disciplinary Offences

Montclare has appeared before the Nursing and Midwifery Council and is developing his practice in other regulatory areas.

Appellate Work

Montclare has appeared before the Employment Appeal Tribunal.
He is currently awaiting instructions in relation to a case to be heard before the European Court of Human Rights, further to his successful advocacy at first instance level in the matter.

Road Traffic Act (RTA) & Motoring Offences – Privately Funded

Montclare has developed a minor niche private practice in Road Traffic Offences. Results in 2010/2011 included;

Persuading CPS to drop driving without due care and attention/ mobile phone charges against taxi driver client.

– Successfully arguing mitigation grounds resulting in a 50% reduction in disqualification for a client charged with a drink driving offence

– Successfully requesting the postponement of a hearing, without additional penalty, for a client who was out of the country despite previous failure to attend

Prior to coming to the Bar Montclare had extensive experience in the legal profession ranging from 1998 when fresh out of school he took an early gap year before A Levels to work as a junior in an administrative capacity at a Legal 200 law firm, to more recently providing legal advice to over 800 businesses, whilst seconded to a FTSE AIM listed PLC. He has experience taking matters from initial instruction to final instance and/or settlement, having worked in various capacities in a variety of law firms and can foresee how to avoid potential obstacles well in advance due to this insight.

Education
LLB First Class Honours Law

Outside the office
Montclare plays the piano and hammond organ.

Follow Montclare on Twitter @montycampbell
employment lawyers, barrister, barristers chamber

 

1

THE DIRECT PUBLIC ACCESS TO BARRISTERS SCHEME:

 

Guidance for businesses and members of the public on instructing Montclare as your public access Barrister

 

Introduction

The purpose of this guide is to explain how the public access scheme works and to show how businesses and members of the public can use it to instruct Montclare.

 

What is public access?

Members of the public may now go directly to Montclare a Public Access Barrister without having to involve an instructing solicitor or other intermediary. In the past it was necessary for clients to use a solicitor or other recognised third party through whom Montclare would be instructed.

 

Although Montclare’s role remains essentially the same, businesses and members of the public may instruct Montclare directly through the public access scheme.

 

What are the advantages of the public access scheme?

The main advantage of the public access scheme is that it could potentially save you money whilst giving you access to the Bar, since you would be paying for Montclare only instead of Montclare and a solicitor. However, although Montclare would be able to deal with most aspects of the case, you could have to assist in some limited areas, generally with filing documents with the court. This is explained in more detail below.

 

Is my case suitable for public access?

Public access is available in all types of work that Montclare can do, except for work funded out of legal aid. It is most suitable for reasonably straightforward cases. It is likely to be inappropriate in cases involving children. If you are not sure whether your case would be suitable for public access, you should contact Montclare (see below) or his clerk and seek an initial view. If Montclare considers that your case would benefit from the involvement of a solicitor, he will tell you so. Montclare may choose whether or not to take a public access case. The factors which he will take into account are discussed below.

 

How do I make use of the public access scheme?

2

To use the scheme, you would have to instruct Montclare yourself. Further details of how to

do this are given in this guidance.

 

3

The public access scheme

The difference between the services offered by Montclare and a solicitor

Montclare specialises in providing expert legal advice, advocacy and the drafting of documents.

 

 

The services offered by Montclare is different from those offered by solicitors for two main

reasons.

 

1) First the different service offered:

Montclare is trained as a specialist adviser and advocate. This means that he becomes involved where expert legal advice is needed, where documents need to be drafted for their clients to use, or for advocacy (presenting a case in court or before some other tribunal or organisation). Solicitors also give advice to and draft documents for their clients to use or may instruct Montclare to provide this service. Some solicitors also provide advocacy services to their

clients, although many prefer to instruct Montclare to do this.

 

2) By law, Montclare is not able to provide some of the services that solicitors offer. On the other hand, some solicitors do not themselves provide advocacy services. At present only a solicitor may conduct litigation and take the formal steps that are necessary to progress and action. Montclare will advise you if he considers that anything you want done is something that only a solicitor can provide.

 

 

 

Some examples of work which Montclare is allowed to do:

a) Montclare may appear on your behalf at Court.

b) Montclare may give you legal advice.

c) Montclare may draft documents for you, such as a will.

d) Montclare may advise you on the formal steps which need to be taken in proceedings

before a court or other organisation and draft formal documents for use in those

proceedings.

e) Montclare may draft and send letters for you on his Chambers’ headed paper.

f) If a witness statement from you is required in proceedings, Montclare may prepare that

statement from what you tell him or her. Montclare may also help to prepare witness statements from another person based on the information which that person has provided.

g) Where a case requires an expert witness (for example, a surveyor), Montclare may advise you on the choice of a suitable expert and may draft a letter of instruction which you

can then send to the expert as a letter from you on your own notepaper.

 

 

4

What Montclare cannot do on your behalf:

The following are examples of work that Montclare is not allowed to do:

a) Montclare cannot issue proceedings on your behalf or to issue other applications or to take other formal steps in court or other proceedings. You would have to send the documents to the court, although Montclare could help prepare them for you.

b) Montclare is not allowed to instruct an expert witness on your behalf.

c) Montclare is not allowed to take responsibility for the handling of clients’ affairs, or to handle clients’ money.

 

Is my case suitable for public access?

In considering whether your case is suitable for Public access, Montclare is likely to take

into account

a) The nature of the work which you wish him or her to undertake

b) Your ability to deal with any aspects of the case which would normally be carried out by a

solicitor that cannot be covered by Montclare.

Much depends on the circumstances of your case. Here are some possibilities:

a) Montclare might decide that your case is suitable for public access and that there is no

need for the involvement of a solicitor. If circumstances change, Montclare may have to advise you that a solicitor will need to be instructed.

b) Although your case may become unsuitable for public access in the future, it is suitable

for public access for the time being. In such a case, Montclare will inform you

i) of the work which is suitable for public access

ii) the likely point at which your case will become unsuitable for public access and

iii) that he will have to withdraw at that stage if you do not instruct a solicitor.

c) Your case is such that (whether because of its complexity, or because of the stage which

it has reached) it is not suitable for public access and that a solicitor is required. In this situation, you should be told by Montclare why your case is not suitable and that he would be prepared to act for you if instructed by a solicitor. In such circumstances you can ask Montclare to recommend a suitable solicitor to you. If Montclare decides to accept your instructions, you will be sent a client care letter.

 

Is Montclare obliged to accept public access work?

5

Montclare may choose whether or not to accept public access work. This choice is restricted

in that it is impermissible to refuse to take on a case for specific reasons, relating to

discrimination.

 

When deciding whether to accept instructions in a case, Montclare must consider whether that case is suitable for public access. If he she decides that it is not suitable, he must decline the instructions. Throughout the case, Montclare remains under a continuing

duty to consider whether a case remains suitable for public access, and he must refuse to continue to act on a public access basis if it is no longer suitable.

 

Does a Barrister need special training to take public access work?

 

Barristers must satisfy a number of conditions before they can accept public access work.

Subject to limited exceptions, before a Barrister is permitted to accept public access work he

or she must have:

a) practised for a total of three years following the completion of training

b) attended a “public access” training course approved by the Bar Standards Board and

c) given certain notices which are required to be given by the Bar Code of Conduct.

 

Or received exemption from (a) and (b) due to a similar level of experience

 

Instructing a public access Barrister

 

6

 

How do I instruct Montclare?

Try to clarify in your own mind the nature of your problem and what it is that you want Montclare to do.

Telephone Montclare’s clerking team on 0845 083 3000 Montclare practises and tell them that you wish to instruct Montclare directly.

 

He will tell you what to do next. You will have to explain that you wish to instruct Montclare directly and the nature of the work which you wish Montclare to undertake for you. You may be asked to send written instructions, setting out the factual background to your case and what it is that you want Montclare to do. Alternatively, Montclare may decide that it would be appropriate in the first instance to discuss the matter with you on the telephone or at a preliminary meeting to decide on the best way forward.

 

Proof of your identity

In certain circumstances, Montclare will be required by law to carry out certain identification procedures. These must be followed as soon as reasonably practicable after you have first made contact with Montclare – it is likely that this will take place after you make the initial contact described above. Whether these procedures apply and, if so, how they should be followed, need to be considered by Montclare when you first make contact.

 

Where the procedure applies, Montclare will require satisfactory evidence of your identity –

that is, proof of your name, date of birth and current address. The type of evidence required will depend on the circumstances. For example:

 

a) If you are acting as an individual, you may be required to produce in person your current passport or other national identity card or a new form of driving licence (with a photograph)

together with a recent utility bill, bank or building society statement.

 

b) If you are acting on behalf of a company, you will need to produce a certified copy of the Certificate of Incorporation, the latest accounts filed at Companies House and evidence that you are authorised to act on behalf of the company.

 

To carry out the procedures properly, Montclare may well have to have a meeting with

you. You will be told what to bring to that meeting. Montclare is required to take copies of

the documents which you bring and to retain those copies for 5 years.

 

What happens next?

Montclare will have to decide whether your case is suitable for public access. He will charge you for this Preliminary work.

 

7

If your case is suitable for public access, you and Montclare will have to agree the terms on which he is to carry out the work. Those terms will be set out in a client care letter which will be sent to you.

If your case is not suitable for public access, Montclare will tell you so. If you wish, he may recommend a suitable solicitor for you to instruct. Some cases obviously will be suitable for public access. In such a case, and provided that:

 

(a) Montclare is willing to undertake the work, (b) agreement can be reached about the  charge which will be made for that work and (c) where appropriate, you have provided satisfactory proof of your identity, your instructions will be accepted and a client care letter will be sent to you. The role and importance of the client care letter is described below.

 

In other cases, Montclare may suggest that you have a preliminary meeting before deciding whether or not to proceed with the instructions.

It is also open to Montclare to accept instructions to read the papers for which there will be a charge and advise whether or not he is able to perform the work which you wish him or her to undertake.

 

The client care letter

The client care letter records the terms of the agreement between you and Montclare. It is a very important document and you must read it carefully.

It contains a description of the work to be undertaken, the basis on which you will be charged for that work, and the other terms of the agreement between you and Montclare. If you are unclear about, or disagree with any of the contents of that letter, you must raise your concerns with Montclare immediately.

 

How will I be charged?

Montclare usually charges according to the complexity of the case

and the length of time involved in dealing with it. It is important that the cost to you, and the stage at which the fee is payable is agreed at the outset, and that the terms of the agreement are clear to both you and Montclare.

 

There are no formal scales of fees for Montclare’s work. Montclare will charge according to the complexity and length of time involved in any particular matter. The amount to be charged for any particular piece of work, and when the fee becomes payable, is a matter for negotiation between you, Montclare and his clerk.

 

It is very important that you and Montclare agree from the outset the basis upon which you are to be charged for work and the time at which the fee will become payable.

 

8

Where the fee relates to a hearing, Montclare is entitled to the fee, whether or not the hearing goes ahead.

 

In other cases (whether for a conference or for paperwork), it may be possible to fix a fee in advance for the work. However, that will not be possible in every case. Where it is not possible, you should ask for an estimate. You may be able to agree with Montclare that

there should be a “ceiling” on the fee charged for a particular piece of work.

 

If you agree a fee in advance of the work being done, then Montclare will require that fee to be paid before carrying out the work. Where a fee is not fixed in advance and the work involves the production of paperwork (for example, the drafting of a contract), Montclare will require you to pay for the work after he has completed it and before releasing it to you.

 

Although conditional fee agreements (agreements under which a fee becomes payable only in the event of success in a case) are possible, it is unlikely that Montclare will be willing or able to undertake public access work on a conditional fee basis, save in very rare cases.

 

Montclare is required to keep sufficient records to justify the fees that he is charging. You are entitled to ask for details to justify the fee that you are being charged.

 

 

 

What if I qualify or may qualify for public funding?

If you could be eligible for public funding, Montclare has to advise you to approach a solicitor. It is unlikely that Montclare will be able to carry out the means assessment required to establish whether you would qualify for public funding. Further, at present, Montclare is not

able to apply to the Legal Services Commission for public funding on your behalf. If it appears that you may qualify for public funding, therefore, Montclare has to advise you to approach a solicitor with a franchise from the legal Services Commission to investigate this

possibility.

 

Can Montclare stop acting for me after he has accepted my instructions?

In public access cases, Montclare must stop acting for you if he considers that the case is no longer suitable for public access. Montclare may be able to assist if, as aconsequence of no longer continuing to act for you, you will or may experience difficulties in

relation to an imminent hearing.

In public access cases, Montclare is also required to cease to act where he has formed the view that it is in your interests or the interests of justice that you instruct a solicitor or other professional person. In such cases:

 

a) Montclare is under a continuing duty to consider whether your case remains a suitable case for public access. If he forms the view that it is not, you will be advised of this fact. If you then instruct a solicitor or Montclare, he may continue to act for you. If you do not, Montclare must cease to act for you.

 

 

9 b) If you are a party to proceedings in which a hearing is imminent, and you are likely to

have difficulty in finding a solicitor in time for the hearing, your Montclare should provide you

with such assistance as is proper to protect your position. Although Montclare may notcontinue to work for you on a public access basis, he may be able to assist you by,

for example:

 

i) Drafting letters for you to send, asking for an adjournment of the hearing

ii) Writing a letter to the court in support of that application, explaining that he has had

to withdraw and, if appropriate, the reasons for it

iii) Assisting you to find solicitors.

 

Can I instruct Montclare directly when I have already instructed solicitors?

 

You may instruct Montclare directly even though you have already instructed solicitors. If you do so, Montclare will still have to consider whether he should accept your instructions. However, the fact that you have retained solicitors is not of itself a reason for refusing to accept your instructions; nor may Montclare contact your solicitors without your

permission. However, there may be cases (for example, where your case involves existing litigation) where Montclare will refuse to accept your instructions unless you give him or her permission to contact and liaise with your solicitors and you also give your solicitors the necessary permission to provide information to Montclare.

 

Confidentiality and compulsory disclosure of information

Montclare will be under a strict professional duty to keep your affairs confidential. Legal professional privilege protects your communications with Montclare from disclosure. The

only exception is that any lawyer may be required by law to disclose information to governmental or other regulatory authorities, and to do so without first obtaining your consent to such disclosure or telling you that he has made it.

 

For further details on instructing Montclare email him campbell@clerksroom.com


Posted in Barrister, Barristers, Employment Law
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Contact us 0800 019 7073 – Direct Access Barristers / Public Access Barristers – Employment Law Barristers – www.EmploymentBarristers.org

    This is an informational website about UK Barristers and law. We define what they do and how they can assist you at courts, tribunals and in relation to legal advice. We can help in your search for a Direct Access Barrister / Public Access Barrister, Employment Barrister or Employment Barristers Chambers UK wide.

    Keywords barristers, barrister chambers, barrister, barristers chamber, employment lawyer, employment lawyers

    Search website

    Disclaimer

    We own all rights to the content of this site therefore any attempt made to sell or distribute them by another individual or company, without our written permission will constitute an infringement of copyright law. Any party purporting to do so will be reported to the relevant authorities and legal action will be taken.The contents are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. If you have a legal problem you should consult a lawyer for advice. The authors exclude themselves from all liability for any reliance academic or otherwise on the contents. © Copyright All Rights Reserved 2011-2012

    Privacy Policy

    Web site owner privacy policy Privacy Statement The web site owner respects the privacy and security of its users. The information you provide to the web site owner is used selectively by us to qualify solicitors or barristers for your case, and put you in contact with the suitable solicitor(s) or barristers. Some of the information will be passed on to the solicitors or barristers that we deem to be suitable so that they can contact you to progress your case. In order to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy, we have prepared this statement disclosing the privacy practices for the the website owner site. This statement describes what personally identifiable information we collect from you, how and when information is used, how we protect your information, and who has access to your information. i) What information is collected? The website owner asks you to provide various types of personally identifiable information to enhance the quality of the service we can provide to you. As part of the process of using the site, the web site owner asks for information such as your name, e-mail address, and summary case details. The more accurate the information you provide, the better we are able to customise your experience and match you to a solicitor or barrister who can assist you with your legal matter. Following the use of our service, we may ask you for other information, such as completion of a customer satisfaction survey. Whenever you provide personally identifiable information to us, we will comply with our privacy policy. As with the vast majority of Web servers, our one automatically creates log files for each visitor who accesses our sites. These "access logs" allow us to make our site more useful to our visitors. The access logs do not record a visitor's name, address, phone number, or any other personally identifying information. Rather, these log files may contain some or all of the following information: The date of the visit The time and length of the visit The path taken through the Web site The browser being used A list of files downloaded or viewed The Internet Protocol Address (IP Address) of the machine accessing our Web site* Any errors encountered Web site owner uses this information to aid the technical administration of the sites and to better understand how the site is functioning for our users. ii) How and when information is used? Our primary goal in collecting personally identifiable information is to provide you, the user, with a high quality service, i.e. quickly contacting you to solicitors or barristers suitable for your case (and to you). This is contacted via the form(s) completed on the Web site owner website. In addition, our Web Server Logs collect non-personally identifiable information, such as which pages each user visits and the domain name of visitors. This information is used, for example, to help us identify which areas of our site are of interest to our visitors. Web site owner also collects the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of its visitors for the purposes of system administration. iii) Who has access to the information? Except as described below, Web site owner will not disclose any individually identifiable information about its users to any third party without first receiving that user's permission. Web site owner may disclose personal information when we believe in good faith that the law requires it or to protect the rights or property of Web site owner. When you are on the Web site owner site and asked for personal information, you share that information with Web site owner who in turn shares that information with solicitors who Web site owner is contacting on your behalf to qualify the solicitors' suitability for your case. You should understand that these solicitors might have separate privacy and data collection practices. Web site owner has no control over and accepts no liability for these independent practices. In order to understand the individual privacy policies that each solicitor or barrister follows, you should ask him or her for a copy of the privacy policy. iv) How we protect your information? The privacy and protection of your personal information is important to us. In addition, any user statistics that we may provide to prospective partners regarding your Web site owner usage are provided in the aggregate only and do not include any individually identifiable information. Unfortunately, no data transmission over the Internet can be guaranteed to be 100% secure. As such, despite our efforts to protect your personal information, Web site owner cannot ensure or warrant the security of any information you transmit to us, or to or from our online products or services. You transmit all such information at your own risk. However, once we receive your transmission, we make our best effort to ensure its security on our systems. So as to enhance the security of your data, we have in place physical, electronic and managerial procedures to protect the information we collect online. However, as effective as these measures are, no security system is impenetrable. We cannot guarantee the security of our database, nor can we guarantee that the information you supply will not be intercepted while being transmitted to us over the Internet. We reserve the right to change this policy. Any changes to this policy will be posted to this page as soon as reasonably possible, so please check this page periodically. Acceptance of Privacy Statement Your use of our web site, including any dispute concerning privacy, is subject to this privacy statement and the Terms and Conditions of Service. BY USING OUR WEBSITE, YOU ARE ACCEPTING THE PRACTICES SET OUT IN THIS PRIVACY POLICY AND OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE. We reserve the right to modify this privacy statement at any time by posting the changes on this page. Your continued use of any portion of the Web site owner web site following posting of the updated privacy statement will constitute your acceptance of the changes.